Cited by 106Influenza Virus Research StudiesMachine Learning in HealthcareSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Using a machine learning approach to predict mortality in critically ill influenza patients: A cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study in Taiwan

Open access
Hu, Chien-An, Chen, Chia-Ming, Fang, Yen-Chun, Liang, Shinn-Jye, Wang, Hao-Chien, Fang, Wen-Feng, Sheu, Chau-Chyun, Perng, Wann-Cherng +6 more·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current mortality prediction models used in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a limited role for specific diseases such as influenza, and we aimed to establish an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting mortality in critically ill influenza patients using a real-world severe influenza data set. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study in Taiwan SETTING: Eight medical centres in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 336 patients requiring ICU-admission for virology-proven influenza at eight hospitals during an influenza epidemic between October 2015 and March 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We employed extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to establish the prediction model, compared the performance with logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF), demonstrated the feature importance categorised by clinical domains, and used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for visualised interpretation. RESULTS: The data set contained 76 features of the 336 patients with severe influenza. The severity was apparently high, as shown by the high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (22, 17 to 29) and pneumonia severity index score (118, 88 to 151). XGBoost model (area under the curve (AUC): 0.842; 95% CI 0.749 to 0.928) outperformed RF (AUC: 0.809; 95% CI 0.629 to 0.891) and LR (AUC: 0.701; 95% CI 0.573 to 0.825) for predicting 30-day mortality. To give clinicians an intuitive understanding of feature exploitation, we stratified features by the clinical domain. The cumulative feature importance in the fluid balance domain, ventilation domain, laboratory data domain, demographic and symptom domain, management domain and severity score domain was 0.253, 0.113, 0.177, 0.140, 0.152 and 0.165, respectively. We further used SHAP plots to illustrate associations between features and 30-day mortality in critically ill influenza patients. CONCLUSIONS: We used a real-world data set and applied an ML approach, mainly XGBoost, to establish a practical and explainable mortality prediction model in critically ill influenza patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033898

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, C.-A., Chen, C.-M., Fang, Y.-C., Liang, S.-J., Wang, H.-C., Fang, W.-F., Sheu, C.-C., Perng, W.-C., Yang, K.-Y., Kao, K.-C., Wu, C.-L., Tsai, C.-S., Lin, M.-Y., & Chao, W.-C.
Affiliations
  • Feng Chia University (TW)
  • National Chung Hsing University (TW)
  • China Medical University Hospital (TW)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TW)
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Lin, Ming-Yen
  • Chao, Wen-Cheng
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-02
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
e033898
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007001459
Cited by
106
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 7
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Veterans General Hospitals and the University System of Taiwan Joint Research Program (VGHUST108-G2-4-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
influenza, mortality prediction, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, extreme gradient boosting, SHAP, explainable machine learning, 30-day mortality, fluid balance, mechanical ventilation, APACHE II score, Pneumonia Severity Index, feature importance, Taiwan, real-world data, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Retrospective Studies, Taiwan, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review