Cited by 30Infection Control and VentilationHealthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementInfection Control in Healthcare

Thinking green: Modelling respirator reuse strategies to reduce cost and waste

Open access
Chu, Jacqueline, Ghenand, Omkar, Collins, Joy, Byrne, James, Wentworth, Adam, Chai, Peter R., Dadabhoy, Farah, Hur, Chin +1 more·2021·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives To compare the impact of respirator extended use and reuse strategies with regard to cost and sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design Cost analysis. Setting USA. Participants All healthcare workers within the USA. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures A model was developed to estimate usage, costs and waste incurred by several respirator usage strategies over the first 6 months of the pandemic in the USA. This model assumed universal masking of all healthcare workers. Estimates were taken from the literature, government databases and commercially available data from approved vendors. Results A new N95 respirator per patient encounter would require 7.41 billion respirators, cost $6.38 billion and generate 84.0 million kg of waste in the USA over 6 months. One respirator per day per healthcare worker would require 3.29 billion respirators, cost $2.83 billion and generate 37.22 million kg of waste. Decontamination by ultraviolet germicidal irradiation would require 1.64 billion respirators, cost $1.41 billion and accumulate 18.61 million kg of waste. H 2 O 2 vapour decontamination would require 1.15 billion respirators, cost $1.65 billion and produce 13.03 million kg of waste. One reusable respirator with daily disposable filters would require 18 million respirators, cost $1.24 billion and generate 15.73 million kg of waste. Pairing a reusable respirator with H 2 O 2 vapour-decontaminated filters would reduce cost to $831 million and generate 1.58 million kg of waste. The use of one surgical mask per healthcare worker per day would require 3.29 billion masks, cost $460 million and generate 27.92 million kg of waste. Conclusions Decontamination and reusable respirator-based strategies decreased the number of respirators used, costs and waste generated compared with single-use or daily extended-use of disposable respirators. Future development of low-cost,simple technologies to enable respirator and/or filter decontamination is needed to further minimise the economic and environmental costs of masks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048687

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decontamination and reusable respirator-based strategies could reduce the number of N95 respirators and surgical masks used, costs and garbage generated.

    “Decontamination and reusable respirator-based strategies could reduce the number of N95 respirators and surgical masks used, costs and garbage generated [7,10].”

    From Waste Management and the Perspective of a Green Hospital—A Systematic Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion (Principal findings) and Results (Mask usage) report that decontamination and reusable-respirator strategies reduced respirator requirements, costs and waste in the model. The paper models daily surgical-mask use as a separate strategy, but does not show that decontaminating or reusing respirators reduces the number of surgical masks used. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The pandemic dramatically improved demand for N95 respirators and surgical masks, leading to supply shortages, spending of billions of dollars, and production of great amounts of medical waste.

    “the pandemic has dramatically improved the demand for N95 respirators and surgical masks across the world, leading to supply shortages, the spending of billions of dollars and production of great amounts of medical waste.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overview of U.S. Hospital stays in 2016: variation by geographic region, 2018. Available: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb246-Geographic-Variation-Hospital-Stays.jsp [Accessed August 2020]. 30720972
  2. [65]Clinical Evidence Assessment. Safety of Extended Use and Reuse of N95 Respirator. ECRI, 2020. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/997863/COVID-ECRI-N95-Respirators_2020-03.pdf [Accessed April 2020].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, J., Ghenand, O., Collins, J., Byrne, J., Wentworth, A., Chai, P. R., Dadabhoy, F., Hur, C., & Traverso, G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Traverso, Giovanni
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e048687
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185565409
Cited by
30
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program, UROP- N/A)
  • National Institutes of Health (5T32DK007191, K23DA044874, R44DA051106)
  • Karl van Tassel Career Development Professorship, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Not applicable/no grant number)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
respirator reuse, N95 respirators, respirator decontamination, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, healthcare worker personal protective equipment, COVID-19 pandemic, cost analysis, sustainability, surgical masks
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Decontamination, Humans, Hydrogen Peroxide, Masks, Ventilators, Mechanical, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review