The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental health and working constraints of first-year PhD students in health and science in a French university: a cross-sectional study in the context of occupational health monitoring
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the mental health and working constraints perception of first-year PhD in France. Design: It is a cross-sectional study. Setting: The study was conducted by the team of the Lyon 1 University’s Occupational Health and Medical Service for Staff, from October 2019 to February 2020. First-year PhD students employed by the university were seen during the routine occupational health medical check-up. Participants: A total of 161 PhD students in science from the 2019 intake were included in the study (participation rate 98%). Outcome measures: Data were collected using a self-questionnaire on psychosocial constraints at work (Job Content Questionnaire), the quality of the professional relationship with the supervisor (Advisory Working Alliance Inventory, Student perspective (AWAI-S)), medical conditions, anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). Results: A total of 161 PhD students from the 2019 intake were included in the study (participation rate 98%). Most of the PhD students reported high psychological demands (58%), high decision latitude (53%), high social support (55%) and good professional relationships with their supervisor (mean of global score of AWAI-S=114.5). However, 34% showed signs of at least mild depression, 19% showed signs of anxiety and 20% were referred to a mental health professional after the survey. Bivariate analyses showed that history of psychiatric disorders, their relationship with their supervisor, having complementary teaching activities and stressful working conditions contributed to anxiety and depression. Conclusions: Even in the first year of their PhD, some students had mental health issues. It seems relevant to generalise the medical follow-up of all PhD students as soon as they enter the doctoral programme in order to detect and treat their health problems and psychological disorders at an early stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“random sampling was used rarely (for exceptions, see refs. 50–58).”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Additionally, only a few studies (predominantly databases) used random (instead of convenience) sampling techniques50–53,56–58.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOWE, B. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00237-9 · Cited by 1,060
Hinz, A., Klein, A. M., Brähler, E., Glaesmer, H., Luck, T., Riedel-Heller, S. G., Wirkner, K., & Hilbert, A. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.012 · Cited by 443
Measuring the working alliance in advisor–advisee relationships in graduate school.
Schlosser, L. Z., & Gelso, C. J. (2001) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.157 · Cited by 211
Gender and doctoral studies: the perceptions of Ph.D. students in an American university
Kurtz‐Costes, B., Andrews Helmke, L., & Ülkü‐Steiner, B. (2006) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540250500380513 · Cited by 167
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Woolston, 2019, PhDs: the tortuous truth, Nature, 575, 403, 10.1038/d41586-019-03459-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Marais G , Shankland R , Haag P . A positive psychology study and intervention on the well-being of French PhD students in biology 2017:25. · DOI
- Haag, 2018, Stress perçu et santé physique des doctorants dans les universités françaises, Prat Psychol, 24, 1
- Gérard, 2017, Niveau de stress perçu par les doctorants et stratégies de coping dysfonctionnelles, Rech En Éducation, 29, 134
- Schmidt, 2018, Doctoral students' well-being: a literature review, Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 13, 10.1080/17482631.2018.1508171 · DOI · Paper page
- Hunter, 2016, Doctoral Students’ Emotional Exhaustion and Intentions to Leave Academia, Int J Dr Stud, 11, 35
- Broc, 2020, Burnout académique en doctorat. Validation d’une échelle de burnout adaptée aux étudiants francophones en doctorat, Ann Méd-Psychol Rev Psychiatr, 178, 517
- Faye-Dumanget, 2018, L’épuisement académique chez les étudiants : effet des variables sociodémographiques sur les niveaux de burn-out, Ann Méd-Psychol Rev Psychiatr, 176, 870
- Satinsky, 2021, Systematic review and meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among Ph.D. students, Sci Rep, 11, 10.1038/s41598-021-93687-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Hahn, 2020, Évaluation des risques psychosociaux de la population des personnels de l’Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 : identification de populations risque, Arch Mal Prof Env, 81, 83
- 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/eurpub/cki028 · DOI
- Memmi, 2019, Premiers résultats de l’enquête SUMER 2017, Réf Santé Trav, 159, 53
- Kerrien, 2015, [Prevalence of anxiety disorders and depression among junior doctors and their links with their work], Presse Med, 44, 84, 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.06.042 · DOI
- Knipe, 2018, Mental health in medical, dentistry and veterinary students: cross-sectional online survey, BJPsych Open, 4, 441, 10.1192/bjo.2018.61 · DOI
- Hazell, 2020, Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis, Syst Rev, 9, 10.1186/s13643-020-01443-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Paivandi, 2010, L’expérience pédagogique des moniteurs comme analyseur de l’université, Rev Fr Pédagogie, 172, 29, 10.4000/rfp.2200 · DOI
- Larsson, 2003, The education of research psychologists in Sweden, Eur Psychol, 8, 34, 10.1027//1016-9040.8.1.34 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahalli, S., Fort, E., Bridai, Y., Baborier, N., & Charbotel, B.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e057679
- ISSN
- 2044-6055
- PMC
- PMC9247661
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
