Cited by 7Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesAnesthesia and Pain Management

Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis

Open access
McIsaac, Daniel I, Hutton, Brian, Veroniki, Areti, Gill, Marlyn, Boland, Laura, Branje, Karina, Grudzinski, Alexa L, Hladkowicz, Emily +2 more·2022·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Prehabilitation is a high-priority intervention for patients, the public, clinicians and health systems. However, existing knowledge syntheses are generally low quality and do not provide insights regarding the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (eg, exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions). The objective of the planned review is to evaluate the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components to inform current care, implementation and future research. Methods and analysis: We will perform a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (CNMA). We will use a peer-reviewed search strategy to identify all randomised trials of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients from Ovid Medline, Embase, the CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, along with grey literature. All stages of the review and data extraction process will be performed in duplicate, following recommended best practices. To compare the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (prespecified as exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions), we will use CNMA, an extension of network meta-analysis that allows estimation of the contributions to efficacy of each component of a multicomponent intervention through direct and indirect comparisons. We will use additive CNMA models for critical outcomes (postoperative complications, patient-reported recovery, physical recovery and length of stay); standard care will be the common reference condition. Pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: This review of published data does not require ethical review. Results will be disseminated via scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications, social and traditional media and via our research network to target partners and organisations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068797

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Shaw J, Beasley E, Hladkowicz E. A survey of older people after major surgery: Prioritization of routine and patient-reported postoperative outcome measures. In: Ottawa Quaity & Patient Safety Conference, 2018.
  2. [36]McIsaac DI, Gill M, Boland L. Prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Ann Surg 2021: Submitted. 34922735

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McIsaac, D. I., Hutton, B., Veroniki, A., Gill, M., Boland, L., Branje, K., Grudzinski, A. L., Hladkowicz, E., Shaw, J., & Gillis, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Patient Partner, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
McIsaac, Daniel I
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
e068797
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309619185
Cited by
7
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (179837)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
prehabilitation, surgical patients, physical activity, nutrition, psychosocial interventions, cognitive intervention, postoperative complications, physical recovery, length of hospital stay, multicomponent intervention, component network meta-analysis
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Preoperative Exercise, Adult, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review