Cited by 10Neonatal and Maternal InfectionsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Assessing neonatal sequential organ failure (nSOFA) scores in suspected late-onset neonatal sepsis among preterm infants: implications for morbidity and mortality

Open access
Kurul, Şerife, Reijnierse, Joyce J, Koppens, Hugo J, Onland, Wes, Simons, Sinno H P, Reiss, Irwin K M, Taal, H Rob, Visser, Douwe H·2024·BMJ Paediatrics Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA) score is an organ dysfunction score developed for predicting mortality risk in preterm neonates with proven late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) and necrotising enterocolitis. However, the utility of the nSOFA score in determining the risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or mortality in patients with suspected LONS is unknown. METHODS: We performed a dual-centre retrospective cohort study of preterm (gestational age <32 weeks) neonates suspected of LONS, from 2016 to 2020 at two neonatal intensive care units. The nSOFA scores (range 0-15) were calculated for each suspected LONS episode at various time points around the sepsis evaluation. A nSOFA burden score was calculated, by counting each time point the nSOFA score was ≥4 during all sepsis episodes (in the time period -6 to 48 hours). The association with 10-day sepsis-related mortality and severe ROP and BPD was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1157 episodes of suspected LONS in 706 neonates occurred. The nSOFA was significantly associated with 10-day mortality at various time points. The nSOFA score 6 hours after drawing a blood culture (T6) was associated with 10-day sepsis-related mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.31; 95% CI (1.22 to 1.40; p<0.001)), in a model corrected for gestational age, sex, age at evaluation and gestational age-adjusted birth weight. The nSOFA burden scores were positively associated with the risk for ROP (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.41; p=0.001) and BPD (aOR 1.30; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.50; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the nSOFA score in preterm neonates suspected of LONS is associated with subsequent mortality, ROP and BPD. Incorporating nSOFA scores may help to identify sepsis survivors at the highest risk of adverse outcomes, who may require more intensive monitoring and adapted therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002884

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cumulative nSOFA score during late onset sepsis events in preterm infants is positively associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years of age.

    “Kurul et al. showed the cumulative nSOFA score during late onset sepsis events in preterm infants was positively associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years of age (16).”

    From Association of the neonatal sequential organ failure assessment score with neurological outcomes in infants diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Outcome measurements section lists 10-day mortality, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and the Results report associations with those outcomes. A search for neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years found no passage assessing them, so this copy does not verify the attributed association. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurul, Ş., Reijnierse, J. J., Koppens, H. J., Onland, W., Simons, S. H. P., Reiss, I. K. M., Taal, H. R., & Visser, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Taal, H Rob
Venue
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2024-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e002884
ISSN
2399-9772 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405875007
Cited by
10
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Paediatrics Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
late-onset neonatal sepsis, preterm infants, sepsis mortality, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, organ dysfunction, sepsis risk stratification, adverse neonatal outcomes, necrotizing enterocolitis
MeSH terms
Neonatal Sepsis, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Retinopathy of Prematurity, Retrospective Studies, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Organ Dysfunction Scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review