Cited by 666Nursing education and managementPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

. Care left undone during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care.

Open access
Ball, Jane E, Murrells, Trevor, Rafferty, Anne Marie, Morrow, Elizabeth, Griffiths, Peter·2014·BMJ Quality & Safety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence to show that lower nurse staffing levels in hospitals are associated with worse patient outcomes. One hypothesised mechanism is the omission of necessary nursing care caused by time pressure-'missed care'. AIM: To examine the nature and prevalence of care left undone by nurses in English National Health Service hospitals and to assess whether the number of missed care episodes is associated with nurse staffing levels and nurse ratings of the quality of nursing care and patient safety environment. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of 2917 registered nurses working in 401 general medical/surgical wards in 46 general acute National Health Service hospitals in England. RESULTS: Most nurses (86%) reported that one or more care activity had been left undone due to lack of time on their last shift. Most frequently left undone were: comforting or talking with patients (66%), educating patients (52%) and developing/updating nursing care plans (47%). The number of patients per registered nurse was significantly associated with the incidence of 'missed care' (p<0.001). A mean of 7.8 activities per shift were left undone on wards that are rated as 'failing' on patient safety, compared with 2.4 where patient safety was rated as 'excellent' (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nurses working in English hospitals report that care is frequently left undone. Care not being delivered may be the reason low nurse staffing levels adversely affects quality and safety. Hospitals could use a nurse-rated assessment of 'missed care' as an early warning measure to identify wards with inadequate nurse staffing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001767

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Hendrich A Chow M Maximising the impact of nursing quality: a closer look at the hospital work environment and the nurse's impact on patient-care quality. Healthc Leadersh White Paper Ser 2008; 4: 1– 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, J. E., Murrells, T., Rafferty, A. M., Morrow, E., & Griffiths, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Ball, Jane E
Venue
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-07-29
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
116-125
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5415
  • 2044-5423
OpenAlex
W2147808390
Cited by
666
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 5
FWCI
121.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • King's College London
  • European Commission
  • Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
missed nursing care, nurse staffing, nursing workload, time pressure, nursing care quality, patient education, nursing care plan, patient comfort, early warning indicators, hospital wards
MeSH terms
Continuity of Patient Care, England, Humans, National Health Programs, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Care Planning, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Health Care, Work Schedule Tolerance, Workload, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review