Cited by 79Mental Health and Patient InvolvementCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesHealth Policy Implementation Science

The interdependent roles of patients, families and professionals in cystic fibrosis: a system for the coproduction of healthcare and its improvement

Open access
Sabadosa, Kathryn A, Batalden, Paul B·2014·BMJ Quality & Safety

Abstract

A quality healthcare system is coproduced by patients, families and healthcare professionals working interdependently to cocreate and codeliver care. Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and families rely on healthcare professionals to provide the best possible care and timely, accurate information. They know that the care at home and in clinical settings needs to be seamless, using shared information and decisions. A parent's journey of better care begins with her son's diagnosis and moves to her involvement to improve the systems and processes of care for others. She reflects on this work and identifies five elements that contributed to the coproduction of improved care: (1) mental and emotional readiness to engage; (2) curiosity and the search for insight; (3) reframe challenges into opportunities for improvement; (4) listen and learn from everyone, bringing home what is relevant; and (5) personal participation. Joined with the reflections of an improvement scientist, they note that chronic care relies on informed, activated patients and prepared, proactive healthcare professionals working together and that it is more than ‘patient-centric’. They propose a model for the coimprovement of systems of care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002782

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabadosa, K. A., & Batalden, P. B.
Affiliations
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US)
Corresponding author
Sabadosa, Kathryn A
Venue
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-03-07
Volume
23
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
i90-i94
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5415
  • 2044-5423
OpenAlex
W2127152066
Cited by
79
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, patient engagement, family involvement, healthcare workers, patient activation, chronic care, shared decision-making, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Nurse-Patient Relations, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional-Family Relations, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Role, United States, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Interdisciplinary Communication, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review