The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature
Open accessAbstract
Since its publication in 2008, SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) has contributed to the completeness and transparency of reporting of quality improvement work, providing guidance to authors and reviewers of reports on healthcare improvement work. In the interim, enormous growth has occurred in understanding factors that influence the success, and failure, of healthcare improvement efforts. Progress has been particularly strong in three areas: the understanding of the theoretical basis for improvement work; the impact of contextual factors on outcomes; and the development of methodologies for studying improvement work. Consequently, there is now a need to revise the original publication guidelines. To reflect the breadth of knowledge and experience in the field, we solicited input from a wide variety of authors, editors and improvement professionals during the guideline revision process. This Explanation and Elaboration document (E&E) is a companion to the revised SQUIRE guidelines, SQUIRE 2.0. The product of collaboration by an international and interprofessional group of authors, this document provides examples from the published literature, and an explanation of how each reflects the intent of a specific item in SQUIRE. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist authors in writing clearly, precisely and completely about systematic efforts to improve the quality, safety and value of healthcare services. Authors can explore the SQUIRE statement, this E&E and related documents in detail at http://www.squire-statement.org.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010 · Cited by 17,796
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · cited 2×
“…to improve medication management in multimorbidity by general practitioners (GPs), in which we applied the steps of the BCW[Behaviour Change Wheel] 23 to enable a more transparent implementation of the MRC [Medical Research Council] framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions … .”
Self-citationHoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Self-citationAchieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117 · Cited by 7,219
Evaluating the quality of medical care
DONABEDIAN, A. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x · Cited by 6,102
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program
Starmer, A. J., Spector, N. D., Srivastava, R., West, D. C., Rosenbluth, G., Allen, A. D., Noble, E. L., Tse, L. L., Dalal, A. K., Keohane, C. A., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1405556 · Cited by 947 · cited 1×
“20 Interventions to improve patient experience, or to enhance team communication about patient safety 21 may also address quality problems, but in the absence of an established, evidence-based standard.”
Demystifying theory and its use in improvement
Davidoff, F., Dixon-Woods, M., Leviton, L., & Michie, S. (2015) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627 · Cited by 714
Self-citationThe problem of appraising qualitative research
Dixon-Woods, M. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.008714 · Cited by 653
Rycroft-Malone, J., Seers, K., Chandler, J., Hawkes, C. A., Crichton, N., Allen, C., Bullock, I., & Strunin, L. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-28 · Cited by 303
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1136/qshc.2008.029058 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.c869 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1373/49.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/qshc.8.2.76 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010 · DOI · Paper page
- Ogrinc G , Davies L , Goodman D , et al . SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 · DOI
- Davies L , Donnelly KZ , Goodman DJ , et al . Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117 doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000316 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.d195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000034 · doi:10.1097/anc.0000000000000034
- 10.1542/peds.2014-1192 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31828bc3bc · DOI
- 10.1186/s13012-015-0322-1 · DOI
- Zubkoff, 2014, Using a virtual breakthrough series collaborative to reduce postoperative respiratory failure in 16 Veterans Health Administration hospitals, Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 40, 11
- 10.1542/peds.2014-1162 · DOI
- Duncan, 2014, Improving delivery of bright futures preventive services at the 9- and 24-month well child visit, Pediatrics, 135, e178, 10.1542/peds.2013-3119 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003080 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.012 · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.012
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002364 · DOI
- Nelson, 1996, Improving health care, Part 1: the clinical value compass, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, 22, 243
- Pettigrew A WRMcfcs. Managing change for competitive success. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
- Robson C 2011. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley, 2011.
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003001 · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003001
- 10.1136/qshc.2008.029025 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001166 · DOI
- Donabedian A . Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbour, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001954 · DOI
- 10.1353/hcr.2006.0054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1512 · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.9.1512
- 10.7326/0003-4819-146-9-200705010-00155 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/intqhc/mzh075 · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh075
- 10.1136/qshc.2009.038034 · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.038034
- Fox, 2005, Recommendations for the ethical conduct of quality improvement, JClin Ethics, 16, 61, 10.1086/JCE200516107 · DOI
- 10.1093/intqhc/mzt037 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003556 · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003556
- 10.1370/afm.1492 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1542/peds.2013-3833 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2013-2494 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001404 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002345 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002352 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001610 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1878 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.015 · Cited by 366
Self-citationSatalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072764 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, D., Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Baker, G. R., Barnsteiner, J., Foster, T. C., Gali, K., Hilden, J., Horwitz, L., Kaplan, H. C., Leis, J., Matulis, J. C., Michie, S., Miltner, R., Neily, J., Nelson, W. A., Niedner, M., Oliver, B., Rutman, L., Thomson, R., & Thor, J.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e7-e7
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2341143633
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 51.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Health Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004480
- The paper
- Goodman, D., Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Baker, G. R., Barnsteiner, J., Foster, T. C., Gali, K., Hilden, J., Horwitz, L., Kaplan, H. C., Leis, J., Matulis, J. C., Michie, S., Miltner, R., Neily, J., Nelson, W. A., Niedner, M., Oliver, B., Rutman, L., . . . Thor, J. (2016). Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.