Cited by 687Health Policy Implementation ScienceMethodologies in Health Research and PracticeEducational Research and Methods

Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base

Open access
Shorten, Allison, Smith, Joanna·2017·Evidence Based Nursing

Abstract

‘Mixed methods’ is a research approach whereby researchers collect and analyse both quantitative and qualitative data within the same study. Growth of mixed methods research in nursing and healthcare has occurred at a time of internationally increasing complexity in healthcare delivery. Mixed methods research draws on potential strengths of both qualitative and quantitative methods, allowing researchers to explore diverse perspectives and uncover relationships that exist between the intricate layers of our multifaceted research questions. As providers and policy makers strive to ensure quality and safety for patients and families, researchers can use mixed methods to explore contemporary healthcare trends and practices across increasingly diverse practice settings. This article will outline common types of mixed methods designs and provide examples of how nursing researchers can apply different mixed methods designs in order to answer important nursing practice questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/eb-2017-102699

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Andrew S, Halcomb EJ. Mixed Method Research. In: Borbasi S, Jackson D, eds. Navigating the maze of research: enhancing nursing & midwifery practice. 3rd ed. Marrickville, New South Wales: Elsevier, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shorten, A., & Smith, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Shorten, Allison
Venue
Evidence Based Nursing
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-06-14
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
74-75
ISSN
  • 1367-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-9618
OpenAlex
W2680541203
Cited by
687
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
mixed methods, research design, evidence base, nursing research, patient safety, nursing practice questions, qualitative-quantitative integration
MeSH terms
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Nursing Care, Research Design, Nursing Research, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review