Cited by 43Migration, Health and TraumaHealth and Conflict StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

Evidence-based mental health and psychosocial support in humanitarian settings: gaps and opportunities

Tol, Wietse A, van Ommeren, Mark·2012·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

Research in humanitarian settings – referred to here as areas affected by disasters and armed conflicts – has shown diverse impacts of such crises on the mental health and psychosocial well-being of populations. These consequences range from resilience (good mental health despite exposure to significant adversity), non-disordered psychological distress, to increased mental disorders, including anxiety (eg, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)), depressive, and substance use disorders.1,–,3 In addition, mental health practitioners in humanitarian settings frequently encounter people with severe pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders (eg, psychotic disorders and epilepsy).4 Moreover, disasters and armed conflicts have been shown to impact the social conditions that shape mental health, through increased poverty, threats to human rights, domestic and community violence and changed social relations.5 To address negative impacts, mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) programmes are increasingly a standard component of humanitarian response. MHPSS has been defined as ‘any type of local or outside support that aims to protect or promote psychosocial well-being and/or prevent or treat mental disorder’.6 There appears to be increasing consensus on best practices, as indicated by the publication of two sets of international guidelines; the 2007 Inter-Agency Standing Committee Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings6 and the 2011 Sphere Handbook.7 In this editorial, we discuss the emerging field of MHPSS from the perspective of evidence-based practice. We describe challenges to evidence-based MHPSS practice, and highlight areas where concerted action may either (A) improve the quality of MHPSS programming (by basing decision-making on research findings) and/or (B) improve MHPSS research efforts (by making the pursuit of reliable and valid knowledge more responsive to needs of affected populations). We structure the discussion in accordance with steps of the programme cycle where empirical evidence may support decision-making, that is needs …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmental-2012-100644

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychiatric epidemiological research on populations displaced from South Sudan in previous conflicts suggested high prevalence of common mental disorders (depression, PTSD, anxiety), although the use of non-validated cut-off scores for the population may mean that psychological distress and mental disorders are conflated in these studies.

    “The psychiatric epidemiological research on populations displaced from South Sudan in previous conflicts suggested high prevalence of common mental disorders (depression, PTSD, anxiety), although the use of non-validated cut-off scores for the population may mean that psychological distress and mental disorders are conflated in these studies [24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tol, W. A., & van Ommeren, M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Tol, Wietse A
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-03-26
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
25-26
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W2318237773
Cited by
43
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
mental health and psychosocial support, humanitarian settings, disasters, armed conflict, evidence-based practice, psychosocial well-being, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, substance use disorders, neuropsychiatric disorders, research gaps, needs assessment
MeSH terms
Altruism, Humans, Mental Health, Social Support, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review