Cited by 64Digital Mental Health InterventionsProblem Solving Skills DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

App-based guided problem-solving intervention for adolescent mental health: a pilot cohort study in Indian schools

Open access
Gonsalves, Pattie P, Hodgson, Eleanor Sara, Bhat, Bhargav, Sharma, Rhea, Jambhale, Abhijeet, Michelson, Daniel, Patel, Vikram·2021·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

Background: This paper describes the pilot evaluation of ‘POD Adventures’, a lay counsellor-guided problem-solving intervention delivered via a smartphone app in Indian secondary schools. Objective: To test the feasibility and acceptability of POD Adventures for adolescents with a felt need for psychological support, and to explore the intervention’s effects on self-reported mental health symptoms, prioritised problems, stress and well-being. Methods: We used a mixed-methods pre-post cohort design. Participants were self-referred from grades 9–12 in two coeducational government-aided secondary schools in Goa, India. The intervention was delivered in two formats, ‘mixed’ (comprising individual and small group sessions) and ‘group’ (small group sessions only). Findings: 248 participants enrolled in the study and 230 (92.7%) completed the intervention. Outcomes at 4 weeks showed significant improvements on all measures that were maintained at 12 weeks. Large effects were observed on problem severity scores (4 weeks, d=1.47; 12 weeks, d=1.53) while small to moderate effects were seen on mental health symptoms, stress and well-being. 22 students completed qualitative interviews about their experience of the intervention. Participants found POD Adventures easy to use, engaging and helpful in solving their problems. They were satisfied with the guidance provided by the counsellor irrespective of delivery format. Conclusions: POD Adventures was feasible to deliver with guidance from lay counsellors in Indian schools, acceptable to participants and associated with large improvements in problem severity and mental health symptom severity. Clinical implications: POD Adventures has promise as an early intervention for adolescents with a felt need for psychological support in low-resource settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300194

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An alternative digital format of problem solving proved to be feasible and acceptable with in-person guidance, but remote delivery was less viable.

    “An alternative digital format of problem solving proved to be feasible and acceptable with in-person guidance, but remote delivery was less viable.”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [341]

    The Conclusions report that POD Adventures was feasible and acceptable with counsellor guidance in Indian schools. The Methods describe school-based sessions, not remote delivery, and the Conclusions propose exploring remote delivery in future. The paper therefore does not support the claim that remote delivery was found less viable. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The coach need not be a highly qualified therapist.

    “we argue that the coach need not be a highly qualified therapist (Gonsalves et al., 2021; Kazdin, 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonsalves, P. P., Hodgson, E. S., Bhat, B., Sharma, R., Jambhale, A., Michelson, D., & Patel, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Sangath (IN)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Gonsalves, Pattie P
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-11-18
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
11-18
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W3104516396
Cited by
64
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Wellcome Trust (106919/Z/15/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adolescent mental health, problem-solving intervention, mobile application, school-based mental health programs, stress, well-being, psychiatric symptoms, problem severity, feasibility and acceptability, resource-limited settings, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Mental Health, Pilot Projects, Schools, Cohort Studies, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review