Cited by 121Problem Solving Skills DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Effectiveness of a brief lay counsellor-delivered, problem-solving intervention for adolescent mental health problems in urban, low-income schools in India: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Michelson, Daniel, Malik, Kanika, Parikh, Rachana, Weiss, Helen A, Doyle, Aoife M, Bhat, Bhargav, Sahu, Rooplata, Chilhate, Bhagwant +9 more·2020·The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are a leading cause of disability in adolescents worldwide. Problem solving is a well-tested mental health intervention in many populations. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a brief, transdiagnostic problem-solving intervention for common adolescent mental health problems when delivered by non-specialist school counsellors in New Delhi, India. METHODS: This randomised trial was done in six government-run schools (three all-boys schools, two all-girls schools, and one co-educational school) that serve low-income communities. We recruited participants from grades 9 to 12 (ages 12-20 years) by selecting students with persistently elevated mental health symptoms accompanied by distress or functional impairment. Clinical eligibility criteria were assessed by research assistants using the Hindi-language version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), with reference to locally validated borderline cutoff scores of 19 or greater for boys and 20 or greater for girls on the SDQ Total Difficulties scale, an abnormal score of 2 or more on the SDQ Impact scale, and persistence of more than 1 month on the SDQ Chronicity index. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to problem solving delivered through a brief (2-3 week) counsellor-led intervention with supporting printed materials (intervention group), or problem solving delivered via printed booklets alone (control group). Primary outcomes were adolescent-reported mental health symptoms (SDQ Total Difficulties scale) and idiographic psychosocial problems (Youth Top Problems [YTP]) at 6 weeks. Primary analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis at the 6-week endpoint. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03630471. FINDINGS: Participants were enrolled between Aug 20, and Dec 4, 2018. 283 eligible adolescents were referred to the trial, and 251 (89%) of these were enrolled (mean age 15·61 years; 174 [69%] boys). 125 participants were allocated to each group (after accounting for one participant in the intervention group who withdrew consent after randomisation). Primary outcome data were available for 245 (98%) participants. At 6 weeks, the mean YTP scores were 3·52 (SD 2·66) in the intervention group and 4·60 (2·75) in the control group (adjusted mean difference -1·01, 95% CI -1·63 to -0·38; adjusted effect size 0·36, 95% CI 0·11 to 0·61; p=0·0015). The mean SDQ Total Difficulties scores were 17·48 (5·45) in the intervention group and 18·33 (5·45) in the control group (-0·86, -2·14 to 0·41; 0·16, -0·09 to 0·41; p=0·18). We observed no adverse events. INTERPRETATION: A brief lay counsellor-delivered problem-solving intervention combined with printed booklets seemed to have a modest effect on psychosocial outcomes among adolescents with diverse mental health problems compared with problem-solving booklets alone. This counsellor-delivered intervention might be a suitable first-line intervention in a stepped care approach, which is being evaluated in ongoing studies. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30173-5

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A fully powered randomised controlled trial showed that step one (a lay counsellor-delivered, brief problem-solving intervention) reduced youth-reported psychosocial problem severity and that these effects were sustained over a year.

    “A fully powered randomised controlled trial showed that step one (a lay counsellor-delivered, brief problem-solving intervention) reduced youth-reported psychosocial problem severity and that these effects were sustained over a year.”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [338]

    The Results report that the lay counsellor-delivered intervention reduced youth-reported psychosocial problem severity relative to booklets alone, with the difference remaining stable through 12 weeks. The Discussion says the 12-week follow-up was relatively short and that sustainability at 12 months would be assessed in a future study; this trial does not support the claimed one-year persistence. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michelson, D., Malik, K., Parikh, R., Weiss, H. A., Doyle, A. M., Bhat, B., Sahu, R., Chilhate, B., Mathur, S., Krishna, M., Sharma, R., Sudhir, P., King, M., Cuijpers, P., Chorpita, B., Fairburn, C. G., & Patel, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Sangath (IN)
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Patel, Vikram
Venue
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
571-582
ISSN
2352-4642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036153869
Cited by
121
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5
FWCI
28.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-09-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (106919/A/15/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10210)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/R010161/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
problem-solving intervention, adolescent mental health, school counselors, transdiagnostic treatment, low-income schools, urban schools, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, psychiatric symptoms, psychosocial problems, New Delhi, India, public schools, intervention effectiveness, school mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Counseling, Female, Humans, India, Male, Poverty, Problem Solving, Schools, Urban Health, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review