The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review of trends in emergency department attendances: an Australian perspective
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) in many developed countries are experiencing increasing pressure due to rising numbers of patient presentations and emergency admissions. Reported increases range up to 7% annually. Together with limited inpatient bed capacity, this contributes to prolonged lengths of stay in the ED; disrupting timely access to urgent care, posing a threat to patient safety. The aim of this review is to summarise the findings of studies that have investigated the extent of and the reasons for increasing emergency presentations. To do this, a systematic review and synthesis of published and unpublished reports describing trends and underlying drivers associated with the increase in ED presentations in developed countries was conducted. Most published studies provided evidence of increasing ED attendances within developed countries. A series of inter-related factors have been proposed to explain the increase in emergency demand. These include changes in demography and in the organisation and delivery of healthcare services, as well as improved health awareness and community expectations arising from health promotion campaigns. The factors associated with increasing ED presentations are complex and inter-related and include rising community expectations regarding access to emergency care in acute hospitals. A systematic investigation of the demographic, socioeconomic and health-related factors highlighted by this review is recommended. This would facilitate untangling the dynamics of the increase in emergency demand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Clinically Oriented Outcomes
Bernstein, S. L., Aronsky, D., Duseja, R., Epstein, S., Handel, D., Hwang, U., McCarthy, M., John McConnell, K., Pines, J. M., Rathlev, N., et al. (2009) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x · Cited by 1,147
Aminzadeh, F., & Dalziel, W. B. (2002) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1067/mem.2002.121523 · Cited by 1,119
Kushel, M. B., Perry, S., Bangsberg, D., Clark, R., & Moss, A. R. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.5.778 · Cited by 485
Cited by
Jennings, N., Clifford, S., Fox, A. R., O’Connell, J., & Gardner, G. (2015) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.006 · Cited by 269
Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: A novel prediction model
Parker, C. A., Liu, N., Wu, S. X., Shen, Y., Lam, S. S. W., & Ong, M. E. H. (2019) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060 · Cited by 100
A simple tool to predict admission at the time of triage
Cameron, A., Rodgers, K., Ireland, A., Jamdar, R., & McKay, G. A. (2015) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-203200 · Cited by 99
Barak-Corren, Y., Israelit, S. H., & Reis, B. Y. (2017) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2014-203819 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowthian, J. A., Curtis, A. J., Cameron, P. A., Stoelwinder, J. U., Cooke, M. W., & McNeil, J. J.
- Venue
- Emergency Medicine Journal
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-10-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 373-377
- ISSN
- 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-0205
- 1472-0213
- OpenAlex
- W2110342300
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic review of trends in emergency department attendances: an Australian perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/emj.2010.099226
- The paper
- Lowthian, J. A., Curtis, A. J., Cameron, P. A., Stoelwinder, J. U., Cooke, M. W., & McNeil, J. J. (2011). Systematic review of trends in emergency department attendances: an Australian perspective. Emergency Medicine Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2010.099226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.