The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stool microflora in extremely low birthweight infants
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To serially characterise aerobic and anaerobic stool microflora in extremely low birthweight infants and to correlate colonisation patterns with clinical risk factors. METHODS: Stool specimens from 29 infants of birthweight <1000 g were collected on days 10, 20, and 30 after birth. Quantitative aerobic and anaerobic cultures were performed. RESULTS: By day 30, predominant species were Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterbacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria spp were identified in only one infant. In breast milk fed (but not in formula fed) infants, the total number of bacterial species/stool specimen increased significantly with time (2.50 (SE 0.34) on day 10; 3.13 (0.38) on day 20; 4.27 (0.45) on day 30) as did quantitative bacterial counts; Gram negative species accounted for most of the increase. On day 30, significant inverse correlations were found between days of previous antibiotic treatment and number of bacterial species (r=0.491) and total organisms/g of stool (r=0.482). Gestational age, birthweight, maternal antibiotic or steroid treatment, prolonged rupture of the membranes, and mode of delivery did not seem to affect colonisation patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The gut of extremely low birthweight infants is colonised by a paucity of bacterial species. Breast milking and reduction of antibiotic exposure are critical to increasing fecal microbial diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yoshioka, H., Iseki, K.-I., & Fujita, K. (1983) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.72.3.317 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy
Penders, J., Thijs, C., Vink, C., Stelma, F. F., Snijders, B., Kummeling, I., van den Brandt, P. A., & Stobberingh, E. E. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2824 · Cited by 2,232
Safety assessment of probiotics for human use
Sanders, M. E., Akkermans, L. M. A., Haller, D., Hammerman, C., Heimbach, J. T., Hörmannsperger, G., & Huys, G. (2010) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 · Cited by 816
Lin, H.-C., Su, B.-H., Chen, A.-C., Lin, T.-W., Tsai, C.-H., Yeh, T.-F., & Oh, W. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1463 · Cited by 660
Oral Probiotics Prevent Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates
Bin-Nun, A., Bromiker, R., Wilschanski, M., Kaplan, M., Rudensky, B., Caplan, M., & Hammerman, C. (2005) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.03.054 · Cited by 590
A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India
Panigrahi, P., Parida, S., Nanda, N. C., Satpathy, R., Pradhan, L., Chandel, D. S., Baccaglini, L., Mohapatra, A., Mohapatra, S. S., Misra, P. R., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23480 · Cited by 526
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gewolb, I. H., Schwalbe, R. S., Taciak, V. L., Harrison, T. S., & Panigrahi, P.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- F167-F173
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W1968088790
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.