The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Superior vena cava flow in newborn infants: a novel marker of systemic blood flow
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular outputs cannot be used to assess systemic blood flow in preterm infants because they are confounded by shunts through the ductus arteriosus and atrial septum. However, flow measurements in the superior vena cava (SVC) can assess blood returning from the upper body and brain. OBJECTIVES: To describe a Doppler echocardiographic technique that measures blood flow in the SVC, to test its reproducibility, and to establish normal ranges. DESIGN: SVC flow was assessed together with right ventricular output and atrial or ductal shunting. Normal range was established in 14 infants born after 36 weeks' gestation (2 measurements taken in the first 48 hours) and 25 uncomplicated infants born before 30 weeks (4 measurements taken in the first 48 hours). Intra-observer and interobserver variability were tested in 20 preterm infants. RESULTS: In 14 infants born after 36 weeks, median SVC flow rose from 76 ml/kg/min on day 1 to 93 ml/kg/min on day 2; in 25 uncomplicated very preterm infants, it rose from 62 ml/kg/min at 5 hours to 86 ml/kg/min at 48 hours. The lowest SVC flow for the preterm babies rose from 30 ml/kg/min at 5 hours to 46 ml/kg/min by 48 hours. Median intra-observer and interobserver variability were 8.1% and 14%, respectively. In preterm babies with a closed duct, SVC flow was a mean of 37% of left ventricular output and the two measures correlated significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This technique can assess blood flow from the upper body, including the brain, in the crucial early postnatal period, and might allow more accurate assessment of the status of systemic blood flow and response to treatment. Key messages: Superior vena cava flow offers a non-invasive means to assess systemic blood flow in newborn infants Superior vena cava flow increases over the first 48 hours in well term and preterm infants
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Singh, Y., Tissot, C., Fraga, M. V., Yousef, N., Cortes, R. G., Lopez, J., Sanchez-de-Toledo, J., Brierley, J., Colunga, J. M., Raffaj, D., et al. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9 · Cited by 659
Frankel, H. L., Kirkpatrick, A. W., Elbarbary, M., Blaivas, M., Desai, H., Evans, D., Summerfield, D. T., Slonim, A., Breitkreutz, R., Price, S., et al. (2015) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001216 · Cited by 494
Osborn, D. A., Evans, N., & Kluckow, M. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.1.33 · Cited by 269
Self-citationEchocardiographic Evaluation of Hemodynamics in Neonates and Children
Singh, Y. (2017) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2017.00201 · Cited by 116
Ficial, B., Finnemore, A. E., Cox, D. J., Broadhouse, K. M., Price, A. N., Durighel, G., Ekitzidou, G., Hajnal, J. V., Edwards, A. D., & Groves, A. M. (2013) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.08.019 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluckow, M., & Evans, N.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- F182-F187
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2121868185
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superior vena cava flow in newborn infants: a novel marker of systemic blood flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/fn.82.3.f182
- The paper
- Kluckow, M., & Evans, N. (2000). Superior vena cava flow in newborn infants: a novel marker of systemic blood flow. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.82.3.f182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.