The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims: Major liver resection incurs a risk of postoperative liver dysfunction and infection and there is a lack of objective evidence relating residual liver volume to these complications. Patients and methods: Liver volumetry was performed on computer models derived from computed tomography (CT) angioportograms of 104 patients with normal synthetic liver function scheduled for liver resection. Relative residual liver volume (%RLV) was calculated as the relation of residual to total functional liver volume and related to postoperative hepatic dysfunction and infection. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was undertaken to determine the critical %RLV predicting severe hepatic dysfunction and infection. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to delineate perioperative predictors of severe hepatic dysfunction and infection. Results: The incidence of severe hepatic dysfunction and infection following liver resection increased significantly with smaller %RLV. A critical %RLV of 26.6% was identified as associated with severe hepatic dysfunction (p<0.0001). Additionally, body mass index (BMI), operating time, and intraoperative blood loss were significant prognostic indicators for severe hepatic dysfunction. It was not possible to predict the individual risk of postoperative infection precisely by %RLV. However, in patients undergoing major liver resection, infection was significantly more common in those who developed postoperative severe hepatic dysfunction compared with those who did not (p = 0.030). Conclusions: The likelihood of severe hepatic dysfunction following liver resection can be predicted by a small %RLV and a high BMI whereas postoperative infection is more related to liver dysfunction than precise residual liver volume. Understanding the relationship between liver volume and synthetic and immune function is the key to improving the safety of major liver resection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone, R. C., Balk, R. A., Cerra, F. B., Dellinger, R. P., Fein, A. M., Knaus, W. A., Schein, R. M. H., & Sibbald, W. J. (1992) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 · Cited by 13,198
2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference
Levy, M. M., Fink, M. P., Marshall, J. C., Abraham, E., Angus, D., Cook, D., Cohen, J., Opal, S. M., Vincent, J.-L., & Ramsay, G. (2003) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000050454.01978.3b · Cited by 5,995
Fong, Y., Fortner, J., Sun, R. L., Brennan, M. F., & Blumgart, L. H. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199909000-00004 · Cited by 3,715
2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference
Conference, F. T. I. S. D., Levy, M. M., Fink, M. P., Marshall, J. C., Abraham, E., Angus, D., Cook, D., Cohen, J., Opal, S. M., Vincent, J.-L., et al. (2003) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x · Cited by 2,871
Ferenci, P., Lockwood, A., Mullen, K., Tarter, R., Weissenborn, K., & Blei, A. T. (2002) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2002.31250 · Cited by 2,043
Medzhitov, R., & Janeway, C. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200008033430506 · Cited by 1,825
Jarnagin, W. R., Gönen, M., Fong, Y., DeMatteo, R. P., Ben‐Porat, L., Little, S., Corvera, C. U., Weber, S., & Blumgart, L. H. (2002) · PubMed · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000029003.66466.b3 · Cited by 1,474
Trends in Long-Term Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
Choti, M. A., Sitzmann, J. V., Tiburi, M. F., Sumetchotimetha, W., Rangsin, R., Schulick, R. D., Lillemoe, K. D., Yeo, C. J., & Cameron, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200206000-00002 · Cited by 1,454
Belghiti, J., Hiramatsu, K., Benoist, S., Massault, P. P., Sauvanet, A., & Farges, O. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00261-1 · Cited by 1,051
Kubota, K., Makuuchi, M., Kusaka, K., Kobayashi, T., Miki, K., Hasegawa, K., Harihara, Y., & Takayama, T. (1997) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510260514 · Cited by 730
Cited by
Rahbari, N. N., Garden, O. J., Padbury, R., Brooke-Smith, M., Crawford, M., Adam, R., Koch, M., Makuuchi, M., Dematteo, R. P., Christophi, C., et al. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001 · Cited by 2,319
Self-citationBalzan, S., Belghiti, J., Farges, O., Ogata, S., Sauvanet, A., Delefosse, D., & Durand, F. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e · Cited by 1,027
Kraus, V. B., Blanco, F. J., Englund, M., Karsdal, M. A., & Lohmander, L. S. (2015) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.036 · Cited by 658
Kishi, Y., Abdalla, E. K., Chun, Y. S., Zorzi, D., Madoff, D. C., Wallace, M. J., Curley, S. A., & Vauthey, J.-N. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b674df · Cited by 516
Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases
Garden, O. J. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2006.098053 · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schindl, M. J., Redhead, D. N., Fearon, K. C. H., Garden, O. J., & Wigmore, S. J.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-01-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-296
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2103011157
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2004.046524
- The paper
- Schindl, M. J., Redhead, D. N., Fearon, K. C. H., Garden, O. J., & Wigmore, S. J. (2005). The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.046524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
