Cited by 67Liver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

Limited therapeutic efficacy of pioglitazone on progression of hepatic fibrosis in rats

Open access
Leclercq, I A·2006·Gut

Abstract

AIM: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists have been shown to prevent hepatic fibrosis in rodents. We evaluated the therapeutic antifibrotic potential of the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone on established hepatic fibrosis. METHODS: Repeated injections of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), a choline deficient diet, or bile duct ligation (BDL) were used to induce hepatic fibrosis in rats. Pioglitazone treatment was introduced at various time points. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed by comparison of the severity of hepatic fibrosis in pioglitazone treated versus untreated fibrotic controls. RESULTS: When introduced after two weeks of CCl4, pioglitazone reduced hepatic fibrosis, OH proline content, hepatic mRNA expression of collagen type I, and profibrotic genes, as well as the number of activated alpha smooth muscle actin positive hepatic stellate cells, compared with rats receiving CCl4 only, with no significant change in necroinflammation. When pioglitazone treatment was initiated after five weeks of CCl4, no antifibrotic effect was observed. Similarly, pioglitazone was associated with a reduced severity of fibrosis induced by a choline deficient diet when introduced early, while delayed treatment with pioglitazone remained ineffective. In contrast, pioglitazone failed to interrupt progression of fibrosis due to BDL, irrespective of the timing of its administration. CONCLUSION: In rats, the therapeutic antifibrotic efficacy of pioglitazone is limited and dependent on the type of injury, duration of disease, and/or the severity of fibrosis at the time of initiation of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2005.079194

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same PPARγ agonist failed to achieve beneficial results in a bile duct ligation model.

    “In contrast to these findings, the same PPARγ agonist failed to achieve beneficial results in a bile duct ligation model.[138].”

    From Nuclear receptors in liver fibrosis (2021) · cites this paper as [138]

  • Pioglitazone reduces hepatic fibrosis in a CCl4 and choline deficient diet model.

    “the PPAR-γ agonist Pioglitazone was even shown to reduce hepatic fibrosis in a CCl 4 and choline deficient diet model and decrease pro-fibrotic gene expression (e.g., col1α1, αSma).[138]”

    From Nuclear receptors in liver fibrosis (2021) · cites this paper as [138]

  • Pioglitazone decreases pro-fibrotic gene expression such as col1α1 and αSma in that model.

    “the PPAR-γ agonist Pioglitazone was even shown to reduce hepatic fibrosis in a CCl 4 and choline deficient diet model and decrease pro-fibrotic gene expression (e.g., col1α1, αSma).[138]”

    From Nuclear receptors in liver fibrosis (2021) · cites this paper as [138]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Uchimura K, Nakamuta M, Enjoji M, et al. Activation of retinoic X receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma inhibits nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in rat Kupffer cells. Hepatology 2001;33:91-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leclercq, I. A.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Leclercq, I A
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-02-16
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
1020-1029
ISSN
0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121396535
Cited by
67
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Keywords
pioglitazone, liver fibrosis, PPARγ agonists, antifibrotic therapy, treatment timing, carbon tetrachloride, choline-deficient diet, bile duct ligation, hepatic stellate cells, type I collagen, hydroxyproline, therapeutic window
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Animals, Bile Ducts, Carbon Tetrachloride, Choline, Hypoglycemic Agents, Ligation, Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental, Male, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Disease Progression, Collagen Type I, Thiazolidinediones, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review