The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Malignancy in coeliac disease--effect of a gluten free diet.
Open accessAbstract
Two hundred and ten patients with coeliac disease previously reported from this unit were reviewed at the end of 1985 after a further 11 years of follow up. The initial review at the end of 1974 could not demonstrate that a gluten free diet (GFD) prevented these complications, probably because the time on diet was relatively short. The same series has therefore been kept under surveillance with the particular aim of assessing the effects of diet on malignancy after a further prolonged follow up period. Twelve new cancers have occurred: of which one was a carcinoma of the oesophagus and two lymphomas. Thirty nine cancers developed in 38 patients and of 69 deaths, 33 were the result of malignancy. A two-fold relative risk (RR) of cancer was found and was because of an increased risk of cancer of the mouth and pharynx (RR = 9.7, p less than 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.0-28.3), oesophagus (RR = 12.3, p less than 0.01, CI = 2.5-36.5), and of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 42.7, p less than 0.001, CI = 19.6-81.4). The results indicate that for coeliac patients who have taken a GFD for five years or more the risk of developing cancer over all sites is not increased when compared with the general population. The risk is increased, however, in those taking a reduced gluten, or a normal diet, with an excess of cancers of the mouth, pharynx and oesophagus (RR = 22.7, p < 0.001), and also of lymphoma (RR = 77.8, p < 0.001). A significant decreasing trend in the excess morbidity rate over increasing use of a GFD was found. The results are suggestive of a protective role for a GFD against malignancy in coeliac disease and give further support for advising all patients to adhere to a strict GFD for life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sanders, D. S., Carter, M. J., Hurlstone, D. P., Pearce, A., Ward, A. M., McAlindon, M. E., & Lobo, A. J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06581-3 · Cited by 390
Evidence of poor vitamin status in coeliac patients on a gluten‐free diet for 10 years
Hallert, C., Grant, C., Grehn, S., Grännö, C., Hultén, S., Midhagen, G., Ström, M., Svensson, H., & Valdimarsson, T. (2002) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01283.x · Cited by 323
The impact of a gluten‐free diet on adults with coeliac disease: results of a national survey
Zarkadas, M., Cranney, A., Case, S., Molloy, M., Switzer, C., Graham, I. D., Butzner, J. D., Rashid, M., Warren, R. E., & Burrows, V. (2006) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2006.00659.x · Cited by 257
Limited availability and higher cost of gluten‐free foods
Singh, J., & Whelan, K. (2011) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2011.01160.x · Cited by 238
Biagi, F., Bianchi, P. I., Marchese, A., Trotta, L., Vattiato, C., Balduzzi, D., Brusco, G., Andrealli, A., Cisarò, F., Astegiano, M., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114511007367 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, G. K., Prior, P., Lane, M. R., Pope, D., & Allan, R. N.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-338
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2043583169
- Cited by
- 956
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malignancy in coeliac disease--effect of a gluten free diet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.30.3.333
- The paper
- Holmes, G. K., Prior, P., Lane, M. R., Pope, D., & Allan, R. N. (1989). Malignancy in coeliac disease--effect of a gluten free diet. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.30.3.333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.