The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Escherichia coli strains colonising the gastrointestinal tract protect germfree mice against Salmonella typhimurium infection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli is part of the normal gastrointestinal microflora which exerts a barrier effect against enteropathogens. Several E coli strains develop a protective effect against other Enterobacteriaceae. AIMS: Two E coli strains, EM0, a human faecal strain, and JM105 K-12 were tested for their ability to prevent in vivo and in vitro infection by Salmonella typhimurium C5. METHODS: Inhibition of C5 cell invasion by E coli was investigated in vitro using Caco-2/TC7 cells. The protective effect of E coli was examined in vivo in germfree or conventional C3H/He/Oujco mice orally infected by the lethal strain C5. RESULTS: EMO expresses haemolysin and cytotoxic necrotising factor in vitro. In vitro, the two strains did not prevent the growth of C5 by secreted microcins or modified cell invasion of C5. In vivo, establishment of EM0 or JM105 in the gut of germfree mice resulted in a significant increase in the number of surviving mice: 11/12 and 9/12, respectively, at 58 days after infection (2x10(6)/mouse) versus 0/12 in control germfree group at 13 days after infection. Colonisation level and translocation rate of C5 were significantly reduced during the three days after infection. In contrast, no reduction in faecal C5 excretion was observed in C5 infected conventional mice (1x10(8)/mouse) receiving the EM0 or JM105 cultures daily. CONCLUSIONS: Establishment of E coli strains, which do not display antimicrobial activity, protects germfree mice against infection and delays the establishment of C5 in the gut. Possible mechanisms of defence are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stark, P. L., & Lee, A. (1982) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-15-2-189 · Cited by 616
Yoshioka, H., Iseki, K.-I., & Fujita, K. (1983) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.72.3.317 · Cited by 516
Hudault, S., Liévin, V, Bernet-Camard, M. F., & Servin, A. L. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.2.513-518.1997 · Cited by 329
Cited by
The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli
Tenaillon, O., Skurnik, D., Picard, B., & Denamur, E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2298 · Cited by 1,533
Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens
Servin, A. L. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003 · Cited by 1,236
Liévin-Le Moal, V., & Servin, A. L. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.2.315-337.2006 · Cited by 568
Carbon nutrition of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine
Chang, D.-E., Smalley, D. J., Tucker, D. L., Leatham, M. P., Norris, W. E., Stevenson, S. J., Anderson, A. B., Grissom, J. E., Laux, D. C., Cohen, P. S., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307888101 · Cited by 512
Escherichia coli as an indicator of bacteriological quality of water: an overview
Odonkor, S. T., & Ampofo, J. K. (2013) · Microbiology Research · doi:10.4081/mr.2013.e2 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudault, S.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-55
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029256626
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Escherichia coli strains colonising the gastrointestinal tract protect germfree mice against Salmonella typhimurium infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.49.1.47
- The paper
- Hudault, S. (2001). Escherichia coli strains colonising the gastrointestinal tract protect germfree mice against Salmonella typhimurium infection. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.49.1.47
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.