Cited by 568Gut microbiota and healthAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The Front Line of Enteric Host Defense against Unwelcome Intrusion of Harmful Microorganisms: Mucins, Antimicrobial Peptides, and Microbiota

Open access
Liévin-Le Moal, Vanessa, Servin, Alain L.·2006·Clinical Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

SUMMARY: The intestinal tract is a complex ecosystem that combines resident microbiota and the cells of various phenotypes with complex metabolic activities that line the epithelial wall. The intestinal cells that make up the epithelium provide physical and chemical barriers that protect the host against the unwanted intrusion of microorganisms that hijack the cellular molecules and signaling pathways of the host and become pathogenic. Some of the organisms making up the intestinal microbiota also have microbicidal effects that contribute to the barrier against enteric pathogens. This review describes the two cell lineages present in the intestinal epithelium: the goblet cells and the Paneth cells, both of which play a pivotal role in the first line of enteric defense by producing mucus and antimicrobial peptides, respectively. We also analyze recent insights into the intestinal microbiota and the mechanisms by which some resident species act as a barrier to enteric pathogens. Moreover, this review examines whether the cells producing mucins or antimicrobial peptides and the resident microbiota act in partnership and whether they function individually and/or synergistically to provide the host with an effective front line of defense against harmful enteric pathogens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/cmr.19.2.315-337.2006

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liévin-Le Moal, V., & Servin, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 756, Signalisation et Physiopathologie des Cellules Epithéliales, Faculté de Pharmacie Paris XI, F-92296 Chātenay-Malabry, France
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Published
2006-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
315-337
ISSN
  • 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6618
OpenAlex
W2129785704
Cited by
568
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 33
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
intestinal epithelial barrier, mucin, antimicrobial peptides, gut microbiota, goblet cells, Paneth cells, mucus, enteric pathogens, host defense
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibiosis, Bacteria, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Intestinal Diseases, Intestinal Mucosa, Mucins, Species Specificity, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Paneth Cells, Goblet Cells, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review