Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 764

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut microbiome analysis as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for early hepatocellular carcinoma

Open access
Ren, Zhigang, Li, Ang, Jiang, Jianwen, Zhou, Lin, Yu, Zujiang, Lu, Haifeng, Xie, Haiyang, Chen, Xiaolong, Shao, Li, Zhang, Ruiqing, Xu, Shaoyan, Zhang, Hua, Cui, Guangying, Chen, Xinhua, Sun, Ranran, Wen, Hao, Lerut, Jan P, Kan, Quancheng, Li, Lanjuan, Zheng, Shusen·2019·Gut

Abstract

Objective: To characterise gut microbiome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate the potential of microbiome as non-invasive biomarkers for HCC. Design: We collected 486 faecal samples from East China, Central China and Northwest China prospectively and finally 419 samples completed Miseq sequencing. We characterised gut microbiome, identified microbial markers and constructed HCC classifier in 75 early HCC, 40 cirrhosis and 75 healthy controls. We validated the results in 56 controls, 30 early HCC and 45 advanced HCC. We further verified diagnosis potential in 18 HCC from Xinjiang and 80 HCC from Zhengzhou. Results: Faecal microbial diversity was increased from cirrhosis to early HCC with cirrhosis. Phylum Actinobacteria was increased in early HCC versus cirrhosis. Correspondingly, 13 genera including Gemmiger and Parabacteroides were enriched in early HCC versus cirrhosis. Butyrate-producing genera were decreased, while genera producing-lipopolysaccharide were increased in early HCC versus controls. The optimal 30 microbial markers were identified through a fivefold cross-validation on a random forest model and achieved an area under the curve of 80.64% between 75 early HCC and 105 non-HCC samples. Notably, gut microbial markers validated strong diagnosis potential for early HCC and even advanced HCC. Importantly, microbial markers successfully achieved a cross-region validation of HCC from Northwest China and Central China. Conclusions: This study is the first to characterise gut microbiome in patients with HCC and to report the successful diagnosis model establishment and cross-region validation of microbial markers for HCC. Gut microbiota-targeted biomarkers represent potential non-invasive tools for early diagnosis of HCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315084

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 764

Metadata

Authors
Ren, Z., Li, A., Jiang, J., Zhou, L., Yu, Z., Lu, H., Xie, H., Chen, X., Shao, L., Zhang, R., Xu, S., Zhang, H., Cui, G., Chen, X., Sun, R., Wen, H., Lerut, J. P., Kan, Q., Li, L., & Zheng, S.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
1014-1023
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2883291178
Cited by
764
References
20
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gut microbiome analysis as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for early hepatocellular carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315084
The paper
Ren, Z., Li, A., Jiang, J., Zhou, L., Yu, Z., Lu, H., Xie, H., Chen, X., Shao, L., Zhang, R., Xu, S., Zhang, H., Cui, G., Chen, X., Sun, R., Wen, H., Lerut, J. P., Kan, Q., Li, L., & Zheng, S. (2019). Gut microbiome analysis as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315084

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.