The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health
Open accessAbstract
The human gut microbiome is a complex ecosystem, densely colonised by thousands of microbial species. It varies among individuals and depends on host genotype and environmental factors, such as diet and antibiotics. In this review, we focus on stability and resilience as essential ecological characteristics of the gut microbiome and its relevance for human health. Microbial diversity, metabolic flexibility, functional redundancy, microbe–microbe and host–microbe interactions seem to be critical for maintaining resilience. The equilibrium of the gut ecosystem can be disrupted by perturbations, such as antibiotic therapy, causing significant decreases in functional richness and microbial diversity as well as impacting metabolic health. As a consequence, unbalanced states or even unhealthy stable states can develop, potentially leading to or supporting diseases. Accordingly, strategies have been developed to manipulate the gut microbiome in order to prevent or revert unhealthy states caused by perturbations, including faecal microbiota transplantation, supplementation with probiotics or non-digestible carbohydrates, and more extensive dietary modifications. Nevertheless, an increasing number of studies has evidenced interindividual variability in extent and direction of response to diet and perturbations, which has been attributed to the unique characteristics of each individual’s microbiome. From a clinical, translational perspective, the ability to improve resilience of the gut microbial ecosystem prior to perturbations, or to restore its equilibrium afterwards, would offer significant benefits. To be effective, this therapeutic approach will likely need a personalised or subgroup-based understanding of individual genetics, diet, gut microbiome and other environmental factors that might be involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing
MetaHIT Consortium, Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08821 · Cited by 11,624
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome
David, L. A., Maurice, C. F., Carmody, R. N., Gootenberg, D. B., Button, J. E., Wolfe, B. E., Ling, A. V., Devlin, A. S., Varma, Y., Fischbach, M. A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12820 · Cited by 10,100
Hill (2014) · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 · Cited by 9,592
Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography
Yatsunenko, T., Rey, F. E., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Contreras, M., Magris, M., Hidalgo, G., Baldassano, R. N., Anokhin, A. P., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11053 · Cited by 7,815
From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites
Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P., & Bäckhed, F. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041 · Cited by 7,070
Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes
Wu, G. D., Chen, J., Hoffmann, C., Bittinger, K., Chen, Y.-Y., Keilbaugh, S. A., Bewtra, M., Knights, D., Walters, W. A., Knight, R., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208344 · Cited by 6,513
Gibson, G. R., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M. E., Prescott, S. L., Reimer, R. A., Salminen, S. J., Scott, K., Stanton, C., Swanson, K. S., Cani, P. D., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75 · Cited by 5,634
Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K., & Knight, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11550 · Cited by 5,533
Early-warning signals for critical transitions
Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E. H., Rietkerk, M., & Sugihara, G. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08227 · Cited by 4,854
Cited by
Microbiome diversity protects against pathogens by nutrient blocking
Spragge, F., Bakkeren, E., Jahn, M. T., B. N. Araujo, E., Pearson, C. F., Wang, X., Pankhurst, L., Cunrath, O., & Foster, K. R. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adj3502 · Cited by 435
Effects of Probiotics on Gut Microbiota: An Overview
Chandrasekaran, P., Weiskirchen, S., & Weiskirchen, R. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25116022 · Cited by 382
Ma, Z., Zuo, T., Frey, N., & Rangrez, A. Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01946-6 · Cited by 259
Che, J., Shi, J., Fang, C., Zeng, X., Wu, Z., Du, Q., Tu, M., & Pan, D. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12040704 · Cited by 52
Gut microbiota resilience and recovery after anticancer chemotherapy
Roggiani, S., Mengoli, M., Conti, G., Fabbrini, M., Brigidi, P., Barone, M., D'Amico, F., & Turroni, S. (2023) · Microbiome Research Reports · doi:10.20517/mrr.2022.23 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Fassarella, M., Blaak, E. E., Penders, J., Nauta, A., Smidt, H., & Zoetendal, E. G.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-10-13
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 595-605
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W3092327810
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321747
- The paper
- Fassarella, M., Blaak, E. E., Penders, J., Nauta, A., Smidt, H., & Zoetendal, E. G. (2021). Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
