Cited by 25Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseGut microbiota and healthMicroscopic Colitis

Response to faecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis is not sustained long term following induction therapy

Haifer, Craig, Saikal, Aiasha, Paramsothy, Ramesh, Kaakoush, Nadeem O, Leong, Rupert W, Borody, Thomas J, Kamm, Michael A, Paramsothy, Sudarshan·2021·Gut

Abstract

We read with interest the paper by Ng et al, 1 which discussed the need to optimise faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) processes in order to increase its therapeutic potential, especially in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While there is randomised controlled trial evidence that FMT can be effective in the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC),2–5 the durability of therapeutic response following FMT cessation is unknown. Furthermore, there is limited long-term safety data following FMT, especially in patients with IBD. In the FOCUS study, FMT delivered via an initial colonoscopy infusion, followed by enema therapy for 8 weeks was effective in mild to moderate UC remission induction.2 Here, we report the long-term outcomes from the FOCUS study. Enrolled study participants who received FMT (2013–2015) were contacted to assess time to disease relapse for patients in clinical remission following FMT induction (defined as worsening symptoms requiring escalation of medical therapy or surgery), disease progression and the development of adverse events or new medical conditions. Long-term data were obtained from 87% (68/78) of participants who received FMT, with a median follow-up of …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323581

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haifer, C., Saikal, A., Paramsothy, R., Kaakoush, N. O., Leong, R. W., Borody, T. J., Kamm, M. A., & Paramsothy, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Blacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital (AU)
  • Centre For Digestive Diseases (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Paramsothy, Sudarshan
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
70
Issue
11
Pages
2210-2211
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W3110831975
Cited by
25
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, remission induction, long-term outcomes, recurrence, enema therapy, FOCUS study, long-term safety
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Colitis, Ulcerative, Feces, Humans, Induction Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review