Cited by 129Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The first international Rome consensus conference on gut microbiota and faecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease

Open access

Abstract

Background: Several randomised clinical trials (RCTs) performing faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly for ulcerative colitis, have recently been published, but with major variations in study design. These include differences in administered dose, route and frequency of delivery, type of placebo and evaluated endpoints. Although the overall outcomes appear to be promising, they are highly dependent on both donor and recipient factors. Objective: To develop concensus-based statements and recommendations for the evaluation, management and potential treatment of IBD using FMT in order to move towards standardised practices. Design: An international panel of experts convened several times to generate evidence-based guidelines by performing a deep evaluation of currently available and/or published data. Twenty-five experts in IBD, immunology and microbiology collaborated in different working groups to provide statements on the following key issues related to FMT in IBD: (A) pathogenesis and rationale, (B) donor selection and biobanking, (C) FMT practices and (D) consideration of future studies and perspectives. Statements were evaluated and voted on by all members using an electronic Delphi process, culminating in a plenary consensus conference and generation of proposed guidelines. Results and conclusions: Our group has provided specific statements and recommendations, based on best available evidence, with the end goal of providing guidance and general criteria required to promote FMT as a recognised strategy for the treatment of IBD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329948

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 66 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Lopetuso, L. R., Deleu, S., Godny, L., Petito, V., Puca, P., Facciotti, F., Sokol, H., Ianiro, G., Masucci, L., Abreu, M., Dotan, I., Costello, S. P., Hart, A., Iqbal, T. H., Paramsothy, S., Sanguinetti, M., Danese, S., Tilg, H., Cominelli, F., Pizarro, T. T., Armuzzi, A., Cammarota, G., Gasbarrini, A., Vermeire, S., & Scaldaferri, F.
Affiliations
  • Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • St Mark's Hospital (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Humanitas University (IT)
Corresponding author
Lopetuso, Loris Riccardo
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-06-20
Volume
72
Issue
9
Pages
1642-1650
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W4381332205
Cited by
129
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 8
FWCI
21.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
CCF Clinical Research Investigator-Initiated Award (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, gut microbiota, donor selection
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Colitis, Ulcerative, Humans, Rome, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review