Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 72Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in suspected or known coronary artery disease

Open access
Sabharwal, N K, Lahiri, A·2003·Heart

Abstract

Nuclear cardiology is an evolving specialty that has recently benefited from technological and radiopharmaceutical advances. As a result there has been an increase in the accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessing the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Moreover, ECG gated SPECT allows the simultaneous assessment of both myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function, which provides additional prognostic value. With increasing concern over early detection of coronary artery disease and its effective treatment, myocardial perfusion imaging is ideally placed to provide a full “one stop” functional assessment for any patient, irrespective of their exercise capacity. This applies not only to patients with chest pain but also to those with myocardial infarction, revascularisation, and heart failure, and those being assessed for non-cardiac surgery. The focus of this review is the use of myocardial perfusion imaging in risk stratification for coronary artery disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heart.89.11.1291

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 1995, J Nucl Med, 36, 2138
  2. 1999, J Nucl Med, 40, 650
  3. 1997, Am J Cardiol, 79, 10
  4. 2001, Cardiovasc J Southern Africa, 12, 259
  5. 2002, J Am Coll Cardiol, 39, 172A
  6. 1994, J Nucl Med, 35, 554

Cited by

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Sabharwal, N. K., & Lahiri, A.
Affiliations
Northwick Park Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Lahiri, A
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-10-31
Volume
89
Issue
11
Pages
1291-1297
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2115529930
Cited by
72
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
myocardial perfusion imaging, risk stratification, coronary artery disease, gated SPECT, left ventricular function, prognosis, myocardial infarction, heart failure, non-cardiac surgery, chest pain
MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Disease, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi, Risk Assessment, Radiopharmaceuticals, Echocardiography, Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.