Cited by 161Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart rate and cardiovascular healthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Atrial fibrillation associated with ivabradine treatment: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Martin, Ruairidh I R, Pogoryelova, Oksana, Koref, Mauro Santibáñez, Bourke, John P, Teare, M Dawn, Keavney, Bernard D·2014·Heart

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify any risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with ivabradine treatment by meta-analysis of clinical trial data. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched for double-blinded randomised controlled trials of ivabradine with a minimum follow-up period of 4 weeks. For studies where AF data were unpublished, safety data were obtained from the European Medicines Agency (EMeA) website and personal communications. Studies were appraised for risk of bias using components recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analyses were performed of relative risk of AF and absolute risk difference of AF per year of treatment. The main outcome measure was incident AF during the follow-up period. RESULTS: AF data were available from 11 studies: one from the published report, six from the EMeA and four from personal communications. Ivabradine treatment was associated with a relative risk of AF of 1.15 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.24, p=0.0027) among 21 571 patients in the meta-analysis. From this we estimated that the number needed to harm for ivabradine would be 208 (95% CI 122 to 667) per year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AF is a substantially more common side effect of ivabradine treatment than one patient in 10 000, the risk presently reported in the product literature. The incidence of AF has not routinely been reported in clinical trials of ivabradine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305482

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Higgins JPT Green S; Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, R. I. R., Pogoryelova, O., Koref, M. S., Bourke, J. P., Teare, M. D., & Keavney, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Martin, Ruairidh I R
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-06-20
Volume
100
Issue
19
Pages
1506-1510
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2159461724
Cited by
161
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (FS/12/55/29695)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
ivabradine, atrial fibrillation, drug-induced arrhythmia, adverse drug reactions, number needed to harm, atrial fibrillation incidence, drug safety
MeSH terms
Ivabradine, Angina Pectoris, Atrial Fibrillation, Benzazepines, Heart Failure, Humans, Incidence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review