Cited by 114Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsGDF15 and Related BiomarkersHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement

Open access
Lindman, Brian R, Breyley, Jared G, Schilling, Joel D, Vatterott, Anna M, Zajarias, Alan, Maniar, Hersh S, Damiano, Ralph J, Moon, Marc R +9 more·2015·Heart

Abstract

Objective: In heart failure populations without aortic stenosis (AS), the prognostic utility of multiple biomarkers in addition to clinical factors has been demonstrated. We aimed to determine whether multiple biomarkers of cardiovascular stress are associated with mortality in patients with AS undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) independent of clinical factors. Methods: From a prospective registry of patients with AS, 345 participants who were referred for and treated with AVR (transcatheter (n=183) or surgical (n=162)) were included. Eight biomarkers were measured on blood samples obtained prior to AVR: growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), soluble ST2 (sST2), amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), galectin-3, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, myeloperoxidase, high-sensitivity C reactive protein and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Biomarkers were evaluated based on median value (high vs low) in a Cox proportional hazards model for all-cause mortality and a parsimonious group of biomarkers selected. Mean follow-up was 1.9±1.2 years; 91 patients died. Results: Three biomarkers (GDF15, sST2 and NTproBNP) were retained in the model. One-year mortality was 5%, 12%, 18% and 33% for patients with 0 (n=79), 1 (n=96), 2 (n=87) and 3 (n=83) biomarkers elevated, respectively (p<0.001). After adjustment for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score, a greater number of elevated biomarkers was associated with increased mortality (referent: 0 elevated): 1 elevated (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.63, p=0.40), 2 elevated (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.24 to 6.74, p=0.014) and 3 elevated (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.97 to 10.71, p<0.001). Among patients at intermediate or high surgical risk (STS score ≥4), 1-year and 2-year mortality rates were 34% and 43% for patients with three biomarkers elevated versus 4% and 4% for patients with 0 biomarkers elevated. When added to the STS score, the number of biomarkers elevated provided a category-free net reclassification improvement of 64% at 1 year (p<0.001). The association between a greater number of elevated biomarkers and increased mortality after valve replacement was similar in the transcatheter and surgical AVR populations. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential utility of multiple biomarkers to aid in risk stratification of patients with AS. Further studies are needed to evaluate their utility in clinical decision-making in specific AS populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307742

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The added value of these emerging blood biomarkers beyond established clinical, echocardiographic, tomographic and blood biomarkers has not yet been shown.

    “but their incremental value beyond already established clinical, echocardiographic, tomographic and blood biomarkers is yet to be demonstrated.”

    From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [198]

    The Results section ('Added prognostic utility of multiple biomarkers'; page unavailable) demonstrates improved risk reclassification when the biomarkers were added to the STS score or a clinical model, so their incremental value beyond clinical measures had been shown. The paper does not demonstrate incremental value beyond the full combination of clinical, echocardiographic, tomographic and established blood biomarkers claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emerging blood biomarkers such as high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, GDF-15, soluble IL-1 receptor-like 1/ST2 and microRNAs may help detect subclinical or irreversible myocardial dysfunction.

    “Emerging blood biomarkers, such high-sensitivity cardiac troponin194;195, growth/differentiation factor 15, soluble interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 (also called protein ST2) and micro RNAs196–198, might be helpful to detect subclinical and/or irreversible myocardial dysfunction”

    From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [198]

    The Introduction identifies GDF15, soluble ST2 and high-sensitivity troponin as biomarkers of cardiovascular stress, and the Results (Biomarkers and tissue fibrosis and inflammation; page unavailable) link some of them to myocardial fibrosis or inflammation. The paper does not assess microRNAs or establish that these biomarkers detect subclinical or irreversible myocardial dysfunction; its study concerns patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin, and galectin-3 are correlated with all-cause mortality in individuals with CAVS.

    “Previous studies showed that elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin, and galectin-3 are correlated with all-cause mortality in individuals with CAVS.6,7,8,9,10”

    From Aortic valve-specific genes dysregulated in calcific aortic valve stenosis as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results (Individual biomarkers and mortality; page unavailable) identify NTproBNP as having a relationship with mortality. Although the study measured cardiac troponin T and galectin-3, the reported three-biomarker mortality model retained neither; the passages do not establish the claimed mortality association for those two markers. The cohort consisted specifically of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement, not all individuals with CAVS. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindman, B. R., Breyley, J. G., Schilling, J. D., Vatterott, A. M., Zajarias, A., Maniar, H. S., Damiano, R. J., Moon, M. R., Lawton, J. S., Gage, B. F., Sintek, M. A., Aquino, A., Holley, C. L., Patel, N. M., Lawler, C., Lasala, J. M., & Novak, E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Corresponding author
Lindman, Brian R
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-06-02
Volume
101
Issue
17
Pages
1382-1388
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2183048501
Cited by
114
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Edwards Lifesciences
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • AtriCure
  • BG Medicine
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000450, UL1TR000448)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL114889, KO8 HL09837305, K08HL098373, K23HL116660, T32HL007081)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement, prognostic factors, all-cause mortality, growth differentiation factor 15, soluble ST2, NT-proBNP, galectin-3, myeloperoxidase, C-reactive protein, MCP-1, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement, Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score, heart failure, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
MeSH terms
Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Female, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Receptors, Cell Surface, Registries, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Physiological, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Growth Differentiation Factor 15

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review