The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Informing Patients: A Guide for Providing Patient Health Information
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand and address patients' need for information surrounding ambulatory-care visits. DESIGN: The authors conducted two patient focus groups regarding patient education. The first covered general information needs of patients and the second explored their reactions to a computer-generated patient handout that was developed in response to the results of the first focus group and implemented in a clinic. RESULTS: Participants sought information about their health--generally after the encounter with their caregiver. They wanted a permanent record of personal health data and relevant educational information. Participants recommended that the information be concise, clear, and illustrated with graphics if appropriate. Receiving health-related information from their providers favorably affected the participants' trust in, relationship with, and confidence in their physicians. When given printouts with graphic trends depicting their responses to therapy, participants reported that they were more motivated to adhere to a treatment plan and were more satisfied with their care. Based on the results of the focus groups, we developed a set of attributes (P.A.T.I.E.N.T.) to guide the development of patient and consumer health information. CONCLUSIONS: Patients participating in our focus groups felt that providing printed summary information to patients at the end of a clinic visit improves their understanding of their care, enhances their relationships with providers, improves their satisfaction with care, and motivates them to adhere to treatment plans. Further empirical studies are necessary to test their perceptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bernard, A., Langille, M., Hughes, S., Rose, C., Leddin, D., & Veldhuyzen van Zanten, S. (2007) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x · Cited by 1,197
McCray, A. T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1687 · Cited by 371
Early Experiences with Personal Health Records
Halamka, J. D., Mandl, K. D., & Tang, P. C. (2008) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2562 · Cited by 355
Self-citationUsing the Internet to Provide Information Prescriptions
Ritterband, L. M., Borowitz, S., Cox, D. J., Kovatchev, B., Walker, L. S., Lucas, V., & Sutphen, J. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0404 · Cited by 78
From Physician to Consumer: The Effectiveness of Strategies to Manage Health Care Utilization
Flynn, K. E., Smith, M. A., & Davis, M. K. (2002) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/107755802237811 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, P. C., & Newcomb, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-11-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 563-570
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W2159776611
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informing Patients: A Guide for Providing Patient Health Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050563
- The paper
- Tang, P. C., & Newcomb, C. (1998). Informing Patients: A Guide for Providing Patient Health Information. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050563
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.