Cited by 263Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors in the explanation of educational inequalities in mortality in the Netherlands

Open access
van Oort, Floor V A, van Lenthe, Frank J, Mackenbach, Johan P·2005·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Study objectives: To assess the direct and indirect contributions of material, behavioural, and psychosocial factors to the explanation of educational inequalities in mortality simultaneously. Design: Prospective observational study (1991–1998). Setting: General population from south east Netherlands. Participants: 3979 men and women aged 15–74 years without severe chronic disease at baseline (1991). Main results: Material factors (type of health insurance, financial problems, and housing tenure), psychosocial factors (life events and external locus of control), and behavioural factors (smoking habits and physical activity) together reduced the relative risk of mortality of the lowest educated group from 2.57 (95%CI 1.43 to 4.64) to 1.01 (95%CI 0.50 to 2.03). Of these three groups of factors, material factors contributed most to the educational inequalities. Part of the contribution of material factors was via psychosocial factors and part via behavioural factors. Psychosocial factors contributed to educational inequalities, partly via behavioural factors. Behavioural and psychosocial factors contributed only marginally to the explanation independent of material factors. Conclusion: Educational inequalities in mortality were explained by material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors. Material factors contributed most to the explanation, partly via psychosocial and behavioural factors. Improving the material situation of lower educated people may substantially reduce educational inequalities in mortality, partly via the psychosocial and behavioural consequences of improved material circumstances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2003.016493

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Stronks K, Mheen van de H, Mackenbach JP. Achtergronden van sociaal- economische gezondheidsverschillen. Een overzicht van literatuur en een onderzoeksmodel. T Soc Gezondheidsz 1993;71:2-10.
  2. Garretsen HFL. Problem drinking. Determination of prevalence, influencing factors and possibilities for prevention. [In Dutch]. [Thesis]. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger BV, 1983.
  3. Ormel J. Difficulties with living or difficult life. [In Dutch]. [Thesis]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1980.
  4. Hendriks AAJ, Ormel J, van de Willige G. Long lasting difficulties measured with a self-assessment questionnaire and semi structured interview: a theoretical and empirical comparison. [In Dutch]. Gedrag Gezondh 1990;18:273-83.
  5. van Tilburg TG. Received and desired support in the light of experiences with loneliness. [In Dutch]. [Thesis]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1988.
  6. Schreurs P, Tellegen B, Vromans ISY, et al. The development of the Utrecht coping list. [In Dutch]. [Thesis]. Utrecht: Vakgroep Klinische Psychologie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1983.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Oort, F. V. A., van Lenthe, F. J., & Mackenbach, J. P.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-02-11
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
214-220
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2159201362
Cited by
263
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
socioeconomic inequalities in health, material factors, psychosocial factors, behavioral factors, health insurance, financial problems, housing tenure, life events, locus of control, smoking, physical activity, social class
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Netherlands, Poverty, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review