Cited by 63Health disparities and outcomesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Does personality explain social inequalities in mortality? The French GAZEL cohort study

Open access
Nabi, H., Kivimaki, M., Marmot, M. G, Ferrie, J., Zins, M., Ducimetiere, P., Consoli, S. M, Singh-Manoux, A.·2008·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 'indirect-selection' hypothesis proposes that some quality of the individual, a personality characteristic or intelligence, leads to both socioeconomic position (SEP) and health. We aim to quantify the contribution of personality measures to the associations between SEP and mortality. METHODS: Of the GAZEL cohort, 14 445 participants aged 39-54 years in 1993 and followed-up over 12.7 years, completed the Bortner-Type-A-scale, the Buss-Durkee-Hostility-Inventory and the Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck-Personality-Stress-Inventory. Indicators of SEP, such as father's social class, education, occupational grade and income, were assessed at baseline. Relative indices of inequality in Cox regression models were used to estimate associations. RESULTS: In age-adjusted analyses, risk of death was inversely associated with SEP among men and women. Among men, the attenuation in this association depended on the measures of SEP and was 28-29% for 'neurotic-hostility', 13-22% for 'anti-social' and 13-16% for 'CHD-prone' personality. In women, the attenuation was evident only for type-A-behaviour, by 11%. After controlling simultaneously for all personality factors that predicted mortality, associations between SEP and mortality were attenuated in men: by 34% for education, 29% for occupational position and 28% for income; but were only attenuated by 11% for income in women. For cardiovascular mortality, the corresponding percentages of reduction were 42, 31 and 44% after adjustment for 'CHD-prone' personality in men. CONCLUSIONS: Personality measures explained some of the mortality gradients observed for measures of adult socioeconomic position in men, but had little explanatory power in women. Whether personality represents a predictor or an outcome of social circumstances needs further research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyn021

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

4 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pulkki L, Kivimaki M, Keltikangas-Jarvinen L, Elovainio M, Leino M, Viikari J. Contribution of adole- scent and early adult personality to the inverse associa- tion between education and cardiovascular risk behaviours: prospective population-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:968-75.
  2. Grossarth-Maticek R, Kanazir DT. Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer and stroke: the Yugoslav prospec- tive study. J Psychosom 1983;39:94-105.
  3. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association ß The Author 2008; all rights reserved. Advance Access publication 3 April 2008 International Journal of Epidemiology 2008;37:602-603 doi:10.1093/ije/dyn062 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nabi, H., Kivimaki, M., Marmot, M. G., Ferrie, J., Zins, M., Ducimetiere, P., Consoli, S. M., & Singh-Manoux, A.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
Corresponding author
Nabi, H.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-02-14
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
591-602
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2115538016
Cited by
63
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/07/008/23674)
  • European Science Foundation
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Academy of Finland (117604)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
personality, social inequalities in mortality, socioeconomic position, Type A behavior pattern, hostility, neuroticism, antisocial personality, cardiovascular mortality, sex differences, GAZEL cohort, occupational class, income
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Educational Status, Female, France, Health Status, Humans, Income, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Personality, Risk, Sex Factors, Social Mobility, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review