The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To measure the prevalence of limited functional health literacy in the UK, and examine associations with health behaviours and self-rated health. Design: Psychometric testing using a British version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) in a population sample of adults. Setting: UK-wide interview survey (excluding Northern Ireland and the Scottish Isles). Participants: 759 adults (439 women, 320 men) aged 18–90 years (mean age _ 47.6 years) selected using random location sampling. Main outcome measures: Functional health literacy, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, physical exercise and smoking. Results: We found that 11.4% of participants had either marginal or inadequate health literacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the risk of having limitations in health literacy increased with age (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06), being male (odds ratio _ 2.04; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.55), low educational attainment (odds ratio _ 7.46; 95% confidence interval 3.35 to 16.58) and low income (odds ratio _ 5.94; 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 18.89). In a second multivariable logistic regression analysis, every point higher on the health literacy scale increased the likelihood of eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.003 to 1.03), being a non-smoker (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.0003 to 1.03) and having good self-rated health (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.04), independently of age, education, gender, ethnicity and income. Conclusions: The results encourage efforts to monitor health literacy in the British population and examine associations with engagement with preventative health behaviours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Gottfredson, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174 · Cited by 580
Cited by
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 · Cited by 5,505
Bostock, S., & Steptoe, A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1602 · Cited by 601
Self-citationThe Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review
Mantwill, S., Monestel-Umaña, S., & Schulz, P. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145455 · Cited by 395
Hsu, C.-C., Quang-Thanh, N., Chien, F., Li, L., & Mohsin, M. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14499-w · Cited by 369
Aaby, A., Friis, K., Christensen, B., Rowlands, G., & Maindal, H. T. (2017) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487317729538 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, C. V., Knight, K., Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2007-11-13
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1086-1090
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2168881144
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.2006.053967
- The paper
- Wagner, C. V., Knight, K., Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (2007). Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.053967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.