Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social inequality in fetal growth: a comparative study of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden in the period 1981–2000

Mortensen, L H, Diderichsen, F, Arntzen, A, Gissler, M, Cnattingius, S, Schnor, O, Davey-Smith, G, Nybo Andersen, A-M·2008·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Objective: To examine the socioeconomic patterns and time trends in fetal growth in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden from 1981 to 2000. Design and settings: Data on all live-born singleton births was drawn from national population registries in each of the four countries (Denmark n = 1 077 584; Finland n = 400 442; Norway n = 929 458; Sweden n = 1 761 562). Main outcome measure: Slope index of inequality (SII) and mean differences in birthweight for gestational age, SII and risk differences in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants. Results: In all countries, gradients in fetal growth by parental education existed. Low parental education was associated with lower birthweight, increased risk of SGA and decreased risk of LGA. Mother’s education exerted the strongest influence on outcomes, whereas father’s education had a weaker effect. The educational gradients as measured by the SII were generally steepest in Denmark, followed by Norway, Sweden, and Finland. From 1981 to 2000, the educational gradients in birthweight decreased in all countries, except Denmark where it increased. All countries experienced small decreases in the educational gradient in SGA over time. Conclusion: The economic recession in Denmark in the 1980s was concurrent with an increase in disparities in fetal growth, whereas the economic recession in Finland and Sweden in the early 1990s did not substantially increase the socioeconomic inequality in fetal growth. The economic growth in the later part of the 1990s may have diminished the socioeconomic inequality in fetal growth in Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2007.061473

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1093/ije/28.2.276 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520330039034 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/ije/12.3.319 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/jech.57.9.681 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/ije/dyg195 · DOI
  6. Spencer N . Weighing the evidence. How is birthweight determined? Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd,2003.
  7. 10.1093/eurpub/4.2.92 · DOI
  8. 10.1136/bmj.298.6676.795 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/ije/dyh269 · DOI
  10. Nordentoft, 1996, Intrauterine growth retardation and premature delivery: the influence of maternal smoking and psychosocial factors., Am J Public Health, 86, 347, 10.2105/AJPH.86.3.347 · DOI
  11. Ericson, 1993, Secular trends in the effect of socio-economic factors on birth weight and infant survival in Sweden., Scand J Soc Med, 21, 10, 10.1177/140349489302100103 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00665.x · DOI
  13. 10.1136/jech.2005.038380 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Koupilova, 1998, Increasing social variation in birth outcomes in the Czech Republic after 1989., Am J Public Health, 88, 1343, 10.2105/AJPH.88.9.1343 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/ije/29.1.118 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/08035259950169855 · DOI
  17. 10.1136/jech.57.9.687 · DOI
  18. Koupilova, 1998, Social variation in size at birth and preterm delivery in the Czech Republic and Sweden, 1989–91., Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 12, 7, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1998.00075.x · DOI
  19. 10.2307/2095831 · DOI
  20. Hogstedt C Moberg H . (Eds) . Health for all? A critical study of policies in seven European countries. Östersund, Sweden: National Institute of Public Health, 2007; In press.
  21. 10.1093/ije/30.6.1233 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X · DOI
  23. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600534 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00553-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00012 · DOI
  26. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00756.x · DOI
  27. Rose G . The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  28. Lahelma, 2001, Changing health inequalities in the Nordic countries?, Scand J Public Health Suppl, 55, 1, 10.1177/14034948010290011301 · DOI
  29. 10.1136/jech.57.6.433 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1136/adc.83.3.203 · DOI
  31. 10.2105/AJPH.91.2.284 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/080352598750031310 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/1471-2393-6-16 · DOI
  34. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00266.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mortensen, L. H., Diderichsen, F., Arntzen, A., Gissler, M., Cnattingius, S., Schnor, O., Davey-Smith, G., & Nybo Andersen, A.-M.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-03-13
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
325-331
ISSN
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
Cited by
71
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.