Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduced acute hospitalisation with the healthy housing programme

Jackson, Gary, Thornley, Simon, Woolston, Jude, Papa, Dean, Bernacchi, Alan, Moore, Tracey·2011·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of the Healthy Housing Programme in reducing acute hospitalisations in South Auckland, New Zealand. The programme involved house modifications to reduce overcrowding, insulation and ventilation improvements, and health and social service assessments, referrals and linkages. Methods: An intervention evaluation was used. Participants in the programme were considered cases following their house's intervention and counterfactuals/controls prior to the intervention. Rigorous age-censoring was used to construct a case-counterfactual comparison. 9736 residents of 3410 homes were involved in the programme from September 2001 to December 2007. All lived in areas of relative deprivation (NZDep01=decile 10) and almost all self-identified as Pacific ethnic group. The main outcome measure was acute hospitalisation rates before, during and after a health and housing intervention. Hospital data were gathered from July 1999 to January 2009. Results: In the post-intervention group, people aged 5–34 years had a HR of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85) for acute hospitalisations compared to the counterfactual (pre-intervention). For children aged 0–4 years the HR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99); a non-significant increase occurred in adults aged 35 years plus. When the causes of hospitalisation were restricted to those related to housing, further falls in the HRs were seen: 0.88 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.05) for 0–4 year olds and 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.91) for 5–34 year olds. Conclusion: A package of care that addresses housing conditions that impact on health and improves access to health and social services is associated with a reduced acute hospitalisation rate for 0–34 year olds.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2009.107441

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Breysse, 2004, The relationship between housing and health: children at risk, Environ Health Perspect, 112, 1583, 10.1289/ehp.7157 · DOI
  2. Baker, 2000, Household crowding: a major risk factor for epidemic meningococcal disease in Auckland children, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 19, 983, 10.1097/00006454-200010000-00009 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/bmj.39070.573032.80 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.038 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00565.x · DOI
  6. Therneau TM Grambsch PM . Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer, 2000. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.187 · DOI
  8. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.143909 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, G., Thornley, S., Woolston, J., Papa, D., Bernacchi, A., & Moore, T.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-01-30
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
588-593
ISSN
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
Cited by
43
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review