Cited by 33Clinical practice guidelines implementationUrban and Rural Development ChallengesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Setting Housing Standards to Improve Global Health

Open access
Howden-Chapman, Philippa, Roebbel, Nathalie, Chisholm, Elinor·2017·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Developing World Health Organization international guidelines is a highly formal process. Yet the resulting guidelines, which Member States are encouraged, but not required to adopt, are a powerful way of developing rigorous policy and fostering implementation. Using the example of the housing and health guidelines, which are currently being finalised, this paper outlines the process for developing WHO guidelines. This includes: forming a Guidelines Review Group that represents all regions of the world, and ensures gender balance and technical expertise; identifying key health outcomes of interest; commissioning systematic reviews of the evidence; assessing the evidence; and formulating recommendations. The strength of each recommendation is assessed based on the quality of the evidence, along with consideration of issues such as equity, acceptability, and feasibility of the implementation of the recommendation. The proposed housing guidelines will address: cold and hot indoor temperatures, home injuries, household crowding, accessibility and access to active travel infrastructure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph14121542

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite evidence on aspects of frameworks, the overall effectiveness of guidelines, building codes, and national regulations in improving health and well-being is not clearly established and remains an important research area.

    “Despite evidence on aspects of frameworks, the overall effectiveness of guidelines (69), building codes, and national regulations in improving health and well-being is not clearly established and remains an important research area (170).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]World Health Organization Indoor Air Quality Guidelines: Household Fuel Combustion WHO Geneva, Switzerland 2014 25577935
  2. [9]Baker M.G. McDonald A. Zhang J. Howden-Chapman P. Infectious Diseases Attributable to Household Crowding in New Zealand: A Systematic Review and Burden of Disease Estimate He Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Programme, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand 2013
  3. [17]Gove W.R. Hughes M. Galle O.R. Overcrowding in the Household: An Analysis of Determinants and Effects Academic Press New York, NY, USA 1983
  4. [27]Shannon H. Allen C. Dávila D. Gupta S. Keck K. Lang S. Wood L. Allen Tushabe D. Report of the Systematic Review on Household Crowding for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  5. [30]Telfar Barnard L. Report of the Systematic Review on Indoor Cold for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  6. [31]Telfar Barnard L. Report of the Systematic Review on Insulation against Cold for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  7. [38]Head K. Addendum to the Report of the Systematic Review on Indoor Heat for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  8. [39]Head K. Bailey M. Livinski A. Singh A. Report of the Systematic Review on Indoor Heat for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  9. [41]Peden M. World Report on Child Injury Prevention World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2008 26269872
  10. [46]Bhaumik S. Allen C. Gupta S. Report of the Systematic Review on Housing Safety and Injuries for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  11. [53]MacLachlan M. Young Cho H. Clarke M. Mannan H. Kayabu B. McAuliffe E. Report of the Systematic Review on Accessible Home Environments for People with Functional Impairments for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015
  12. [72]Head K. Santos J. Waller S. Love R. Nevitte A. Report of the Systematic Review on Access to Walking and Cycling Infrastructure for Active Travel for the WHO Housing and Health Guidelines World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howden-Chapman, P., Roebbel, N., & Chisholm, E.
Affiliations
  • He Kainga Oranga, Housing and Health Programme, University of Otago, Wellington 6242, New Zealand
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-12-09
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
1542
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771669125
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Otago
  • Sheffield Hallam University
  • Kindai University
  • Kanazawa University
  • University of Warwick
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Massey University
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Queen's University
  • Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé
  • Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos
  • Medical Research Council
  • Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
WHO guidelines, housing and health, guideline development, systematic reviews, evidence evaluation, strength of recommendation, indoor temperature, home injuries, household crowding, active travel infrastructure, global health policy
MeSH terms
Housing, Humans, Global Health, World Health Organization, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review