Cited by 22Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Attention and Memory Impairments in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Comparison to Healthy Controls

Piasecki, Bartosz, Stanisławska-Kubiak, Maia, Strzelecki, Wojciech, Mojs, Ewa·2017·Journal of Investigative Medicine

Abstract

The main aim of the study was to analyze and compare attention and memory performance in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and in healthy controls. 28 patients with CF, 30 patients with IBD and 30 healthy subjects took part in the study (all in age range of 7-17). All subjects were in intellectual norm. To analyze the functioning of attention, the d2 Test of Attention by Brickenkamp (d2 test) was applied. Memory performance was assessed using the Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT) and the Trial of 10 words. The CF and IBD groups committed significantly more errors in the d2 test than the healthy controls. The CF group also had significantly higher fluctuation rates and received significantly lower scores in overall concentration performance than the control group. Patients with CF made more mistakes and had fewer correct memory projections in BVRT than the healthy controls. Patients with IBD committed significantly more errors in BVRT than the control group. Patients with CF and IBD also got significantly lower scores in the Trial of 10 words than the control group. Pediatric patients with CF and IBD performed more poorly than the healthy controls on attention and memory tests. More distinct cognitive impairments were observed in the CF group. Further research is needed to find the underlying mechanisms and clinical and/or functional significance of observed cognitive deficits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jim-2017-000486

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piasecki, B., Stanisławska-Kubiak, M., Strzelecki, W., & Mojs, E.
Affiliations
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL)
  • Department of Clinical Psychology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Corresponding author
Piasecki, Bartosz
Venue
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Published
2017-10
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
1062-1067
ISSN
  • 1081-5589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8267
OpenAlex
W2736492719
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, attention deficits, memory impairment, cognitive impairment, pediatric patients, D2 attention test, visual retention, concentration performance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review