Cited by 4Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural changes from wild-type define tumor-rejecting neoantigens

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Challenges in predicting which neoantigens mediate tumor rejection limit the efficacy of neoantigen vaccines to treat cancers, especially for cancers with a high mutational burden like cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Only a small portion of neoantigens prioritized by current methods elicit effective T cell responses, demonstrating the critical need for improved criteria for the prediction of tumor-rejecting neoantigens. Methods: Publicly available human cSCC datasets were used to assess the frequency of shared mutations between patients. A transplantable ultraviolet light-induced mouse model of cSCC was generated. The mutational signature and driver mutations in the mouse model were compared with human tumors. Neoantigens were prioritized in the mouse model, and tumor-rejecting neoantigens were identified through (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) and in vivo prophylactic vaccination. Binding of the neoantigens and corresponding wild-type peptides to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I was determined. Structural modeling of peptide:MHC complexes was performed to assess for changes in structural characteristics of the neoantigens relative to the wild-type peptides. Results: A minority of human cSCC tumors shared neoantigens. The mouse cSCC model recapitulated the mutational signature and driver mutations found in human disease and was constrained by CD8 T cells. Two MHC class I neoantigens were identified in the mouse model that constrained cSCC growth. One tumor-rejecting neoantigen exhibited improved MHC binding, and the other had increased solvent accessibility of the mutated residue, compared with wild-type. Across known neoantigens that do not impact MHC binding, increased exposure of the mutated residue distinguished tumor-rejecting from non-immunogenic neoantigens. Conclusions: Given the paucity of shared mutations, this work supports the need for personalized neoantigen vaccines in cSCC. To facilitate further discovery, we provide a clinically relevant mouse cSCC model with two defined neoantigens that mediate tumor rejection. Structural changes in the exposure of features that promote T cell receptor recognition defined tumor-rejecting neoantigens. Incorporation of structural modeling to predict changes in T cell receptor accessibility is anticipated to improve the selection of neoantigens for inclusion in personalized cancer vaccines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jitc-2025-013148

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1126/science.aaa4971 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Rojas, 2023, Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer, Nature New Biol, 618, 144, 10.1038/s41586-023-06063-y · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sahin, 2017, Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer, Nature New Biol, 547, 222, 10.1038/nature23003 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ott, 2017, An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma, Nature New Biol, 547, 217, 10.1038/nature22991 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41577-023-00937-y · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.aaa3828 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gubin, 2014, Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens, Nature New Biol, 515, 577, 10.1038/nature13988 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3722 · DOI
  9. 10.1084/jem.20141308 · DOI
  10. Dolina, 2023, Linked CD4+/CD8+ T cell neoantigen vaccination overcomes immune checkpoint blockade resistance and enables tumor regression, J Clin Invest, 133, 10.1172/JCI164258 · DOI
  11. 10.4049/jimmunol.2100700 · DOI
  12. Ebrahimi-Nik, 2019, Mass spectrometry driven exploration reveals nuances of neoepitope-driven tumor rejection, JCI Insight, 5, 10.1172/jci.insight.129152 · DOI
  13. Chang, 2021, The landscape of driver mutations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, NPJ Genom Med, 6, 10.1038/s41525-021-00226-4 · DOI
  14. Adams, 2021, Solar Simulated Light Induces Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Inbred Mice: A Clinically Relevant Model to Investigate T-Cell Responses, J Invest Dermatol, 141, 2990, 10.1016/j.jid.2021.06.005 · DOI
  15. Anderson, 1993, Intracellular transport of class I MHC molecules in antigen processing mutant cell lines, J Immunol, 151, 3407, 10.4049/jimmunol.151.7.3407 · DOI
  16. Nassir, 2025, Multiomic Sequencing of Intermediate- to High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Identifies Critical Genes and Expression Patterns Associated with Disease and Poor Outcomes, J Invest Dermatol, 145, 2060, 10.1016/j.jid.2025.01.015 · DOI
  17. Nassir S , Li X , Severson KJ , et al . Multi-omic sequencing of intermediate to high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma identifies critical genes and expression patterns associated with disease and poor outcomes. Gene Expression Omnibus; 2024. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE284467; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1202062
  18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr612 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nbt.3344 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.humimm.2007.04.005 · DOI
  21. Ji AL , Rubin AJ . Single cell and spatial analysis of human squamous cell carcinoma (WES). Gene Expression Omnibus; 2023. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE144237
  22. Chitsazzadeh, 2016, Cross-species identification of genomic drivers of squamous cell carcinoma development across preneoplastic intermediates, Nat Commun, 7, 10.1038/ncomms12601 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/nmeth.4197 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Brennick, 2021, An unbiased approach to defining bona fide cancer neoepitopes that elicit immune-mediated cancer rejection, J Clin Invest, 131, 10.1172/JCI142823 · DOI
  26. Łuksza, 2022, Neoantigen quality predicts immunoediting in survivors of pancreatic cancer, Nature New Biol, 606, 389, 10.1038/s41586-022-04735-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.str.2023.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkab314 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lawrence, 2014, Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types, Nature New Biol, 505, 495, 10.1038/nature12912 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hoyos, 2022, Fundamental immune-oncogenicity trade-offs define driver mutation fitness, Nature New Biol, 606, 172, 10.1038/s41586-022-04696-z · DOI
  31. Jorgenson, 2020, Genetic ancestry, skin pigmentation, and the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic white populations, Commun Biol, 3, 10.1038/s42003-020-01461-8 · DOI
  32. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0351 · DOI
  33. 10.4049/jimmunol.1700893 · DOI
  34. Ebrahimi-Nik, 2021, Reversion analysis reveals the in vivo immunogenicity of a poorly MHC I-binding cancer neoepitope, Nat Commun, 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-26646-5 · DOI
  35. Schmidt, 2021, Prediction of neo-epitope immunogenicity reveals TCR recognition determinants and provides insight into immunoediting, Cell Rep Med, 2, 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100194 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1500973112 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Calis, 2013, Properties of MHC class I presented peptides that enhance immunogenicity, PLoS Comput Biol, 9, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003266 · DOI
  38. Custodio, 2023, Structural and physical features that distinguish tumor-controlling from inactive cancer neoepitopes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 120, 10.1073/pnas.2312057120 · DOI
  39. Zhang, 2023, Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis, Skin Res Technol, 29, 10.1111/srt.13229 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.059 · DOI
  41. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1072 · DOI
  42. Li, 2021, Neoantigen vaccination induces clinical and immunologic responses in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations, J Immunother Cancer, 9, 10.1136/jitc-2021-002531 · DOI
  43. 10.1172/JCI82416 · DOI
  44. 10.1126/science.aaf2288 · DOI
  45. Capietto, 2020, Mutation position is an important determinant for predicting cancer neoantigens, J Exp Med, 217, 10.1084/jem.20190179 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41589-020-0610-1 · DOI
  47. Gupta, 2023, HLA3DB: comprehensive annotation of peptide/HLA complexes enables blind structure prediction of T cell epitopes, Nat Commun, 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-42163-z · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Adams, A. C., Macy, A. M., Borden, E. S., Herrmann, L. M., Brambley, C. A., Sonar, S. A., Ma, T., Li, X., Hughes, A., Roe, D. J., Mangold, A. R., Nikolich, J. Z., Buetow, K. H., Wilson, M. A., Baker, B. M., & Hastings, K. T.
Affiliations
  • Phoenix VA Health Care System (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
  • Department of Immunobiology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hastings, Karen Taraszka
Venue
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2025-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
e013148
ISSN
2051-1426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415451524
Cited by
4
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX005336)
  • National Cancer Institute (F30CA257622, F30CA281056, P01CA229112, P30CA023074, T32CA009213)
  • American Skin Association (N/A)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118166)
  • University of Arizona (N/A)
  • Dermatology Foundation (N/A)
  • Mayo Clinic (N/A)
  • Arnold and Kit Palmer (N/A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, neoantigen vaccines, personalized cancer vaccines, MHC class I binding, T cell receptor recognition, mutational signatures, driver mutations, CD8+ T cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review