The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural changes from wild-type define tumor-rejecting neoantigens
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Challenges in predicting which neoantigens mediate tumor rejection limit the efficacy of neoantigen vaccines to treat cancers, especially for cancers with a high mutational burden like cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Only a small portion of neoantigens prioritized by current methods elicit effective T cell responses, demonstrating the critical need for improved criteria for the prediction of tumor-rejecting neoantigens. Methods: Publicly available human cSCC datasets were used to assess the frequency of shared mutations between patients. A transplantable ultraviolet light-induced mouse model of cSCC was generated. The mutational signature and driver mutations in the mouse model were compared with human tumors. Neoantigens were prioritized in the mouse model, and tumor-rejecting neoantigens were identified through (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) and in vivo prophylactic vaccination. Binding of the neoantigens and corresponding wild-type peptides to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I was determined. Structural modeling of peptide:MHC complexes was performed to assess for changes in structural characteristics of the neoantigens relative to the wild-type peptides. Results: A minority of human cSCC tumors shared neoantigens. The mouse cSCC model recapitulated the mutational signature and driver mutations found in human disease and was constrained by CD8 T cells. Two MHC class I neoantigens were identified in the mouse model that constrained cSCC growth. One tumor-rejecting neoantigen exhibited improved MHC binding, and the other had increased solvent accessibility of the mutated residue, compared with wild-type. Across known neoantigens that do not impact MHC binding, increased exposure of the mutated residue distinguished tumor-rejecting from non-immunogenic neoantigens. Conclusions: Given the paucity of shared mutations, this work supports the need for personalized neoantigen vaccines in cSCC. To facilitate further discovery, we provide a clinically relevant mouse cSCC model with two defined neoantigens that mediate tumor rejection. Structural changes in the exposure of features that promote T cell receptor recognition defined tumor-rejecting neoantigens. Incorporation of structural modeling to predict changes in T cell receptor accessibility is anticipated to improve the selection of neoantigens for inclusion in personalized cancer vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Crystal Structure of a p53 Tumor Suppressor-DNA Complex: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., & Pavletich, N. P. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8023157 · Cited by 2,559
Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing
Yadav, M., Jhunjhunwala, S., Phung, Q. T., Lupardus, P., Tanguay, J., Bumbaca, S., Franci, C., Cheung, T. K., Fritsche, J., Weinschenk, T., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14001 · Cited by 1,186
Multimodal Analysis of Composition and Spatial Architecture in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Ji, A. L., Rubin, A. J., Thrane, K., Jiang, S., Reynolds, D. L., Meyers, R. M., Guo, M. G., George, B. M., Mollbrink, A., Bergenstråhle, J., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.039 · Cited by 1,117
Weber, J. S., Carlino, M. S., Khattak, A., Meniawy, T., Ansstas, G., Taylor, M. H., Kim, K. B., McKean, M., Long, G. V., Sullivan, R. J., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02268-7 · Cited by 916
de Bruijn, I., Kundra, R., Mastrogiacomo, B., Tran, T. N., Sikina, L., Mazor, T., Li, X., Ochoa, A., Zhao, G., Lai, B., et al. (2023) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0816 · Cited by 886
Self-citationMHC-II neoantigens shape tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy
Alspach, E., Lussier, D. M., Miceli, A. P., Kizhvatov, I., DuPage, M., Luoma, A. M., Meng, W., Lichti, C. F., Esaulova, E., Vomund, A. N., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1671-8 · Cited by 846
Wells, D. K., van Buuren, M. M., Dang, K. K., Hubbard-Lucey, V. M., Sheehan, K. C. F., Campbell, K. M., Lamb, A., Ward, J. P., Sidney, J., Blazquez, A. B., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.015 · Cited by 538
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1126/science.aaa4971 · DOI · Paper page
- Rojas, 2023, Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer, Nature New Biol, 618, 144, 10.1038/s41586-023-06063-y · DOI · Paper page
- Sahin, 2017, Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer, Nature New Biol, 547, 222, 10.1038/nature23003 · DOI · Paper page
- Ott, 2017, An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma, Nature New Biol, 547, 217, 10.1038/nature22991 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41577-023-00937-y · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa3828 · DOI · Paper page
- Gubin, 2014, Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens, Nature New Biol, 515, 577, 10.1038/nature13988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3722 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20141308 · DOI
- Dolina, 2023, Linked CD4+/CD8+ T cell neoantigen vaccination overcomes immune checkpoint blockade resistance and enables tumor regression, J Clin Invest, 133, 10.1172/JCI164258 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.2100700 · DOI
- Ebrahimi-Nik, 2019, Mass spectrometry driven exploration reveals nuances of neoepitope-driven tumor rejection, JCI Insight, 5, 10.1172/jci.insight.129152 · DOI
- Chang, 2021, The landscape of driver mutations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, NPJ Genom Med, 6, 10.1038/s41525-021-00226-4 · DOI
- Adams, 2021, Solar Simulated Light Induces Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Inbred Mice: A Clinically Relevant Model to Investigate T-Cell Responses, J Invest Dermatol, 141, 2990, 10.1016/j.jid.2021.06.005 · DOI
- Anderson, 1993, Intracellular transport of class I MHC molecules in antigen processing mutant cell lines, J Immunol, 151, 3407, 10.4049/jimmunol.151.7.3407 · DOI
- Nassir, 2025, Multiomic Sequencing of Intermediate- to High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Identifies Critical Genes and Expression Patterns Associated with Disease and Poor Outcomes, J Invest Dermatol, 145, 2060, 10.1016/j.jid.2025.01.015 · DOI
- Nassir S , Li X , Severson KJ , et al . Multi-omic sequencing of intermediate to high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma identifies critical genes and expression patterns associated with disease and poor outcomes. Gene Expression Omnibus; 2024. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE284467; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1202062
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr612 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3344 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.humimm.2007.04.005 · DOI
- Ji AL , Rubin AJ . Single cell and spatial analysis of human squamous cell carcinoma (WES). Gene Expression Omnibus; 2023. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE144237
- Chitsazzadeh, 2016, Cross-species identification of genomic drivers of squamous cell carcinoma development across preneoplastic intermediates, Nat Commun, 7, 10.1038/ncomms12601 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.4197 · DOI · Paper page
- Brennick, 2021, An unbiased approach to defining bona fide cancer neoepitopes that elicit immune-mediated cancer rejection, J Clin Invest, 131, 10.1172/JCI142823 · DOI
- Łuksza, 2022, Neoantigen quality predicts immunoediting in survivors of pancreatic cancer, Nature New Biol, 606, 389, 10.1038/s41586-022-04735-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2023.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab314 · DOI · Paper page
- Lawrence, 2014, Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types, Nature New Biol, 505, 495, 10.1038/nature12912 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoyos, 2022, Fundamental immune-oncogenicity trade-offs define driver mutation fitness, Nature New Biol, 606, 172, 10.1038/s41586-022-04696-z · DOI
- Jorgenson, 2020, Genetic ancestry, skin pigmentation, and the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic white populations, Commun Biol, 3, 10.1038/s42003-020-01461-8 · DOI
- 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0351 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1700893 · DOI
- Ebrahimi-Nik, 2021, Reversion analysis reveals the in vivo immunogenicity of a poorly MHC I-binding cancer neoepitope, Nat Commun, 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-26646-5 · DOI
- Schmidt, 2021, Prediction of neo-epitope immunogenicity reveals TCR recognition determinants and provides insight into immunoediting, Cell Rep Med, 2, 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100194 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1500973112 · DOI · Paper page
- Calis, 2013, Properties of MHC class I presented peptides that enhance immunogenicity, PLoS Comput Biol, 9, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003266 · DOI
- Custodio, 2023, Structural and physical features that distinguish tumor-controlling from inactive cancer neoepitopes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 120, 10.1073/pnas.2312057120 · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis, Skin Res Technol, 29, 10.1111/srt.13229 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.059 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1072 · DOI
- Li, 2021, Neoantigen vaccination induces clinical and immunologic responses in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations, J Immunother Cancer, 9, 10.1136/jitc-2021-002531 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI82416 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaf2288 · DOI
- Capietto, 2020, Mutation position is an important determinant for predicting cancer neoantigens, J Exp Med, 217, 10.1084/jem.20190179 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-020-0610-1 · DOI
- Gupta, 2023, HLA3DB: comprehensive annotation of peptide/HLA complexes enables blind structure prediction of T cell epitopes, Nat Commun, 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-42163-z · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, A. C., Macy, A. M., Borden, E. S., Herrmann, L. M., Brambley, C. A., Sonar, S. A., Ma, T., Li, X., Hughes, A., Roe, D. J., Mangold, A. R., Nikolich, J. Z., Buetow, K. H., Wilson, M. A., Baker, B. M., & Hastings, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Phoenix VA Health Care System (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Department of Immunobiology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hastings, Karen Taraszka
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e013148
- ISSN
- 2051-1426 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12548620
- OpenAlex
- W4415451524
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX005336)
- National Cancer Institute (F30CA257622, F30CA281056, P01CA229112, P30CA023074, T32CA009213)
- American Skin Association (N/A)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118166)
- University of Arizona (N/A)
- Dermatology Foundation (N/A)
- Mayo Clinic (N/A)
- Arnold and Kit Palmer (N/A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, neoantigen vaccines, personalized cancer vaccines, MHC class I binding, T cell receptor recognition, mutational signatures, driver mutations, CD8+ T cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review