Cited by 181Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

The safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: 10 years and beyond

Open access
Baizabal-Carvallo, J. F., Kagnoff, M. N., Jimenez-Shahed, J., Fekete, R., Jankovic, J.·2014·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven to be a safe and effective therapy for refractory essential tremor, but information regarding long-term outcomes is lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of DBS in patients with essential tremor. METHODS: Patients treated with DBS for essential tremor for at least 8 years were evaluated in the 'on' and 'off' state using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale, and their medical records were reviewed to assess complications related to this therapy. RESULTS: We studied 13 patients (7 men): median age at evaluation 79 years (range 47-88), median age at electrode implantation 68 years (range 37-78) and mean time since electrode implantation 132.54±15.3 months (range 114-164). The difference between the 'off' and 'on' state on the motor items of the tremor rating scale was 41.9% (58.62 vs. 34.08, p<0.001) in the non-blinded and 37.2% (56.07 vs. 35.23, p<0.001) in the blinded rating. DBS provided a functional improvement of 31.7% in the 'on' state (15.07 vs. 22.07, p<0.001). A total non-blinded improvement in the tremor rating scale of 39% was observed in the 'on' state (49.15 vs. 80.69, p<0.001). Dysarthria and disequilibrium were common in patients with bilateral stimulation. A DBS-related surgery (electrode revision or internal pulse generator exchange) was necessary on average every 47.9 months to continue with the DBS therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Thalamic DBS is a safe and effective therapy in patients with essential tremor followed for up to 13 years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Essential tremor is usually intermittent and occurs mainly during voluntary movement or while holding a posture.

    “Tremor in ET is typically intermittent, predominantly occurring during voluntary movement and/or while maintaining a certain posture[2].”

    From Closed-loop DBS triggered by real-time movement and tremor decoding based on thalamic LFPs for essential tremor (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Results and Table 2 report postural and action tremor in patients with essential tremor, consistent with tremor occurring while holding a posture or moving. The paper does not describe tremor as typically intermittent, and its measurements in a small DBS-treated group do not establish that these are the predominant circumstances for essential tremor generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior closed-loop deep brain stimulation studies have used wearable inertial sensors, surface electromyography, or electrocorticography from a cortical strip to provide feedback for stimulator control.

    “Some existing studies have used wearable inertial sensors [7], surface electromyography (EMG) [8], or electrocorticography (ECoG) recorded from a Neurosciences strip of intracranial electrodes implanted over the surface of the motor cortex [9] to provide feedback for the control of the stimulator in closed-loop DBS systems.”

    From Closed-loop DBS triggered by real-time movement and tremor decoding based on thalamic LFPs for essential tremor (2020) · cites this paper as [9]

    The citation [9] is attached to the ECoG example. The Patients and Methods section describes thalamic DBS with constant-voltage stimulation and clinician-adjusted settings, but our copy does not describe cortical-strip ECoG recordings used as feedback for closed-loop control. Searches for ECoG, cortical recording, feedback, and adaptive stimulation found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All these existing closed-loop deep brain stimulation solutions require external sensors or additional invasive recording, which limits their clinical use in essential tremor.

    “However, all these solutions require external sensors and/or additional invasive recording, which constrains their clinical application in the treatment of ET.”

    From Closed-loop DBS triggered by real-time movement and tremor decoding based on thalamic LFPs for essential tremor (2020) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Patients and Methods section describes constant-voltage DBS with parameters adjusted after implantation, while the Results and Discussion address long-term outcomes and complications. Searches for closed-loop stimulation, external sensors, and additional invasive recording found no passage addressing whether such requirements constrain clinical use in essential tremor. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]23. Baizabal-Carvallo JF, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:567-572. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943 Movement disorders copyright. on February 19, 2024 by guest. Protected by http://jnnp.bmj.com/ J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943 on 4 October 2013. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baizabal-Carvallo, J. F., Kagnoff, M. N., Jimenez-Shahed, J., Fekete, R., & Jankovic, J.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Jankovic, J.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-10-04
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
567-572
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100314836
Cited by
181
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
thalamic stimulation, essential tremor, long-term outcomes, safety, efficacy, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale, dysarthria, disequilibrium, bilateral stimulation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dysarthria, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thalamus, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Essential Tremor, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review