Cited by 98Migraine and Headache StudiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Brief intervention for medication-overuse headache in primary care. The BIMOH study: a double-blind pragmatic cluster randomised parallel controlled trial

Open access
Kristoffersen, Espen Saxhaug, Straand, Jørund, Vetvik, Kjersti Grøtta, Benth, Jūratė Šaltytė, Russell, Michael Bjørn, Lundqvist, Christofer·2015·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is common in the general population. We investigated effectiveness of brief intervention (BI) for achieving drug withdrawal in primary care patients with MOH. METHODS: The study was double-blind, pragmatic and cluster-randomised controlled. A total of 25,486 patients (age 18-50) from 50 general practitioners (GPs) were screened for MOH. GPs defined clusters and were randomised to receive BI training (23 GPs) or to continue business as usual (BAU; 27 GPs). The Severity of Dependence Scale was applied as a part of the BI. BI involved feedback about individual risk of MOH and how to reduce overuse. Primary outcome measures were reduction in medication and headache days/month 3 months after the intervention and were assessed by a blinded clinical investigator. RESULTS: 42% responded to the postal screening questionnaire, and 2.4% screened positive for MOH. A random selection of up to three patients with MOH from each GP were invited (104 patients), 75 patients were randomised and 60 patients included into the study. BI was significantly better than BAU for the primary outcomes (p<0.001). Headache and medication days were reduced by 7.3 and 7.9 (95% CI 3.2 to 11.3 and 3.2 to 12.5) days/month in the BI compared with the BAU group. Chronic headache resolved in 50% of the BI and 6% of the BAU group. CONCLUSIONS: The BI method provides GPs with a simple and effective instrument that reduces medication-overuse and headache frequency in patients with MOH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01314768.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308548

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A model of brief intervention, in which clinicians give involved feedback on behaviour and how to reduce pain-generating behaviour, is successful in reducing chronic pain from medication overuse headaches.

    “New research suggests that a model of brief intervention, in which clinicians give involved feedback on behaviour and how to reduce pain-generating behaviour, is successful in reducing chronic pain from medication overuse headaches [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Erratum Cephalalgia 2006; 26: 360.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kristoffersen, E. S., Straand, J., Vetvik, K. G., Benth, J. Š., Russell, M. B., & Lundqvist, C.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Kristoffersen, Espen Saxhaug
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-08-11
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
505-512
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2148786262
Cited by
98
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universitetet i Oslo
  • Akershus Universitetssykehus
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
medication overuse headache, brief intervention, drug withdrawal, general practitioners, primary care, chronic headache, headache frequency, medication overuse, physician training, Severity of Dependence Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analgesics, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Psychotherapy, Brief, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Headache Disorders, Secondary, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review