The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motor cortex hyperexcitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies demonstrate that motor cortex excitability is increased in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and that intracortical inhibitory phenomena are impaired. The aim of the present study was to determine whether hyperexcitability is due to the impairment of intracortical inhibitory circuits or to an independent abnormality of excitatory circuits. METHODS: We assessed the excitability of the motor cortex with TMS in 28 patients with AD using several TMS paradigms and compared the data of cortical excitability (evaluated by measuring resting motor threshold) with the amount of motor cortex disinhibition as evaluated using the test for motor cortex cholinergic inhibition (short latency afferent inhibition) and GABAergic inhibition (short latency intracortical inhibition). The data in AD patients were also compared with that from 12 age matched healthy individuals. RESULTS: The mean resting motor threshold was significantly lower in AD patients than in controls. The amount of short latency afferent inhibition was significantly smaller in AD patients than in normal controls. There was also a tendency for AD patients to have less pronounced short latency intracortical inhibition than controls, but this difference was not significant. There was no correlation between resting motor threshold and measures of either short latency afferent or intracortical inhibition (r = -0.19 and 0.18 respectively, NS). In 14 AD patients the electrophysiological study was repeated after a single oral dose of the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine. Resting motor threshold was not significantly modified by the administration of rivastigmine. In contrast, short latency afferent inhibition from the median nerve was significantly increased by the administration of rivastigmine. CONCLUSIONS: The change in threshold did not seem to correlate with dysfunction of inhibitory intracortical cholinergic and GABAergic circuits, nor with the central cholinergic activity. We propose that the hyperexcitability of the motor cortex is caused by an abnormality of intracortical excitatory circuits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: A review of progress
Francis, P. T., Palmer, A. M., Snape, M., & Wilcock, G. K. (1999) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.2.137 · Cited by 2,198 · cited 1×
“7 However, the hypothesis of a disinhibition of the motor cortex in AD should also be taken into consideration because several recent studies have demonstrated an abnormality of two inhibitory mechanisms accessible to TMS in patients with AD.”
BackgroundMoghaddam, B., Adams, B., Verma, A., & Daly, D. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-08-02921.1997 · Cited by 1,793
Bartus, R. T. (2000) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1006/exnr.2000.7397 · Cited by 829
Cited by
At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s disease.
Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Devanand, D. P., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514 · Cited by 589
Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
Cirillo, G., Di Pino, G., Capone, F., Ranieri, F., Florio, L., Todisco, V., Tedeschi, G., Funke, K., & Di Lazzaro, V. (2017) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.009 · Cited by 446
Self-citationDi Lazzaro, V., Pilato, F., Dileone, M., Profice, P., Ranieri, F., Ricci, V., Bria, P., Tonali, P. A., & Ziemann, U. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.005 · Cited by 240
BABILONI, C., FRISONI, G., PIEVANI, M., VECCHIO, F., LIZIO, R., BUTTIGLIONE, M., GEROLDI, C., FRACASSI, C., EUSEBI, F., & FERRI, R. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.005 · Cited by 171
Tremblay, S., de Beaumont, L., Lassonde, M., & Théoret, H. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1615 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Lazzaro, V
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 555-559
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150319801
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor cortex hyperexcitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.2003.018127
- The paper
- Di Lazzaro, V. (2004). Motor cortex hyperexcitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.018127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.