The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term effects of the concomitant use of memantine with cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Patients using cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have a delay in nursing home (NH) admission compared with those who were not using the medication. There are no long-term studies of the effects of memantine in combination with ChEIs use in Alzheimer disease (AD). This study was conducted to examine the effects of ChEIs and memantine on time to death and time to NH admission. METHODS: Time to NH admission and death was examined in 943 probable AD patients who had at least a 1-year follow-up evaluation. Of these patients, 140 (14.9%) used both ChEIs and memantine, 387 (41%) [corrected] used only ChEIs, and 416 (44.1%) [corrected] used neither. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 62.3 (35.8) months. The analysis was conducted with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models controlling for critical covariates (ie, age, education level, gender, severity of the dementia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, psychiatric symptoms and use of psychotropic medications). RESULTS: Compared with those who never used cognitive enhancers, patients who used ChEIs had a significant delay in NH admission (HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.49); this effect was significantly augmented with the addition of memantine (HR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.72) (memantine+ChEI vs ChEI alone). ChEIs alone, or in combination with memantine had no significant association on time to death. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study revealed that the addition of the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine to the treatment of AD with ChEI significantly altered the treated history of AD by extending time to nursing home admission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Short-term (6-12 months) RCTs (level I evidence), longer-term (12-36 months) openlabel extensions of RCTs (level II or III evidence), and long-term (2 to 5-plus years) observational prospective clinical cohort effectiveness studies (level II evidence) support the safety and benefits of anti-AD treatments in combination, most frequently as memantine added on to a stable regimen of background ChEI”
From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
In the citing paper
“Longer-term prospective observational clinical patient cohort studies report reduced clinical decline in patients with AD treated at any stage.[114][115][116][117][118][119]”
From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [117]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
VALIDITY OF THE TRAIL MAKING TEST AS AN INDICATOR OF ORGANIC BRAIN DAMAGE
Reitan, R. M. (1958) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271 · Cited by 8,167
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [32]APA Diagnostic and statistical manual on mental disorders—Revised (DSM-III-R) 1987 3rd edn. Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ballard, C., Gauthier, S., Corbett, A., Brayne, C., Aarsland, D., & Jones, E. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61349-9 · Cited by 2,336
Alzheimer Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
Huang, Y., & Mucke, L. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.040 · Cited by 1,758
Therapeutics of Alzheimer's disease: Past, present and future
Anand, R., Gill, K. D., & Mahdi, A. A. (2013) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.004 · Cited by 765
The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum
Atri, A. (2019) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2018.10.009 · Cited by 623
The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer's disease
Sims, R., Hill, M., & Williams, J. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0599-5 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez, O. L., Becker, J. T., Wahed, A. S., Saxton, J., Sweet, R. A., Wolk, D. A., Klunk, W., & DeKosky, S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-02-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 600-607
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2823571
- OpenAlex
- W2171545307
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p01ag003705-04)
- National Institute on Aging (AG 05-133, AG 20098, AG027224, P50AG005133, U01AG016976, AG 03705, R01AG020098, AG-16976, R56AG020098, R01AG027224)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, memantine, cholinesterase inhibitors, combination therapy, nursing home admission, time to death, NMDA receptor antagonists, long-term effects
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Memantine, Mental Status Schedule, Neuropsychological Tests, Nursing Homes, Patient Admission, Survival Analysis, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Nootropic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review