Cited by 13Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Neurolinguistic analysis of the language abilities of a patient with a "double disconnection syndrome": a case of subangular alexia in the presence of mixed transcortical aphasia.

Open access
Pirozzolo, F J, Kerr, K L, Obrzut, J E, Morley, G K, Haxby, J V, Lundgren, S·1981·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

In contrast to the classic form of alexia without agraphia, subangular alexia results from a single lesion located deep in the white matter of the left parietal lobe. In the present report, a patient with subangular alexia and features of mixed transcortical aphasia is described. Neurolinguistic findings include: alexia without agraphia, paucity of spontaneous speech, moderate auditory comprehension difficulty, excellent repetition, echopraxia, colour agnosia, and naming disorder. Neurolinguistic tests revealed intact phonological organisation and grammatical filter." Our studies revealed a "double disconnection syndrome," the co-existence of two relatively rare neurobehavioural disorders. Furthermore, the studies reported here clearly show dissociations of language functions in both the visual and auditory modality, which demonstrates that the stages of language processing are separable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.44.2.152

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Output projections from the VWFA to lateral language areas may be interrupted in parietal white matter, providing a plausible account for subangular alexia.

    “Conversely, output projections from the VWFA to lateral language areas may be interrupted during their course in the parietal white matter, providing a plausible account for the so-called subangular alexia (Greenblatt, 1976; Iragui and Kritchevsky, 1991; Pirozzolo et al., 1981).”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Pirozzolo et al., 1981

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pirozzolo, F. J., Kerr, K. L., Obrzut, J. E., Morley, G. K., Haxby, J. V., & Lundgren, S.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1981-02-01
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
152-155
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969358302
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
alexia without agraphia, naming disorders, echopraxia, auditory comprehension, neurolinguistic assessment
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Dyslexia, Acquired, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Psycholinguistics, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review