Cited by 47Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHospital Admissions and OutcomesHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The impact of sleep deprivation in military surgical teams: a systematic review

Open access
Parker, Rachael SV, Parker, P·2017·Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps

Abstract

Background Fatigue in military operations leads to safety and operational problems due to a decrease in alertness and performance. The primary method of counteracting the effects of sleep deprivation is to increase nightly sleep time, which in operational situations is not always feasible. History has taught us that surgeons and surgical teams are finite resources that cannot operate on patients indefinitely. Methods A systematic review was conducted using the search terms ‘sleep’ and ‘deprivation’ examining the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in military surgical teams. Studies examining outcomes on intensive care patients and subjects with comorbidities were not addressed in this review. Results Sleep deprivation in any ‘out-of-hours’ surgery has a significant impact on overall morbidity and mortality. Sleep deprivation in surgeons and surgical trainees negatively impacts cognitive performance and puts their own and patients' health at risk. All published research lacks consensus when defining ‘sleep deprivation’ and ‘rested’ states. It is recognised that it would be unethical to conduct a well-designed randomised controlled trial, to determine the effects of fatigue on performance in surgery; however, there is a paucity between surrogate markers and applying simulated results to actual clinical performance. This requires further research. Recommended methods of combating fatigue include: prophylactically ‘sleep-banking’ prior to known periods of sleep deprivation, napping, use of stimulant or alerting substances such as modafinil, coordinated work schedules to reduce circadian desynchronisation and regular breaks with enforced rest periods. Conclusions A forward surgical team will become combat-ineffective after 48 hours of continuous operations. This systematic review recommends implementing on-call periods of no more than 12 hours in duration, with adequate rest periods every 24 hours. Drug therapies and sleep banking may, in the short term, prevent negative effects of acute sleep deprivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jramc-2016-000640

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Albergo JI, Fernández M, Zaifrani L, et al. How does sleep deprivation during 24 hours on call duty affect the cognitive performance of orthopaedic residents? Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2016;60:113-18. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, R. S., & Parker, P.
Affiliations
  • Royal Preston Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Parker, P
Venue
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-09-13
Volume
163
Issue
3
Pages
158-163
ISSN
  • 0035-8665 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-0468
OpenAlex
W2519877104
Cited by
47
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
sleep deprivation, military surgery, surgical team, fatigue, cognitive performance, out-of-hours surgery, napping, modafinil, rest periods, surgical residents
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Benzhydryl Compounds, Clinical Competence, Cognition, Fatigue, Health Personnel, Humans, Military Medicine, Military Personnel, Patient Care Team, Rest, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Task Performance and Analysis, Wakefulness-Promoting Agents, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review