Cited by 869Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disorders

Sleep deprivation: Impact on cognitive performance

Open access
Alhola, Paula, Polo-Kantola, Päivi·2007·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

Today, prolonged wakefulness is a widespread phenomenon. Nevertheless, in the field of sleep and wakefulness, several unanswered questions remain. Prolonged wakefulness can be due to acute total sleep deprivation (SD) or to chronic partial sleep restriction. Although the latter is more common in everyday life, the effects of total SD have been examined more thoroughly. Both total and partial SD induce adverse changes in cognitive performance. First and foremost, total SD impairs attention and working memory, but it also affects other functions, such as long-term memory and decision-making. Partial SD is found to influence attention, especially vigilance. Studies on its effects on more demanding cognitive functions are lacking. Coping with SD depends on several factors, especially aging and gender. Also interindividual differences in responses are substantial. In addition to coping with SD, recovering from it also deserves attention. Cognitive recovery processes, although insufficiently studied, seem to be more demanding in partial sleep restriction than in total SD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.a930

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Well-controlled sleep deprivation studies have shown that lack of sleep increases fatigue and sleepiness and worsens cognitive performance.

    “Well-controlled sleep deprivation studies have shown that lack of sleep not only increases fatigue and sleepiness but also worsens cognitive performance.2,3,16,17”

    From Sleep quality, duration, and consistency are associated with better academic performance in college students (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The ‘Chronic partial sleep restriction’ section says that well-controlled studies found greater cognitive impairment with less sleep. The review also discusses tiredness and sleepiness, but its narrative does not establish that those well-controlled studies demonstrated increases in both fatigue and sleepiness; that part of the claim is not fully supported by our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sleep deprivation negatively affects attention, working memory, and learning.

    “Sleep deprivation also negatively affects attention, working memory, and learning (Alhola and Polo-Kantola, 2007; Krause et al., 2017; Walker and Stickgold, 2006).”
  • Lack of sleep has been linked to poor attention and cognition.

    “Beyond the effects of sleep on memory consolidation, lack of sleep has been linked to poor attention and cognition.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Armitage R, Smith C, Thompson S, et al. 2001. Sex differences in slow- wave activity in response to sleep deprivation. Sleep Research Online, 4(1):33-41.
  2. Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. 1974. Working memory. Academic Press. p. 47-89.
  3. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. 2005. Normal human sleep: An overview. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. p. 13-23.
  4. Manber R, Armitage R. 1999. Sex, steroids, and sleep: A review. Sleep, 22:540-55.
  5. Samkoff JS, Jacques CH. 1991. A review of studies concerning effects of sleep deprivation and fatigue on residents' performance. Acad Med, 66:687-93.
  6. Shneerson JM. 2000. Handbook of sleep medicine. Cambridge: Blackwell Science.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alhola, P., & Polo-Kantola, P.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2007-11
Volume
Volume 3
Issue
5
Pages
553-567
ISSN
  • 1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2021
OpenAlex
W1925423442
Cited by
869
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep deprivation, total sleep deprivation, cognitive performance, attention, working memory, sustained attention, long-term memory, decision-making, aging, gender differences, individual differences, cognitive recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review