Cited by 4093D Printing in Biomedical ResearchPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The hope and the hype of organoid research

Open access
Huch, Meritxell, Knoblich, Juergen A., Lutolf, Matthias P., Martinez-Arias, Alfonso·2017·Development

Abstract

The recent increase in organoid research has been met with great enthusiasm, as well as expectation, from the scientific community and the public alike. There is no doubt that this technology opens up a world of possibilities for scientific discovery in developmental biology as well as in translational research, but whether organoids can truly live up to this challenge is, for some, still an open question. In this Spotlight article, Meritxell Huch and Juergen Knoblich begin by discussing the exciting promise of organoid technology and give concrete examples of how this promise is starting to be realised. In the second part, Matthias Lutolf and Alfonso Martinez-Arias offer a careful and considered view of the state of the organoid field and its current limitations, and lay out the approach they feel is necessary to maximise the potential of organoid technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.150201

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lot-to-lot variations of Matrigel compound the difficulty of identifying the signals necessary for organoid structure and function.

    “The undefined nature of Matrigel makes it difficult to identify the signals necessary for organoid structure and function; this difficulty is compounded by lot-to-lot variations of Matrigel45–48.”

    From Towards organoid culture without Matrigel (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huch, M., Knoblich, J. A., Lutolf, M. P., & Martinez-Arias, A.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (AT)
Venue
Development
Published
2017-03-14
Volume
144
Issue
6
Pages
938-941
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2597311576
Cited by
409
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Royal Society (104151/Z/14/Z)
  • Horizon 2020 (LSFM4LIFE)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences
  • Austrian Science Fund (I_1281-B19, Z_153_B09)
  • European Research Council
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • Novartis Foundation
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Isaac Newton Trust
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
organoids, organoid technology, translational research, developmental biology, research limitations
MeSH terms
Humans, Organoids, Tissue Engineering, Growth and Development, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review