CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standing-based office work shows encouraging signs of attenuating post-prandial glycaemic excursion

Open access
Buckley, John P, Mellor, Duane D, Morris, Michael, Joseph, Franklin·2014·Occupational and Environmental Medicine
DOI 10.1136/oemed-2013-101823
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to compare two days of continuous monitored capillary blood glucose (CGM) responses to sitting and standing in normally desk-based workers. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This open repeated-measures study took place in a real office environment, during normal working hours and subsequent CGM overnight measures in 10 participants aged 21-61 years (8 female). MAIN OUTCOMES: Postprandial (lunch) measures of: CGM, accelerometer movement counts (MC) heart rate, energy expenditure (EE) and overnight CGM following one afternoon of normal sitting work compared with one afternoon of the same work performed at a standing desk. RESULTS: Area-under-the-curve analysis revealed an attenuated blood glucose excursion by 43% (p=0.022) following 185 min of standing (143, 95% CI 5.09 to 281.46 mmol/L min) compared to sitting work (326; 95% CI 228 to 425 mmol/L min). Compared to sitting, EE during an afternoon of standing work was 174 kcals greater (0.83 kcals/min; p=0.028). The accelerometer MC showed no differences between the afternoons of seated versus standing work; reported differences were thus a function of the standing work and not from additional physical movements around the office. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known 'office-based' study to provide CGM measures that add some of the needed mechanistic information to the existing evidence-base on why avoiding sedentary behaviour at work could lead to a reduced risk of cardiometabolic diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oemed-2013-101823

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Buckley, J. P., Mellor, D. D., Morris, M., & Joseph, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Chester (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Buckley, John P
ORCID
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-12-02
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
109-111
ISSN
  • 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
DOI
10.1136/oemed-2013-101823
OpenAlex
W2168710749
Cited by
124
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Chester
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
standing work, sitting work, blood glucose, energy expenditure, sedentary behavior, office workers, continuous glucose monitoring, cardiometabolic risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Workplace, Area Under Curve, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review