The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes
Open accessAbstract
Systematic reviews provide the best evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions including quality improvement strategies. The methods of systematic review of individual patient randomised trials of healthcare interventions are well developed. We discuss methodological and practice issues that need to be considered when undertaking systematic reviews of quality improvement strategies including developing a review protocol, identifying and screening evidence sources, quality assessment and data abstraction, analytical methods, reporting systematic reviews, and appraising systematic reviews. This paper builds on our experiences within the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) review group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
Self-citationEffectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Self-citationSystematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470693926 · Cited by 1,693
Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated
Thompson, S. G. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1351 · Cited by 1,017 · cited 1×
“When faced with heterogeneity in both quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews, it is important to explore the potential causes of this in a narrative and statistical manner (where appropriate).”
BackgroundIssues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials
Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1301 · Cited by 734
Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies
Eccles, M. (2003) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.1.47 · Cited by 586
Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation
Grilli, R., Ramsay, C., & Minozzi, S. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000389 · Cited by 533
The Science of Reviewing Researcha
OXMAN, A. D., & GUYATT, G. H. (1993) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26342.x · Cited by 472
Investigating and Dealing with Publication and Other Biases
Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch11 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
Clement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., Morgan, C., Rüsch, N., Brown, J. S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000129 · Cited by 3,152
Forsetlund, L., Bjørndal, A., Rashidian, A., Jamtvedt, G., O'Brien, M. A., Wolf, F. M., Davis, D., Odgaard-Jensen, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub2 · Cited by 1,849
Self-citationSalanti, G. (2012) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1037 · Cited by 1,729
Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
O'Brien, M. A., Rogers, S., Jamtvedt, G., Oxman, A. D., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Kristoffersen, D. T., Forsetlund, L., Bainbridge, D., Freemantle, N., Davis, D., et al. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000409.pub2 · Cited by 1,279
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimshaw, J.
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 298-303
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- OpenAlex
- W2121827770
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
