The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in (1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and (2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience. METHODS: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: (1) identifying theoretical constructs; (2) simplifying into construct domains; (3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; (4) interdisciplinary evaluation; (5) validating the domain list; and (6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory" group (n = 18), a "health services research" group (n = 13), and a "health psychology" group (n = 30). RESULTS: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: (1) knowledge, (2) skills, (3) social/professional role and identity, (4) beliefs about capabilities, (5) beliefs about consequences, (6) motivation and goals, (7) memory, attention and decision processes, (8) environmental context and resources, (9) social influences, (10) emotion regulation, (11) behavioural regulation, and (12) nature of the behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whilst this framework of 12 theoretical domains has proved useful in assessing and intervening with implementation problems [9], the domain of behaviour has remained under-theorised and therefore underused in its application.”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The group identified 33 theories and 128 key theoretical constructs related to behaviour change and synthesised them into a single framework”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It has been increasingly acknowledged that consideration of patient acceptability using theories of behaviour change are key to effective evaluation, design and implementation of healthcare interventions [23–25] .”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The TDF is an integrated theoretical framework synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs from 33 theories judged most relevant to implementation questions.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A synthesis of 33 theories of behaviour and behaviour change clustered into 14 (originally 12) domains [15,16];”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“'Nature of the behaviour' was identified as one of 12 theoretical domains of influence on implementation-relevant behaviours [9].”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Further, there are intervention development frameworks (e.g. the Behaviour Change Wheel Guide [72], Intervention Mapping [60] and the Theoretical Domains Framework [64, 65]), which offer guidance as to which BCTs to select for targeting mechanisms of action.”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“an integrative framework of theories of behaviour change was developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists [13].”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This resulted in 12 theoretical domains and exemplar questions for each to use in interviews or focus groups”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Following thematic analysis, themes and constituent codes were mapped to the TDF [24] by KR, EH and KA. Mapping was undertaken by determining the ‘fit’ of themes and codes with domains using domain descriptions as working definitions [25].Once mapping was complete, data were checked a final time by KR and then validated by JG to confirm fit with the framework; any discrepancies during the mapping”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interviews followed a semi-structured schedule, taking into consideration elements of the TDF [24], and TFA [23]. Once drafted, interview schedules were reviewed by the EQUITy Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP).”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The TDF facilitated in mapping the study findings into coherent areas to target for change providing a theoretically robust premise for later-stage implementation studies [24, 25].”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In an effort to make theories more accessible to those working in implementation, a team of behavioural scientists developed the TDF in collaboration with implementation researchers [15].”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was initially developed for implementation research to identify influences on health professional behaviour related to implementation of evidence-based recommendations and has been cited in over 800 peer-review publications (Web of Knowledge accessed April 2017).”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Whilst the domains cover the physical and social environment, the majority relate to individual motivation and capability factors.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory; it does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory; it does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Useful guidance from the UK Medical Research Council for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates drawing on theory in intervention design but does not specify how to select and apply theory [9].”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Poor theoretical underpinning makes it difficult to understand and explain how and why implementation succeeds or fails, thus restraining opportunities to identify factors that predict the likelihood of implementation success and develop better strategies to achieve more successful implementation.”
From Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“This discipline-specific approach in the targeted innovations, settings, and end-users, has resulted in multiple and potentially disparate frameworks being developed and used [4,6-12].”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Implementation and knowledge translation frameworks have predominantly developed within disciplines.”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“In the ensuing 9 years, the field has expanded considerably and further taxonomies, checklists, conceptual frameworks, theories, and models of implementation have been developed [10,13,14,17,18].”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“we propose that the concept of the individual might incorporate: capability, capacity, motivation (including recognising a need for change), resilience, acceptability, feelings, knowledge and beliefs (including self efficacy) about the intervention/evidence, position and fit within the organization/social system, and approach to decision-making (e.g., experimentation, use of information).”
From The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“The TDF specifies 14 theoretical domains, each of which includes several theoretical constructs that are similar in definition, but derive from different theories, and which may be relevant to understanding and changing behaviour.”
In the citing paper
“and suggest that Michie et al.’s (2005) 12-domain original version might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as Michie et al.’s (2005)
In the citing paper
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) [31] was developed as an integrative framework of theories of behavior change to overcome these challenges.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“The framework includes 12 theoretical domains of potential behavioral determinants and provides exemplar questions for the theoretical assessment of implementation problems.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Since its original development, the consensus study that produced the TDF [31] has been validated, leading to Cane et al.’s [37] refined TDF.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“the refinement of the domain Motivation and goals of the original TDF [31] into the domains Goals and Intentions in the recent version of the TDF and the classification of multiple goal-related constructs to the domains Goals, Intentions, and Behavioral regulation imply overlap between these domains”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“the domain Reinforcement is a refinement of the Beliefs about consequences domain and was originally included within the latter domain in the original TDF [31]”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“a valid TDF-based questionnaire will increase the use of theory in the assessment of barriers and facilitators for implementation problems [31,69,70], which can inform the selection of possible techniques that can be used to change healthcare professionals’ behaviors [15,23,26]”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“The results partly support Cane et al.’s validation of the TDF [37] and suggest that the 12-domain version [31] might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Michie et al. [20] applied a systematic consensus approach to develop a framework grounded in psychological theory that simplifies theories relevant to behaviour change. The consensus identified 12 theoretical domains from 33 theories and 128 constructs that may explain health-related behaviour change.”
In the citing paper
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) can be used to inform the choice of potential behaviour change techniques to develop interventions as well as to investigate determinants of behaviour [20].”
In the citing paper
“They reflect calls for the use of theories to generate testable hypotheses linking tailored strategies with factors that promote or inhibit implementation, and various attempts to identify theories or constructs within theories best suited for successful implementation [15].”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“All of these factors play a central role in behavior change associated with effective mental health treatments [87,88,89]”
From eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“Practice change theories [19–22] and reviews of clinical practice change interventions suggest that interventions that address multiple barriers to care provision may be more likely to be effective [23, 24].”
From Increasing the provision of preventive care by community healthcare services: a stepped wedge implementation trial (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087
Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior
Becker, M. H. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,065
A guide to constructs of control.
Skinner, E. A. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549 · Cited by 1,931
Oxman, A. D., Thomson, M., Davis, D. A., & Haynes, R. B. (1995) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,847
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,709
Advances in Motivation and Achievement
(2014) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320140000018017 · Cited by 1,545
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4]4. Grimshaw J, Thomas R, Maclennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:6:1-84.
- [8]8. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997;315:418-21.
- [12]12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,012
Francis, J. J., Tinmouth, A., Stanworth, S. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Johnston, M., Hyde, C., Stockton, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D., & Eccles, M. P. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-70 · Cited by 60
Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory
Łuszczyńska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.003 · Cited by 81
Holden, M. A., Metcalf, B., Lawford, B. J., Hinman, R. S., Boyd, M., Button, K., Collins, N. J., Cottrell, E., Henrotin, Y. E., Larsen, J. B., et al. (2022) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.009 · Cited by 70
Johnston, K., Young, Grimmer, K. A., Antic, & Frith, P. A. (2011) · International Journal of COPD · doi:10.2147/copd.s26581 · Cited by 60
Hrisos, S., Eccles, M., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Kaner, E., Steen, N., & Grimshaw, J. (2008) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-11 · Cited by 60
Zhu, D.-Q., Norman, I. J., & While, A. (2011) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2010.00841.x · Cited by 60
New York City Physicians' Views of Providing Long-Acting Reversible Contraception to Adolescents
Rubin, S. E., Davis, K., & McKee, M. D. (2013) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1450 · Cited by 60
Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care
Gagnon, M., Labarthe, J., Légaré, F., Ouimet, M., Estabrooks, C. A., Roch, G., Ghandour, E. K., & Grimshaw, J. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-72 · Cited by 64
Angelis, G. D., Davies, B., King, J., McEwan, J., Cavallo, S., Loew, L., Wells, G. A., & Brosseau, L. (2016) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/mededu.6288 · Cited by 60
Chang, H. F., Power, E., O’Halloran, R., & Foster, A. M. (2018) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12421 · Cited by 60
Alagöz, E., Saucke, M. C., Balasubramanian, P., Lata, P. F., Liebenstein, T., & Kakumanu, S. (2023) · Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1186/s13223-023-00842-y · Cited by 60
Williams, E. C., Achtmeyer, C. E., Young, J. P., Rittmueller, S. E., Ludman, E. J., Lapham, G. T., Lee, A. K., Chavez, L. J., Berger, D. B., & Bradley, K. A. (2015) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2015.07.011 · Cited by 60
Classifying health‐related behaviours: Exploring similarities and differences amongst behaviours
McEachan, R., Lawton, R., & Conner, M. T. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910709x466487 · Cited by 57
Measurement of a model of implementation for health care: toward a testable theory
Cook, J. M., O’Donnell, C., Dinnen, S., Coyne, J. C., Ruzek, J. I., & Schnurr, P. P. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-59 · Cited by 62
Using simulation to improve root cause analysis of adverse surgical outcomes
Slakey, D. P., Simms, E. R., Rennie, K. V., Garstka, M., & Korndorffer, J. R. (2014) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzu011 · Cited by 59
McParlin, C., Bell, R., Robson, S. C., Muirhead, C. R., & Araújo‐Soares, V. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.015 · Cited by 59
Boland, L., Lawson, M. L., Graham, I. D., Légaré, F., Dorrance, K., Shephard, A., & Stacey, D. (2018) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2018.05.010 · Cited by 58
Soukup, T., Gandamihardja, T., McInerney, S., Green, J. S. A., & Sevdalis, N. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027303 · Cited by 62
Yates, T., Davies, M., Gorely, T., Bull, F., & Khunti, K. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.010 · Cited by 58
Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Implementation Science
Czosnek, L., Rankin, N. M., Zopf, E. M., Richards, J. A., Rosenbaum, S., & Cormie, P. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01228-0 · Cited by 60
Crutzen, S., Baas, G., Abou, J., van den Born-Bondt, T., Hugtenburg, J. G., Bouvy, M. L., Heringa, M., Taxis, K., & Denig, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.01268 · Cited by 62
Strengthening methods for tracking adaptations and modifications to implementation strategies
Haley, A. D., Powell, B. J., Walsh‐Bailey, C., Krancari, M., Gruß, I., Shea, C. M., Bunce, A., Marino, M., Frerichs, L., Lich, K. H., et al. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01326-6 · Cited by 58
Ahmed, N., Barlow, S. H., Reynolds, L., Drey, N., Begum, F., Tuudah, E., & Simpson, A. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03304-0 · Cited by 61
Patey, A. M., Fontaine, G., Francis, J., McCleary, N., Presseau, J., & Grimshaw, J. (2022) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2022.2100887 · Cited by 70
Cahir, C., Dombrowski, S. U., Kelly, C. M., Kennedy, M. J., Bennett, K., & Sharp, L. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2685-x · Cited by 63
Al-Rasheed, M. M., Alhawassi, T. M., Alanazi, A., Aloudah, N. M., Khurshid, F., & Alsultan, M. M. (2018) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s165588 · Cited by 58
Attitudinal predictors of older peoples’ and caregivers’ desire to deprescribe in hospital
Scott, S., Clark, A., Farrow, C., May, H. M., Patel, M., Twigg, M. J., Wright, D. J., & Bhattacharya, D. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1127-x · Cited by 57
Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review
Pinto, R. M., Park, S., Miles, R., & Ong, P. N. (2021) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/2633489520985305 · Cited by 61
Hale, J., Hastings, J., West, R., Lefevre, C. E., Direito, A., Bohlen, L. C., Godinho, C. I. A., Anderson, N., Zink, S., Groarke, H., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16121.1 · Cited by 52
Self-citationBonetti, D. L., Johnston, M., Clarkson, J., Grimshaw, J., Pitts, N. B., Eccles, M., Steen, N., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Glidewell, L., et al. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-25 · Cited by 58
Casey, B., Coote, S. B., Hayes, S., & Gallagher, S. M. (2018) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.013 · Cited by 58
Boiko, O. V., Gulliford, M. C., & Burgess, C. C. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13102 · Cited by 57
A critical review of household recycling barriers in the United Kingdom
Oluwadipe, S., Garelick, H., McCarthy, S., & Purchase, D. (2021) · Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x211060619 · Cited by 56
Chaboyer, W. P., Latimer, S. L., Sugathapala, R. D. U. P., Harbeck, E., Patton, D., Sim, J., Moore, Z. E. H., Deakin, J. L., Carlini, J., Lovegrove, J., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104768 · Cited by 75
Huber, A. C., & Mosler, H. (2012) · International Journal of Environmental Health Research · doi:10.1080/09603123.2012.699032 · Cited by 56
Bunzli, S., Nelson, E. A., Scott, A., French, S., Choong, P., & Dowsey, M. M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018614 · Cited by 56
Advancing the use of organization theory in implementation science
Leeman, J., Baquero, B., Bender, M., Choy-Brown, M., Ko, L. K., Nilsen, P., Wangen, M., & Birken, S. A. (2019) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105832 · Cited by 53
on behalf of the BiB childhood obesity scientific group, McEachan, R., Santorelli, G., Bryant, M., Sahota, P., Farrar, D., Small, N., Akhtar, S., Sargent, J., Barber, S., et al. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2861-z · Cited by 57
Lawrenson, J. G., Graham-Rowe, E., Lorencatto, F., Rice, S. J. C., Bunce, C., Francis, J., Burr, J. M., Aluko, P., Vale, L. D., Pető, T., et al. (2018) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta22290 · Cited by 56
Istanboulian, L., Rose, L., Gorospe, F., Yunusova, Y., & Dale, C. (2020) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.015 · Cited by 55
What Promotes Surgeon Practice Change? A Scoping Review of Innovation Adoption in Surgical Practice
Arroyo, N., Gessert, T. G., Hitchcock, M., Tao, M., Smith, C. D., Greenberg, C., Fernandes‐Taylor, S., & Francis, D. O. (2020) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004355 · Cited by 55
Functional Mechanisms of Health Behavior Change Techniques: A Conceptual Review
Michaelsen, M. M., & Esch, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.725644 · Cited by 59
Geurts, E. M. A., Reijs, R. P., Leenders, H. H. M., Jansen, M. W. J., & Hoebe, C. J. P. A. (2024) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-023-09481-x · Cited by 55
Hewett, D. G., Kahi, C. J., & Rex, D. K. (2010) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2010.0004 · Cited by 55
Kitto, S., Sargeant, J., Reeves, S., & Silver, I. (2011) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9303-6 · Cited by 52
Tistad, M., Palmcrantz, S. M., Wallin, L., Ehrenberg, A., Olsson, C., Tomson, G. B., Holmqvist, L. W., Gifford, W., & Eldh, A. C. (2016) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.35 · Cited by 55
Ross, A. J., Sherriff, A., Kidd, J., Gnich, W., Anderson, J. E., Deas, L., & Macpherson, L. M. D. (2017) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.005 · Cited by 54
McParland, J. L., Williams, L., Gozdzielewska, L., Young, M., Smith, F., MacDonald, J., Langdridge, D., Davis, M., Price, L., & Flowers, P. (2018) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12317 · Cited by 56
Collet, J.-P., Sarmast, H., Kissoon, N., & Mosavianpour, M. (2016) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s107796 · Cited by 54
Govender, R., Wood, C. E., Taylor, S. A., Smith, C. H., Barratt, H., & Gardner, B. (2017) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/s00455-017-9799-x · Cited by 51
McLellan, J., O’Carroll, R. E., Cheyne, H., & Dombrowski, S. U. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0913-3 · Cited by 58
Registered nurses’ approach to pressure injury prevention: A descriptive qualitative study
Li, Z., Marshall, A. P., Lin, F. F., Ding, Y., & Chaboyer, W. P. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15218 · Cited by 82
Bernhardsson, S., Larsson, M. E. H., Eggertsen, R., Olsén, M. F., Johansson, K. M., Nilsén, P., Nordeman, L., van Tulder, M. W., & Öberg, B. E. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-105 · Cited by 57
Improving physician hand hygiene compliance using behavioural theories: a study protocol
Squires, J. E., Suh, K. N., Linklater, S., Bruce, N., Gartke, K., Graham, I. D., Karovitch, A. J., Read, J. L., Roth, V. R., Stockton, K., et al. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-16 · Cited by 54
Adopting health behavior change theory throughout the clinical practice guideline process
Ceccato, N., Ferris, L. E., Manuel, D. G., & Grimshaw, J. (2007) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.138 · Cited by 54
Free, C., McCarthy, O., French, R., Wellings, K., Michie, S., Roberts, I., Devries, K. M., Rathod, S. D., Bailey, J., Syred, J., et al. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20570 · Cited by 55
Self-citationLehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien
Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Mandl, H., & Fischer, F. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19981-8_42 · Cited by 55
Hollis, J., Kocanda, L., Seward, K., Collins, C. E., Tully, B., Hunter, M., Foureur, M. J., Lawrence, W. T., MacDonald‐Wicks, L. K., & Schumacher, T. L. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06893-4 · Cited by 53
Selecting and tailoring implementation interventions: a concept mapping approach
Kwok, E. Y. L., Moodie, S., Cunningham, B. J., & Cardy, J. O. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05270-x · Cited by 58
Warner, L. M., & French, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.032 · Cited by 62
Gray, T. A., Wilson, P. M., Dumville, J. C., & Cullum, N. A. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024859 · Cited by 57
Wilson, P. M., & Kislov, R. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009237055 · Cited by 58
Hofstede, S. N., de Mheen, P. J. M., Vlieland, T. P. M. V., van den Ende, C. H. M., Nelissen, R. G. H. H., & van Bodegom‐Vos, L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147406 · Cited by 51
Biezen, R., Grando, D., Mazza, D., & Brijnath, B. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.066 · Cited by 52
Strifler, L., Barnsley, J. M., Hillmer, M. P., & Straus, S. E. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01128-8 · Cited by 52
Camacho, J., Zanoletti-Mannello, M., Landis‐Lewis, Z., Kane‐Gill, S. L., & Boyce, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18388 · Cited by 52
Low‐value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward?
Hartvigsen, J., Kamper, S. J., & French, S. D. (2022) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.13142 · Cited by 51
Forbes, G., Akter, S., Miller, S., Galadanci, H. S., Qureshi, Z. P., Fawcus, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., Moran, N. F., Singata‐Madliki, M., Dankishiya, F. S., et al. (2023) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01253-0 · Cited by 58
Taylor, N., Sahota, P., Sargent, J., Barber, S., Loach, J., Louch, G., & Wright, J. (2013) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-142 · Cited by 53
Gardiner, P. A., Kent, A. L., Rodriguez, V. E., Wojcieszek, A. M., Ellwood, D. A., Gordon, A., Wilson, P. A., Bond, D. M., CHARLES, A. K., Arbuckle, S. M., et al. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1173-8 · Cited by 51
O’Connell, M. B., Jensen, P. S., Andersen, S. L., Fernbrant, C., Nørholm, V., & Petersen, H. V. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14020 · Cited by 51
Presseau, J., Byrne-Davis, L. M. T., Hotham, S., Lorencatto, F., Potthoff, S., Atkinson, L., Bull, E. R., Dima, A. L., van Dongen, A., French, D., et al. (2021) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1866638 · Cited by 60
Willmott, T. J., & Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10541-1 · Cited by 53
Wiggers, J., McElwaine, K., Freund, M., Campbell, L., Bowman, J., Wye, P., Wolfenden, L., Tremain, D., Barker, D., Slattery, C., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0636-2 · Cited by 37
Wozney, L., McGrath, P. J., Gehring, N. D., Bennett, K., Huguet, A., Hartling, L., Dyson, M. P., Soleimani, A., & Newton, A. S. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.9655 · Cited by 50
Stuart, G., & D’Lima, D. (2021) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2021.1918690 · Cited by 50
Knowing What We're Talking About
Peters, G.-J., & Crutzen, R. (2024) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2022.3638 · Cited by 56
Mental Health Clinicians' Experiences of Implementing Evidence-Based Treatments
Powell, B. J., Hausmann‐Stabile, C., & McMillen, J. C. (2013) · Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work · doi:10.1080/15433714.2012.664062 · Cited by 52
A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU
Sinuff, T., Muscedere, J., Rozmovits, L., Dale, C., & Scales, D. C. (2015) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003978 · Cited by 53
Implementation research in emergency medicine: a systematic scoping review
Tavender, E. J., Bosch, M., Fiander, M., Knott, J. C., Gruen, R. L., & O’Connor, D. A. (2015) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2015-205053 · Cited by 51
Newlands, R. S. N., Duncan, E., Prior, M. E., Elouafkaoui, P., Elders, A., Young, L. C., Clarkson, J., & Ramsay, C. R. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0372-z · Cited by 55
Young, H. M. L., Hudson, N., Clarke, A. L., Dungey, M. R., Feehally, J., Burton, J. O., & Smith, A. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128995 · Cited by 50
Gunn, K. M., Hull, M. J., Jones, M., & Dollman, J. (2018) · Rural and Remote Health · doi:10.22605/rrh4155 · Cited by 53
Peck, V., Valiani, S., Tanuseputro, P., Mulpuru, S., Kyeremanteng, K., Fitzgibbon, E., Forster, A. J., & Kobewka, D. M. (2018) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-018-0379-0 · Cited by 48
Changing Behavior Using Ecological Models
Salmon, J., Hesketh, K. D., Arundell, L., Downing, K. L., & Biddle, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.017 · Cited by 57
Leveraging implementation science to advance antibiotic stewardship practice and research
Livorsi, D. J., Drainoni, M., Reisinger, H. S., Nanda, N., McGregor, J. C., Barlam, T. F., Morris, A. M., & Szymczak, J. E. (2021) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2021.480 · Cited by 50
Barker, F., de Lusignan, S., & Deborah, C. (2016) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9843-3 · Cited by 50
Cardol, C. K., Boslooper‐Meulenbelt, K., van Middendorp, H., Meuleman, Y., Evers, A. W. M., & van Dijk, S. (2022) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-022-02837-0 · Cited by 49
Gleadhill, C., Alderman, K. B., Davidson, S. R. E., Kamper, S. J., Tutty, A., Robson, E. K., da Silva, P. V., Donald, B., Dooley, K., Manvell, J., et al. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08741-5 · Cited by 66
McCluskey, A., & Middleton, S. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-18 · Cited by 49
A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Reducing Overuse by Primary Care Providers
Powell, A. A., Bloomfield, H. E., Burgess, D. J., Wilt, T. J., & Partin, M. R. (2013) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558713496166 · Cited by 49
Schofield, P. E., Shaw, T. J., & Pascoe, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12382 · Cited by 53
Melder, A., Robinson, T., McLoughlin, I. P., Iedema, R. A. M., & Teede, H. J. (2020) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/imj.14876 · Cited by 49
May, C. R., Finch, T. L., & Rapley, T. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781788975995.00013 · Cited by 49
Baker, J. A., Berzins, K. M., Canvin, K., Benson, I., Kellar, I., Wright, J. M., López, R. R., Duxbury, J. A., Kendall, T., & Stewart, D. (2021) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr09050 · Cited by 49
Newlands, R. S. N., Duncan, E., Presseau, J., Treweek, S. P., Lawrie, L., Bower, P., Elliott, J., Francis, J., MacLennan, G., Ogden, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.007 · Cited by 49
Portela, M. C., Lima, S. M. L., Martins, M. S., & Travassos, C. (2016) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/0102-311x00105815 · Cited by 64
Greene, C., & Wilson, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Infection Prevention · doi:10.1177/17571774211066779 · Cited by 48
Hsu, T. C., Whelan, P., Gandrup, J., Armitage, C. J., Cordingley, L., & McBeth, J. (2024) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12766 · Cited by 57
Gilles, I., Burnand, B., & Peytremann‐Bridevaux, I. (2014) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzu006 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Michie, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michie, S
- ORCID
- Michie, S
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- PMC
- PMC1743963
- OpenAlex
- W2116567300
- Semantic Scholar
- bdf39eabaf7691033bd0ad16d7d7fa59c92141a9
- Cited by
- 3,440
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 186 · 2025: 221 · 2024: 317 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 372 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 349 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 202 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 159 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 39.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- British Psychological Society
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- evidence-based practice implementation, behavior change, theoretical constructs, consensus development, implementation research, healthcare professional behaviour, health psychology, social influence, emotion regulation, professional role and identity, knowledge and skills
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Models, Psychological, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
