The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in (1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and (2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience. METHODS: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: (1) identifying theoretical constructs; (2) simplifying into construct domains; (3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; (4) interdisciplinary evaluation; (5) validating the domain list; and (6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory" group (n = 18), a "health services research" group (n = 13), and a "health psychology" group (n = 30). RESULTS: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: (1) knowledge, (2) skills, (3) social/professional role and identity, (4) beliefs about capabilities, (5) beliefs about consequences, (6) motivation and goals, (7) memory, attention and decision processes, (8) environmental context and resources, (9) social influences, (10) emotion regulation, (11) behavioural regulation, and (12) nature of the behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whilst this framework of 12 theoretical domains has proved useful in assessing and intervening with implementation problems [9], the domain of behaviour has remained under-theorised and therefore underused in its application.”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The group identified 33 theories and 128 key theoretical constructs related to behaviour change and synthesised them into a single framework”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It has been increasingly acknowledged that consideration of patient acceptability using theories of behaviour change are key to effective evaluation, design and implementation of healthcare interventions [23–25] .”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The TDF is an integrated theoretical framework synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs from 33 theories judged most relevant to implementation questions.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A synthesis of 33 theories of behaviour and behaviour change clustered into 14 (originally 12) domains [15,16];”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“'Nature of the behaviour' was identified as one of 12 theoretical domains of influence on implementation-relevant behaviours [9].”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“an integrative framework of theories of behaviour change was developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists [13].”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This resulted in 12 theoretical domains and exemplar questions for each to use in interviews or focus groups”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Following thematic analysis, themes and constituent codes were mapped to the TDF [24] by KR, EH and KA. Mapping was undertaken by determining the ‘fit’ of themes and codes with domains using domain descriptions as working definitions [25].Once mapping was complete, data were checked a final time by KR and then validated by JG to confirm fit with the framework; any discrepancies during the mapping”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interviews followed a semi-structured schedule, taking into consideration elements of the TDF [24], and TFA [23]. Once drafted, interview schedules were reviewed by the EQUITy Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP).”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The TDF facilitated in mapping the study findings into coherent areas to target for change providing a theoretically robust premise for later-stage implementation studies [24, 25].”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In an effort to make theories more accessible to those working in implementation, a team of behavioural scientists developed the TDF in collaboration with implementation researchers [15].”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was initially developed for implementation research to identify influences on health professional behaviour related to implementation of evidence-based recommendations and has been cited in over 800 peer-review publications (Web of Knowledge accessed April 2017).”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Whilst the domains cover the physical and social environment, the majority relate to individual motivation and capability factors.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory; it does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory; it does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Useful guidance from the UK Medical Research Council for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates drawing on theory in intervention design but does not specify how to select and apply theory [9].”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Poor theoretical underpinning makes it difficult to understand and explain how and why implementation succeeds or fails, thus restraining opportunities to identify factors that predict the likelihood of implementation success and develop better strategies to achieve more successful implementation.”
From Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“This discipline-specific approach in the targeted innovations, settings, and end-users, has resulted in multiple and potentially disparate frameworks being developed and used [4,6-12].”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Implementation and knowledge translation frameworks have predominantly developed within disciplines.”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“In the ensuing 9 years, the field has expanded considerably and further taxonomies, checklists, conceptual frameworks, theories, and models of implementation have been developed [10,13,14,17,18].”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“we propose that the concept of the individual might incorporate: capability, capacity, motivation (including recognising a need for change), resilience, acceptability, feelings, knowledge and beliefs (including self efficacy) about the intervention/evidence, position and fit within the organization/social system, and approach to decision-making (e.g., experimentation, use of information).”
From The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Further, there are intervention development frameworks (e.g. the Behaviour Change Wheel Guide [72], Intervention Mapping [60] and the Theoretical Domains Framework [64, 65]), which offer guidance as to which BCTs to select for targeting mechanisms of action.”
In the citing paper
“The TDF specifies 14 theoretical domains, each of which includes several theoretical constructs that are similar in definition, but derive from different theories, and which may be relevant to understanding and changing behaviour.”
In the citing paper
“and suggest that Michie et al.’s (2005) 12-domain original version might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as Michie et al.’s (2005)
In the citing paper
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) [31] was developed as an integrative framework of theories of behavior change to overcome these challenges.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“The framework includes 12 theoretical domains of potential behavioral determinants and provides exemplar questions for the theoretical assessment of implementation problems.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Since its original development, the consensus study that produced the TDF [31] has been validated, leading to Cane et al.’s [37] refined TDF.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“the refinement of the domain Motivation and goals of the original TDF [31] into the domains Goals and Intentions in the recent version of the TDF and the classification of multiple goal-related constructs to the domains Goals, Intentions, and Behavioral regulation imply overlap between these domains”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“the domain Reinforcement is a refinement of the Beliefs about consequences domain and was originally included within the latter domain in the original TDF [31]”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“a valid TDF-based questionnaire will increase the use of theory in the assessment of barriers and facilitators for implementation problems [31,69,70], which can inform the selection of possible techniques that can be used to change healthcare professionals’ behaviors [15,23,26]”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“The results partly support Cane et al.’s validation of the TDF [37] and suggest that the 12-domain version [31] might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Michie et al. [20] applied a systematic consensus approach to develop a framework grounded in psychological theory that simplifies theories relevant to behaviour change. The consensus identified 12 theoretical domains from 33 theories and 128 constructs that may explain health-related behaviour change.”
In the citing paper
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) can be used to inform the choice of potential behaviour change techniques to develop interventions as well as to investigate determinants of behaviour [20].”
In the citing paper
“They reflect calls for the use of theories to generate testable hypotheses linking tailored strategies with factors that promote or inhibit implementation, and various attempts to identify theories or constructs within theories best suited for successful implementation [15].”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“All of these factors play a central role in behavior change associated with effective mental health treatments [87,88,89]”
From eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“Practice change theories [19–22] and reviews of clinical practice change interventions suggest that interventions that address multiple barriers to care provision may be more likely to be effective [23, 24].”
From Increasing the provision of preventive care by community healthcare services: a stepped wedge implementation trial (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087
Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior
Becker, M. H. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,065
A guide to constructs of control.
Skinner, E. A. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549 · Cited by 1,918
Oxman, A. D., Thomson, M., Davis, D. A., & Haynes, R. B. (1995) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,847
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,709
Advances in Motivation and Achievement
(2014) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320140000018017 · Cited by 1,545
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4]4. Grimshaw J, Thomas R, Maclennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:6:1-84.
- [8]8. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997;315:418-21.
- [12]12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,012
Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks
Skolarus, T. A., Lehmann, T., Tabak, R. G., Harris, J., Lecy, J., & Sales, A. E. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0628-2 · Cited by 163
How to improve healthcare improvement—an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods
Dixon‐Woods, M. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l5514 · Cited by 197
T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool
Birken, S. A., Rohweder, C. L., Powell, B. J., Shea, C. M., Scott, J. E., Leeman, J., Grewe, M. E., Kirk, M. A., Damschroder, L. J., Aldridge, W. A., et al. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0836-4 · Cited by 199
Brown, C. E. B., Richardson, K. E., Pizzirani, B., Atkins, L., Yücel, M., & Segrave, R. A. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4 · Cited by 258
Framework for Patient Safety Research and Improvement
Pronovost, P. J., Goeschel, C. A., Marsteller, J. A., Sexton, J. B., Pham, J. C., & Berenholtz, S. M. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.729848 · Cited by 192
Strategies for Promoting Organizational and Practice Change by Advancing Implementation Research
Rubenstein, L. V., & Pugh, J. A. (2006) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00364.x · Cited by 189
Holopainen, R., Simpson, P., Piirainen, A., Karppinen, J., Schütze, R., Smith, A., O'Sullivan, P., & Kent, P. (2020) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001809 · Cited by 180
Raine, R., Fitzpatrick, R. M., Barratt, H., Bevan, G., Black, N. A., Boaden, R., Bower, P., Campbell, M., Denis, J., Devers, K. J., et al. (2016) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr04160 · Cited by 197
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., Baumann, A. A., Hamilton, A. M., & Santens, R. L. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 · Cited by 169
Designing and implementing behaviour change interventions to improve population health
Michie, S. (2008) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008014 · Cited by 192
Self-citationIssues affecting nurses' capability to use digital technology at work: An integrative review
Brown, J. A., Pope, N., Bosco, A. M., Mason, J., & Morgan, A. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15321 · Cited by 182
Hagger, M. S., Lonsdale, A. J., Koka, A., Hein, V., Pasi, H., Lintunen, T., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-011-9163-8 · Cited by 181
Islam, R., Tinmouth, A. T., Francis, J., Brehaut, J., Born, J., Stockton-Powdrell, C., Stanworth, S. J., Eccles, M., Cuthbertson, B. H., Hyde, C., et al. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-93 · Cited by 180
Krause, J., van Lieshout, J., Klomp, R., Huntink, E. M., Aakhus, E., Flottorp, S. A., Jäger, C., Steinhaeuser, J., Godycki-Ćwirko, M., Kowalczyk, A., et al. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0102-3 · Cited by 178
The sustainability of healthcare innovations: a concept analysis
Fleiszer, A. R., Semenic, S. E., Ritchie, J. A., Richer, M., & Denis, J. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12633 · Cited by 166
Colquhoun, H., Leeman, J., Michie, S., Lokker, C., Bragge, P., Hempel, S., McKibbon, K. A., Peters, G.-J. Y., Stevens, K. R., Wilson, M. G., et al. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-51 · Cited by 180
Self-citationBehavior change interventions: the potential of ontologies for advancing science and practice
Larsen, K. R. T., Michie, S., Hekler, E. B., Gibson, B., Spruijt‐Metz, D., Ahern, D. K., Cole-Lewis, H. J., Ellis, R. J. B., Hesse, B. W., Moser, R. P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9768-0 · Cited by 179
Self-citationMiddle managers’ role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review
Birken, S. A., Clary, A., Tabriz, A. A., Turner, K. L., Meza, R. D., Zizzi, A. R., Larson, M. F., Walker, J. S., & Charns, M. P. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5 · Cited by 198
Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial
Kaminski, M. F., Anderson, J., Valori, R., Kraszewska, E., Rupiński, M., Pachlewski, J., Wrońska, E., Bretthauer, M., Thomas‐Gibson, S., Kuipers, E. J., et al. (2015) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307503 · Cited by 169
Osteoarthritis: Models for appropriate care across the disease continuum
Allen, K. D., Choong, P., Davis, A. M., Dowsey, M. M., Dziedzic, K., Emery, C. A., Hunter, D. J., Losina, E., Page, A. E., Roos, E. M., et al. (2016) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.003 · Cited by 171
Heslehurst, N., Newham, J., Maniatopoulos, G., Fleetwood, C., Robalino, S., & Rankin, J. (2014) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12160 · Cited by 169
KREINDLER, S. A., DOWD, D. A., DANA STAR, N., & GOTTSCHALK, T. (2012) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.x · Cited by 167
Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative study
Reed, J. E., Howe, C., Doyle, C., & Bell, D. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1076-9 · Cited by 181
Fuller, C., Michie, S., Savage, J., McAteer, J., Besser, S. J., Charlett, A., Hayward, A. C., Cookson, B., Cooper, B. S., Duckworth, G. J., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041617 · Cited by 180
Self-citationAyieko, P., Ntoburi, S., Wagai, J. N., Opondo, C., Opiyo, N., Migiro, S., Wamae, A., Mogoa, W., Were, F., Wasunna, A., et al. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001018 · Cited by 172
Low, L., Fletcher, J., Goodenough, B., Jeon, Y., Etherton‐Beer, C., MacAndrew, M., & Beattie, E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140711 · Cited by 170
Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review of The Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals
Albert, F. A., Crowe, M., Malau‐Aduli, A. E. O., & Malau‐Aduli, B. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17124358 · Cited by 166
Determinants of physical activity maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analyses
Amireault, S., Godin, G., & Vézina‐Im, L. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.701060 · Cited by 178
Kortteisto, T., Kaila, M., Komulainen, J., Mäntyranta, T., & Rissanen, P. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-51 · Cited by 186
Cabral, C., Lucas, P. J., Ingram, J. C., Hay, A. D., & Horwood, J. P. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.027 · Cited by 165
Øvretveit, J. (2009) · Cited by 162
Baranowski, T., Cerin, E., & Baranowski, J. C. (2009) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-6 · Cited by 168
Michie, S., Pilling, S., Garety, P., Whitty, P., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., & Simmons, J. (2007) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-8 · Cited by 161
Self-citationO'Connor, C. A., Dyson, J., Cowdell, F., & Watson, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14078 · Cited by 160
Hull, L., Athanasiou, T., & Russ, S. (2016) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002013 · Cited by 159
Tuti, T., Nzinga, J., Njoroge, M. W., Brown, B. C., Peek, N. B., English, M., Paton, C., & van der Veer, S. N. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0590-z · Cited by 167
Nicholson, S. L., Donaghy, M., Johnston, M., Sniehotta, F. F., van Wijck, F., Johnston, D., Greig, C., McMurdo, M. E. T., & Mead, G. (2014) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.874506 · Cited by 156
French, S. D., McKenzie, J. E., O’Connor, D. A., Grimshaw, J., Mortimer, D., Francis, J., Michie, S., Spike, N., Schattner, P. L., Kent, P. M., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065471 · Cited by 156
Self-citationBoylan, A. R., Locock, L., Thomson, R., & Staniszewska, S. H. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12883 · Cited by 154
Why are we failing to implement effective therapies in cardiovascular disease?
Nieuwlaat, R., Schwalm, J.-D., Khatib, R., & Yusuf, S. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs481 · Cited by 155
Lorencatto, F., Charani, E., Sevdalis, N., Tarrant, C., & Davey, P. G. (2018) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dky222 · Cited by 156
Hall, A. M., Scurrey, S. R. M., Pike, A. E., Albury, C., Richmond, H., Matthews, J. J., Toomey, E. C., Hayden, J. A., & Etchegary, H. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4 · Cited by 152
Sinnott, C., Mercer, S. W., Payne, R., Duerden, M. G., Bradley, C., & Byrne, M. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0322-1 · Cited by 147
Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study
McCluskey, A., Vratsistas‐Curto, A., & Schurr, K. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-323 · Cited by 150
A checklist to assess the quality of survey studies in psychology
Protogerou, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2020) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2020.100031 · Cited by 171
The R2C2 Model in Residency Education: How Does It Foster Coaching and Promote Feedback Use?
Sargeant, J., Lockyer, J. M., Mann, K., Armson, H., Warren, A., Zetkulic, M., Soklaridis, S., Könings, K. D., Ross, K., Silver, I., et al. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002131 · Cited by 148
Foy, R., Ovretveit, J., Shekelle, P. G., Pronovost, P. J., Taylor, S. L., Dy, S., Hempel, S., McDonald, K. M., Rubenstein, L. V., & Wachter, R. M. (2011) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047993 · Cited by 148
Changing Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147
Duncan, E., Francis, J., Johnston, M., Davey, P. G., Maxwell, S. R. J., McKay, G. A., McLay, J. S., Ross, S., Ryan, C. A., Webb, D. J., et al. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-86 · Cited by 147
Glowacki, K., Duncan, M. J., Gainforth, H. L., & Faulkner, G. (2017) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.10.001 · Cited by 163
Weston, D., Hauck, K., & Amlôt, R. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5223-1 · Cited by 146
Bhattacharyya, O., Reeves, S., Garfinkel, S., & Zwarenstein, M. (2006) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-5 · Cited by 144
Williams, N. J., Wolk, C. B., Becker‐Haimes, E. M., & Beidas, R. S. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-0970-7 · Cited by 158
Raising the topic of weight in general practice: perspectives of GPs and primary care nurses
Blackburn, M., Stathi, A., Keogh, E., & Eccleston, C. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008546 · Cited by 143
the Canada PRIme Plus Team, Bussières, A., Patey, A. M., Francis, J., Sales, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-82 · Cited by 147
Dyson, J., Lawton, R., Jackson, C., & Cheater, F. (2011) · Journal of Infection Prevention · doi:10.1177/1757177410384300 · Cited by 142
Schroé, H., Dyck, D. V., Paepe, A. L. D., Poppe, L., Loh, W. W., Verloigne, M., Loeys, T., Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., & Crombez, G. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01001-x · Cited by 149
Finch, T. L., Mair, F. S., O’Donnell, C., Murray, E., & May, C. R. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-69 · Cited by 127
A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: Mapping the field
Mitchell, S. A., Fisher, C. A., Hastings, C. E., Silverman, L. B., & Wallen, G. R. (2010) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2010.07.001 · Cited by 138
Beenstock, J., Sniehotta, F. F., White, M., Bell, R., Milne, E. M., & Araujo-Soares, V. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-36 · Cited by 138
Parent-Directed Approaches to Enrich the Early Language Environments of Children Living in Poverty
Suskind, D. L., & Leffel, K. R. (2013) · Seminars in Speech and Language · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1353443 · Cited by 151
Knowledge translation research: the science of moving research into policy and practice.
Curran, J., Grimshaw, J., Hayden, J., & Campbell, B. (2011) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.20124 · Cited by 130
Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Health Care Setting
Beauchemin, M., Cohn, E. G., & Shelton, R. C. (2019) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/ans.0000000000000263 · Cited by 146
McSherry, L. A., Dombrowski, S. U., Francis, J. J., Murphy, J., Martin, C. M., O’Leary, J. J., Sharp, L., & ATHENS Group (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-73 · Cited by 129
Words matter: increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines
Michie, S. (2005) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014100 · Cited by 133
Self-citationKronish, I. M., Kent, S., Moise, N., Shimbo, D., Safford, M. M., Kynerd, R. E., O'Beirne, R., Sullivan, A., & Muntner, P. (2017) · Journal of the American Society of Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.jash.2017.06.012 · Cited by 145
Posadzki, P., Mastellos, N., Ryan, R. E., Gunn, L. H., Felix, L. M., Pappas, Y., Gagnon, M., Julious, S. A., Xiang, L., Oldenburg, B. F., et al. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009921.pub2 · Cited by 142
Development of a formal system for representing behaviour-change theories
West, R., Godinho, C. I. A., Bohlen, L. C., Carey, R., Hastings, J., Lefevre, C. E., & Michie, S. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0561-2 · Cited by 132
Self-citationImplementation of safety checklists in surgery: a realist synthesis of evidence
Gillespie, B. M., & Marshall, A. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0319-9 · Cited by 130
“Theory has not commonly been used in the field of safety research to inform implementation [75, 76].”
BackgroundSrigley, J. A., Corace, K., Hargadon, D. P., Yu, D., MacDonald, T. K., Fabrigar, L. R., & Garber, G. E. (2015) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.019 · Cited by 132
Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., & Collier-Meek, M. A. (2019) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.008 · Cited by 129
Nathan, N., Yoong, S. L., Sutherland, R., Reilly, K., Delaney, T., Janssen, L., Robertson, K., Reynolds, R., Chai, L. K., Lecathelinais, C., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0431-5 · Cited by 127
Howlett, N., Schulz, J., Trivedi, D. P., Troop, N. A., & Chater, A. (2017) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105317739098 · Cited by 149
Foster, N. E., Dziedzic, K., van der Windt, D., Fritz, J. M., & Hay, E. M. (2009) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-3 · Cited by 127
Ojo, S. O., Bailey, D. P., Brierley, M. L., Hewson, D. J., & Chater, A. M. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7468-8 · Cited by 117
Steinmo, S., Fuller, C., Stone, S. P., & Michie, S. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0300-7 · Cited by 119
Self-citationElouafkaoui, P., Young, L. C., Newlands, R. S. N., Duncan, E., Elders, A., Clarkson, J., & Ramsay, C. R. (2016) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 · Cited by 125
Bernstein, A., Rogers, K. M., Possin, K. L., Steele, N. Z. R., Ritchie, C. S., Kramer, J. H., Geschwind, M., Higgins, J. J., Wohlgemuth, J., Pesano, R., et al. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4603-2 · Cited by 120
Johnston, K., Young, M., Grimmer, K. A., Antic, R., & Frith, P. A. (2013) · Primary Care Respiratory Journal · doi:10.4104/pcrj.2013.00062 · Cited by 124
Edwards, R., Charani, E., Sevdalis, N., Alexandrou, B., Sibley, E., Mullett, D., Loveday, H. P., Drumright, L. N., & Holmes, A. H. (2012) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70283-3 · Cited by 123
Reedman, S. E., Boyd, R. N., & Sakzewski, L. (2017) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.13413 · Cited by 136
Richardson, M. A., Khouja, C., Sutcliffe, K., & Thomas, J. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024950 · Cited by 135
Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: Use the entire menu of constructs
Brehaut, J. C., & Eva, K. W. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-114 · Cited by 120
CPD of the future: a partnership between quality improvement and competency‐based education
Sargeant, J. M., Wong, B. M., & Campbell, C. M. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13407 · Cited by 133
Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
García, L., Mendonça, G., Benedetti, T. R. B., Borges, L. J., Streit, I. A., Christofoletti, M., Silva-Júnior, F. L. E., Papini, C. B., & Binotto, M. A. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1 · Cited by 118
McCullough, A. R., Rathbone, J., Parekh, S., Hoffmann, T., & Mar, C. D. (2015) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkv164 · Cited by 117
Debono, D., Taylor, N. J., Lipworth, W. L., Greenfield, D., Travaglia, J., Black, D. A., & Braithwaite, J. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0572-1 · Cited by 130
Neale, E. P., Middleton, J., & Lambert, K. (2020) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-020-01731-x · Cited by 119
Fishman, J., Yang, C. F., & Mandell, D. S. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01153-9 · Cited by 137
Handley, M. A., Harleman, E., Gonzalez-Mendez, E., Stotland, N. E., Althavale, P., Fisher, L., Martinez, D., Ko, J., Sausjord, I., & Rios, C. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0426-2 · Cited by 116
Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals
Scobbie, L., Wyke, S., & Dixon, D. L. (2009) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215509102981 · Cited by 116
Patton, D., Hughes, C. M., Cadogan, C. A., & Ryan, C. A. (2016) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.1007/s40266-016-0426-6 · Cited by 127
Tavender, E. J., Bosch, M., Gruen, R. L., Green, S., Knott, J. C., Francis, J., Michie, S., & O’Connor, D. A. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-8 · Cited by 114
Self-citationHagger, M. S., Lonsdale, A. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2011) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2010.02011.x · Cited by 113
Eynon, M., Foad, J., Downey, J., Bowmer, Y., & Mills, H. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13403 · Cited by 94
Understanding health behavior change by motivation and reward mechanisms: a review of the literature
Michaelsen, M. M., & Esch, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1151918 · Cited by 114
Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification
Heinsch, M., Wyllie, J., Carlson, J., Wells, H., Tickner, C., & Kay-Lambkin, F. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18500 · Cited by 114
An Exploratory Study of “Quantitative Linguistic Feedback”
Suskind, D. L., Leffel, K. R., Hernandez, M. W., Sapolich, S. G., Suskind, E., Kirkham, E. M., & Meehan, P. (2013) · Communication Disorders Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1525740112473146 · Cited by 115
Antibiotic Stewardship—Twenty Years in the Making
Charani, E., & Holmes, A. H. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010007 · Cited by 112
The Impact of Videorecording on the Quality of Colonoscopy Performance: A Pilot Study
Rex, D. K., Hewett, D. G., Raghavendra, M., & Chalasani, N. (2010) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.245 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Michie, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michie, S
- ORCID
- Michie, S
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- PMC
- PMC1743963
- OpenAlex
- W2116567300
- Semantic Scholar
- bdf39eabaf7691033bd0ad16d7d7fa59c92141a9
- Cited by
- 3,440
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 186 · 2025: 221 · 2024: 317 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 372 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 349 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 202 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 159 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 39.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- British Psychological Society
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- evidence-based practice implementation, behavior change, theoretical constructs, consensus development, implementation research, healthcare professional behaviour, health psychology, social influence, emotion regulation, professional role and identity, knowledge and skills
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Models, Psychological, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
