Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in (1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and (2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience. METHODS: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: (1) identifying theoretical constructs; (2) simplifying into construct domains; (3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; (4) interdisciplinary evaluation; (5) validating the domain list; and (6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory" group (n = 18), a "health services research" group (n = 13), and a "health psychology" group (n = 30). RESULTS: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: (1) knowledge, (2) skills, (3) social/professional role and identity, (4) beliefs about capabilities, (5) beliefs about consequences, (6) motivation and goals, (7) memory, attention and decision processes, (8) environmental context and resources, (9) social influences, (10) emotion regulation, (11) behavioural regulation, and (12) nature of the behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The framework of 12 theoretical domains has proved useful in assessing and intervening with implementation problems, but the domain of behaviour has remained under-theorised and underused.
“Whilst this framework of 12 theoretical domains has proved useful in assessing and intervening with implementation problems [9], the domain of behaviour has remained under-theorised and therefore underused in its application.”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
The Discussion (page not available) identifies 12 domains for explaining implementation failures and designing interventions. Piloting interview questions (page not available) reports that field interviews identified relevant domains and suggested intervention strategies. This supports usefulness in assessment and intervention planning, but “proved useful in intervening” overstates the paper’s reported testing; the uncited second clause is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe original Theoretical Domains Framework group identified 33 theories and 128 key theoretical constructs related to behaviour change and synthesised them into a single framework.
“The group identified 33 theories and 128 key theoretical constructs related to behaviour change and synthesised them into a single framework”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The Results section reports 128 explanatory constructs drawn from 33 psychological theories, and the theory group describes organising them into an agreed framework of domains. However, the “Simplifying into theoretical domains” section says only 17 of the 128 constructs were prioritised as key for interdisciplinary research and 14 for changing healthcare professionals’ behaviour; it does not call all 128 key constructs. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConsideration of patient acceptability using theories of behaviour change is key to effective evaluation, design and implementation of healthcare interventions.
“It has been increasingly acknowledged that consideration of patient acceptability using theories of behaviour change are key to effective evaluation, design and implementation of healthcare interventions [23–25] .”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The Discussion says the paper develops a psychological-theory framework to explain failures to implement evidence-based practice and to design interventions for improved implementation. But the Abstract and piloting sections focus on changing healthcare professionals’ behaviour; they do not establish that considering patient acceptability is key to evaluating, designing, or implementing healthcare interventions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe TDF is an integrated theoretical framework synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs from 33 theories judged most relevant to implementation questions.
“The TDF is an integrated theoretical framework synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs from 33 theories judged most relevant to implementation questions.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The Results report identifying 128 constructs drawn from 33 psychological theories, and the paper describes developing an integrative framework for implementation research. But the Simplifying into theoretical domains section says only a subset of those constructs was prioritised as particularly relevant; it does not say that all 128 were judged most relevant to implementation questions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe TDF is a synthesis of 33 theories of behaviour and behaviour change clustered into 14 (originally 12) domains.
“A synthesis of 33 theories of behaviour and behaviour change clustered into 14 (originally 12) domains [15,16];”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The Results identify 128 constructs drawn from 33 psychological theories, and the Discussion describes the paper’s framework as 12 domains. Our copy does not describe a later 14-domain framework, so that part of the jointly cited claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
'Nature of the behaviour' was identified as one of 12 theoretical domains of influence on implementation-relevant behaviours.
“'Nature of the behaviour' was identified as one of 12 theoretical domains of influence on implementation-relevant behaviours [9].”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
The original Theoretical Domains Framework was developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists.
“an integrative framework of theories of behaviour change was developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists [13].”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The original Theoretical Domains Framework comprised 12 theoretical domains and exemplar questions for each.
“This resulted in 12 theoretical domains and exemplar questions for each to use in interviews or focus groups”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
Themes and constituent codes were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework by KR, EH and KA, and mapping was validated by JG.
“Following thematic analysis, themes and constituent codes were mapped to the TDF [24] by KR, EH and KA. Mapping was undertaken by determining the ‘fit’ of themes and codes with domains using domain descriptions as working definitions [25].Once mapping was complete, data were checked a final time by KR and then validated by JG to confirm fit with the framework; any discrepancies during the mapping”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Interviews followed a semi-structured schedule taking into consideration elements of the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, and the schedules were reviewed by the EQUITy Lived Experience Advisory Panel.
“Interviews followed a semi-structured schedule, taking into consideration elements of the TDF [24], and TFA [23]. Once drafted, interview schedules were reviewed by the EQUITy Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP).”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The TDF facilitated mapping study findings into coherent areas to target for change, providing a theoretically robust premise for later-stage implementation studies.
“The TDF facilitated in mapping the study findings into coherent areas to target for change providing a theoretically robust premise for later-stage implementation studies [24, 25].”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
A team of behavioural scientists developed the TDF in collaboration with implementation researchers in an effort to make theories more accessible to those working in implementation.
“In an effort to make theories more accessible to those working in implementation, a team of behavioural scientists developed the TDF in collaboration with implementation researchers [15].”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The TDF was initially developed for implementation research to identify influences on health professional behaviour related to implementation of evidence-based recommendations.
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was initially developed for implementation research to identify influences on health professional behaviour related to implementation of evidence-based recommendations and has been cited in over 800 peer-review publications (Web of Knowledge accessed April 2017).”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The majority of TDF domains relate to individual motivation and capability factors, while the domains cover the physical and social environment.
“Whilst the domains cover the physical and social environment, the majority relate to individual motivation and capability factors.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory.
“the TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory; it does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The TDF does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.
“the TDF is a theoretical framework rather than a theory; it does not propose testable relationships between elements but provides a theoretical lens through which to view the cognitive, affective, social and environmental influences on behaviour.”
From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
UK Medical Research Council guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates drawing on theory but does not specify how to select and apply theory.
“Useful guidance from the UK Medical Research Council for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates drawing on theory in intervention design but does not specify how to select and apply theory [9].”
From The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [9]
The introductory section (page not available) says that the many competing psychological theories leave no good basis for selecting among them. But our copy does not discuss UK Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions or say whether that guidance advocates theory while leaving its selection and application unspecified. Searches for the MRC guidance and complex interventions found only an MRC-funded research collaboration. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPoor theoretical underpinning makes it difficult to understand and explain how and why implementation succeeds or fails, thus restraining opportunities to identify factors that predict the likelihood of implementation success and develop better strategies to achieve more successful implementation.
“Poor theoretical underpinning makes it difficult to understand and explain how and why implementation succeeds or fails, thus restraining opportunities to identify factors that predict the likelihood of implementation success and develop better strategies to achieve more successful implementation.”
From Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
The discipline-specific approach in targeted innovations, settings, and end-users has resulted in multiple and potentially disparate frameworks being developed and used.
“This discipline-specific approach in the targeted innovations, settings, and end-users, has resulted in multiple and potentially disparate frameworks being developed and used [4,6-12].”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
Implementation and knowledge translation frameworks have predominantly developed within disciplines.
“Implementation and knowledge translation frameworks have predominantly developed within disciplines.”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
In the ensuing 9 years, the field has expanded considerably and further taxonomies, checklists, conceptual frameworks, theories, and models of implementation have been developed.
“In the ensuing 9 years, the field has expanded considerably and further taxonomies, checklists, conceptual frameworks, theories, and models of implementation have been developed [10,13,14,17,18].”
From A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
The concept of the individual might incorporate capability, capacity, motivation (including recognising a need for change), resilience, acceptability, feelings, knowledge and beliefs (including self efficacy) about the intervention/evidence, position and fit within the organization/social system, and approach to decision-making.
“we propose that the concept of the individual might incorporate: capability, capacity, motivation (including recognising a need for change), resilience, acceptability, feelings, knowledge and beliefs (including self efficacy) about the intervention/evidence, position and fit within the organization/social system, and approach to decision-making (e.g., experimentation, use of information).”
From The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
Intervention development frameworks offer guidance as to which BCTs to select for targeting mechanisms of action.
“Further, there are intervention development frameworks (e.g. the Behaviour Change Wheel Guide [72], Intervention Mapping [60] and the Theoretical Domains Framework [64, 65]), which offer guidance as to which BCTs to select for targeting mechanisms of action.”
The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) specifies 14 theoretical domains, each of which includes several theoretical constructs that are similar in definition but derive from different theories.
“The TDF specifies 14 theoretical domains, each of which includes several theoretical constructs that are similar in definition, but derive from different theories, and which may be relevant to understanding and changing behaviour.”
Michie et al.'s (2005) 12-domain original version of the TDF might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.
“and suggest that Michie et al.’s (2005) 12-domain original version might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as Michie et al.’s (2005)
The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed as an integrative framework of theories of behavior change to overcome these challenges.
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) [31] was developed as an integrative framework of theories of behavior change to overcome these challenges.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
The TDF includes 12 theoretical domains of potential behavioral determinants.
“The framework includes 12 theoretical domains of potential behavioral determinants and provides exemplar questions for the theoretical assessment of implementation problems.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
The consensus study that produced the TDF has been validated, leading to Cane et al.'s refined TDF.
“Since its original development, the consensus study that produced the TDF [31] has been validated, leading to Cane et al.’s [37] refined TDF.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
The refinement of the domain Motivation and goals of the original TDF into the domains Goals and Intentions in the recent version of the TDF and the classification of multiple goal-related constructs to the domains Goals, Intentions, and Behavioral regulation imply overlap between these domains.
“the refinement of the domain Motivation and goals of the original TDF [31] into the domains Goals and Intentions in the recent version of the TDF and the classification of multiple goal-related constructs to the domains Goals, Intentions, and Behavioral regulation imply overlap between these domains”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
The domain Reinforcement is a refinement of the Beliefs about consequences domain and was originally included within the latter domain in the original TDF.
“the domain Reinforcement is a refinement of the Beliefs about consequences domain and was originally included within the latter domain in the original TDF [31]”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
A valid TDF-based questionnaire will increase the use of theory in the assessment of barriers and facilitators for implementation problems, which can inform the selection of possible techniques that can be used to change healthcare professionals' behaviors.
“a valid TDF-based questionnaire will increase the use of theory in the assessment of barriers and facilitators for implementation problems [31,69,70], which can inform the selection of possible techniques that can be used to change healthcare professionals’ behaviors [15,23,26]”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
The results partly support Cane et al.'s validation of the TDF and suggest that the 12-domain version might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.
“The results partly support Cane et al.’s validation of the TDF [37] and suggest that the 12-domain version [31] might be more applicable in developing a TDF-based questionnaire.”
From Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
Michie et al. applied a systematic consensus approach to develop a framework grounded in psychological theory that simplifies theories relevant to behaviour change; the consensus identified 12 theoretical domains from 33 theories and 128 constructs that may explain health-related behaviour change.
“Michie et al. [20] applied a systematic consensus approach to develop a framework grounded in psychological theory that simplifies theories relevant to behaviour change. The consensus identified 12 theoretical domains from 33 theories and 128 constructs that may explain health-related behaviour change.”
The Theoretical Domains Framework can be used to inform the choice of potential behaviour change techniques to develop interventions as well as to investigate determinants of behaviour.
“The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) can be used to inform the choice of potential behaviour change techniques to develop interventions as well as to investigate determinants of behaviour [20].”
These reviews reflect calls for the use of theories to generate testable hypotheses linking tailored strategies with factors that promote or inhibit implementation, and attempts to identify theories or constructs best suited for successful implementation.
“They reflect calls for the use of theories to generate testable hypotheses linking tailored strategies with factors that promote or inhibit implementation, and various attempts to identify theories or constructs within theories best suited for successful implementation [15].”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [15]
All of these factors play a central role in behavior change associated with effective mental health treatments.
“All of these factors play a central role in behavior change associated with effective mental health treatments [87,88,89]”
From eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
Practice change theories and reviews of clinical practice change interventions suggest that interventions that address multiple barriers to care provision may be more likely to be effective.
“Practice change theories [19–22] and reviews of clinical practice change interventions suggest that interventions that address multiple barriers to care provision may be more likely to be effective [23, 24].”
From Increasing the provision of preventive care by community healthcare services: a stepped wedge implementation trial (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925 · see citing works
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737 · see citing works
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586 · see citing works
Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087 · see citing works
Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior
Becker, M. H. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,065 · see citing works
Oxman, A. D., Thomson, M., Davis, D. A., & Haynes, R. B. (1995) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
A guide to constructs of control.
Skinner, E. A. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549 · Cited by 1,805 · see citing works
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,709 · see citing works
Advances in Motivation and Achievement
(2014) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320140000018017 · Cited by 1,545 · see citing works
Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.186 · Cited by 1,343 · see citing works
(2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315167534 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Walker, A., Johnston, M., & Pitts, N. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.002 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice
Grol, R. P. T. M. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7105.418 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?
Wensing, M., van der Weijden, T., & Grol, R. P. T. M. (1998) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Helping People Change: A Textbook of Methods
Kanfer, F. H., & Goldstein, A. P. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7435.343 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Self-citationHardeman, W., Griffin, S., Johnston, M., Kinmonth, A., & Wareham, N. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801100 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Making better use of research findings
Haines, A., & Donald, A. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7150.72 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1991) · Cited by 197 · see citing works
(BCIO), B. C. I. O. (2022) · Definitions · doi:10.32388/ddp5lr · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Walker, A. E., Grimshaw, J., Johnston, M., Pitts, N., Steen, N., & Eccles, M. (2003) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-3-22 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Helping People Change: A Textbook of Methods
Good, R. (1992) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.1992.11732591 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework.
Robertson, N., Baker, R., & Hearnshaw, H. (1996) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.5.1.51 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Impact of Patient Socioeconomic Status on Physician Profiles
Fiscella, K. A., & Franks, P. J. (2001) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200101000-00003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Hand hygiene and aseptic technique in the emergency department
Al-Damouk, M., Pudney, E., & Bleetman, A. (2004) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2003.09.022 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Helping people change: A textbook of methods, 4th ed.
Kanfer, F. H., & Goldstein, A. P. (1991) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific
(2004) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qhc.13.5.355 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Hemoglobin Jianghua [beta 120(GH3) LYS leads to ILE]: a new fast-moving variant found in China.
Lu, Y., Fan, J. L., Liu, J., Hui-Lian, H., Peng, X., Huang, C. H., Huang, P. Y., Chen, S., Jai, P. C., & Ke-gong, Y. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4]4. Grimshaw J, Thomas R, Maclennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:6:1-84.
- [8]8. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997;315:418-21.
- [12]12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · see citing works
“Whilst this framework of 12 theoretical domains has proved useful in assessing and intervening with implementation problems [9], the domain of behaviour has remained under-theorised and therefore underused in its application.”
InfluentialSelf-citationProctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721 · see citing works
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629 · see citing works
Self-citationCane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 · Cited by 4,888 · see citing works
“To overcome such problems, an integrative framework of theories of behaviour change was developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists [13].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPowell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 · Cited by 4,963 · see citing works
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447 · see citing works
The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback
Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 · Cited by 4,452 · see citing works
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938 · see citing works
Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O’Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E. M., Colquhoun, H., Grimshaw, J. M., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9 · Cited by 3,819 · see citing works
“In an effort to make theories more accessible to those working in implementation, a team of behavioural scientists developed the TDF in collaboration with implementation researchers [15].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKirk, J. M. W., MacDonald, A., Lavender, P., Dean, J. M., & Rubin, G. (2017) · Biomedicine Hub · doi:10.1159/000480347 · Cited by 3,901 · see citing works
McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.521684 · Cited by 2,279 · see citing works
Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Eccles, M. (2008) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Self-citationForsetlund, L., Bjørndal, A., Rashidian, A., Jamtvedt, G., O'Brien, M. A., Wolf, F. M., Davis, D., Odgaard-Jensen, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub2 · Cited by 1,849 · see citing works
Kwasnicka, D., Dombrowski, S. U., White, M., & Sniehotta, F. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.941722 · Cited by 1,411 · see citing works
Self-citationHarvey, G., & Kitson, A. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2 · Cited by 1,271 · see citing works
Flottorp, S. A., Oxman, A. D., Krause, J., Musila, N. R., Wensing, M., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Baker, R., & Eccles, M. P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-35 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-36 · Cited by 1,096 · see citing works
Nilsen, P., & Bernhardsson, S. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943 · see citing works
May, C., Finch, T., Mair, F., Ballini, L., Dowrick, C., Eccles, M., Gask, L., MacFarlane, A., Murray, E., Rapley, T., et al. (2007) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-148 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people
Patterson, S. M., Cadogan, C. A., Kerse, N. M., Cardwell, C. R., Bradley, M. C., Ryan, C. A., & Hughes, C. M. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008165.pub3 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study
Clark, J., Glasziou, P., Del Mar, C., Bannach-Brown, A., Stehlik, P., & Scott, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Carey, R., Bohlen, L. C., Johnston, M., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., & Michie, S. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kay078 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards a general theory of implementation
May, C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-18 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Leeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation
Pronovost, P. J., Berenholtz, S. M., & Needham, D. M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1714 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Lau, R., Stevenson, F., Ong, B. N., Dziedzic, K., Treweek, S., Eldridge, S., Everitt, H., Kennedy, A., Qureshi, N., Rogers, A., et al. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
“developed using an expert consensus process [93].”
Atkins, S. A., Lewin, S. A., Swart, T. M., & Volmink, J. A. (2007) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-104 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Gamification: What It Is and Why It Matters to Digital Health Behavior Change Developers
Cugelman, B. (2013) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/games.3139 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Teixeira, P. J., Marques, M. M., Silva, M. N., Brunet, J., Duda, J. L., Haerens, L., La Guardia, J., Lindwall, M., Lonsdale, C., Markland, D., et al. (2020) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000172 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationTen recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice
Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Albers, B., Nilsen, P., Broder-Fingert, S., Mukasa, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2020) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Michie, S., Carey, R. N., Johnston, M., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., & Connell, L. E. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Self-citationPractice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness
Brehaut, J., Colquhoun, H. L., Eva, K. W., Carroll, K. A., Sales, A. E., Michie, S., Ivers, N. M., & Grimshaw, J. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2248 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Self-citationFrancis, J. J., O’Connor, D., & Curran, J. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-35 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care
May, C. (2006) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-86 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Presseau, J., McCleary, N., Lorencatto, F., Patey, A. M., Grimshaw, J. M., & Francis, J. J. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Khatib, R., Schwalm, J.-D., Yusuf, S., Haynes, R. B., McKee, M., Khan, M., & Nieuwlaat, R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084238 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Moullin, J. C., Sabater-Hernández, D., Fernandez-Llimos, F., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2015) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Huijg, J. M., Gebhardt, W. A., Crone, M. R., Dusseldorp, E., & Presseau, J. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-11 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Creating High Reliability in Health Care Organizations
Pronovost, P. J., Berenholtz, S. M., Goeschel, C. A., Needham, D. M., Sexton, J. B., Thompson, D. A., Lubomski, L. H., Marsteller, J. A., Makary, M. A., & Hunt, E. A. (2006) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00567.x · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The Handbook of Behavior Change
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Cane, J., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Ladha, R., & Michie, S. (2015) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12102 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Self-citationKlaic, M., Kapp, S., Hudson, P., Chapman, W. W., Denehy, L., Story, D., & Francis, J. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Presseau, J., Kirk, M. A., Lorencatto, F., Gould, N. J., Shea, C. M., Weiner, B. J., Francis, J., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0534-z · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Michie, S., West, R., Sheals, K., & Godinho, C. A. (2018) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibx019 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health
Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M. R., Walsh-Bailey, C., Lyon, A. R., Beidas, R., Mittman, B., Aarons, G. A., Weiner, B. J., & Chambers, D. A. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-00983-3 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Huijg, J. M., Gebhardt, W. A., Dusseldorp, E., Verheijden, M. W., van der Zouwe, N., Middelkoop, B. J., & Crone, M. R. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-33 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions
Scott, S. D., Albrecht, L., O’Leary, K., Ball, G. D., Hartling, L., Hofmeyer, A., Jones, C. A., Klassen, T. P., Burns, K. K., Newton, A. S., et al. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-70 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
Pinnock, H., Barwick, M. A., Carpenter, C. R., Eldridge, S. M., Gonzalo Grandes, O., Griffiths, C., Rycroft‐Malone, J., Meißner, P., Murray, E., Patel, A. K., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Johnston, M., Carey, R., Bohlen, L. C., Johnston, D. W., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., Groarke, H., & Michie, S. (2020) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa050 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Self-citationCugelman, B., Thelwall, M., & Dawes, P. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1367 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
“Of these various systems, two influence system taxonomies offered highly robust coding guidelines that reflected commonly reported behavioral change techniques and psychological constructs [38,50].”
InfluentialLinks Between Behavior Change Techniques and Mechanisms of Action: An Expert Consensus Study
Bohlen, L. C., Carey, R., de Bruin, M., Rothman, A. J., Johnston, M., Kelly, M. P., & Michie, S. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kay082 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citationThomas, A., Menon, A., Boruff, J. T., Rodríguez, A. M., & Ahmed, S. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-54 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Making Sense of Implementation Theories, Models, and Frameworks
Nilsén, P. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_3 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Improving patient safety in intensive care units in Michigan
Pronovost, P. J., Berenholtz, S. M., Goeschel, C. A., Thom, I., Watson, S. R., Holzmueller, C. G., Lyon, J. S., Lubomski, L. H., Thompson, D. A., Needham, D. M., et al. (2008) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.09.002 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Gitlin, L. N., Marx, K., Stanley, I. H., & Hodgson, N. (2015) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnu123 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Rycroft-Malone, J., Seers, K., Chandler, J., Hawkes, C. A., Crichton, N., Allen, C., Bullock, I., & Strunin, L. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-28 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types
Portela, M. C., Pronovost, P. J., Woodcock, T. M., Carter, P., & Dixon‐Woods, M. (2015) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science
Kislov, R., Pope, C., Martin, G. P., & Wilson, P. M. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0957-4 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Barriers and Facilitators to Exercise Participation in People with Hip and/or Knee Osteoarthritis
Dobson, F., Bennell, K. L., French, S. D., Nicolson, P. J. A., Klassmann, R. N., Holden, M. A., Atkins, L., & Hinman, R. S. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000448 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
2014 update of the EULAR standardised operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations
van der Heijde, D., Aletaha, D., Carmona, L., Edwards, C. J., Kvien, T. K., Kouloumas, M., Machado, P., Oliver, S., de Wit, M., & Dougados, M. (2015) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206350 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Nathan, N., Elton, B., Babic, M., McCarthy, N., Sutherland, R., Presseau, J., Seward, K., Hodder, R. K., Booth, D., Yoong, S. L., et al. (2017) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.012 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions
Powell, B. J., Proctor, E. K., & Glass, J. E. (2014) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731513505778 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Changing Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.002 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
De-implementing wisely: developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care
Grimshaw, J., Patey, A. M., Kirkham, K. R., Hall, A. M., Dowling, S. K., Rodondi, N., Ellen, M., Kool, R. B., van Dulmen, S. A., Kerr, E. A., et al. (2020) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010060 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: a systematic review
Guillaumie, L., Godin, G., & Vézina‐Im, L. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-12 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Forsetlund, L., O’Brien, M. A., Forsén, L., Mwai, L., Reinar, L. M., Okwen, P., Horsley, T., & Rose, C. J. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub3 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Cox, N. S., Oliveira, C. C., Lahham, A., & Holland, A. E. (2017) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.002 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Williams, N. J., & Beidas, R. S. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12960 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Tilson, J. K., Kaplan, S. L., Harris, J., Hutchinson, A., Ilić, D., Niederman, R., Potomková, J., & Zwolsman, S. E. (2011) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-78 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Tomás Pantoja, C., Opiyo, N., Lewin, S. A., Paulsen, E., Ciapponi, A., Wiysonge, C. S., Herrera, C. A., Gabriel Rada, G., Peñaloza, B., Dudley, L., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011086.pub2 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Strifler, L., Cardoso, R., McGowan, J., Cogo, E., Nincic, V., Khan, P. A., Scott, A., Ghassemi, M., MacDonald, H., Lai, Y., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.008 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Baker, C. N., Brown, S. M., Wilcox, P. D., Overstreet, S., & Arora, P. G. (2015) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-015-9161-0 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lavallée, J. F., Gray, T. A., Dumville, J. C., Russell, W., & Cullum, N. A. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0670-0 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Rethinking Connections Between Research and Practice in Education: A Conceptual Framework
Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x18761042 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback
Colquhoun, H. L., Brehaut, J. C., Sales, A., Ivers, N., Grimshaw, J., Michie, S., Carroll, K., Chalifoux, M., & Eva, K. W. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-66 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationBreastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review and economic analysis
Renfrew, M. J., Craig, D., Dyson, L., McCormick, F. M., Rice, S. J. C., King, S., Misso, K., Stenhouse, E., & Williams, A. F. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13400 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
the Canada PRIME Plus Team, Patey, A. M., Islam, R., Francis, J. J., Bryson, G. L., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-52 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Lippke, S., & Ziegelmann, J. P. (2008) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00339.x · Cited by 238 · see citing works
McGowan, L. J., Powell, R., & French, D. P. (2020) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12437 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature
Hakkennes, S., & Dodd, K. (2008) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023804 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review
Rushforth, B., McCrorie, C., Glidewell, L., Midgley, E., & Foy, R. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x683509 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation
Turk-Adawi, K. I., Sarrafzadegan, N., & Grace, S. L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness
Araújo‐Soares, V., Hankonen, N. E., Presseau, J., Rodrigues, A., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2018) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000330 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Zamboni, K., Baker, U., Tyagi, M., Schellenberg, J., Hill, Z. E., & Hanson, C. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Francis, J. J., Stockton, C., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Cuthbertson, B. H., Grimshaw, J. M., Hyde, C., Tinmouth, A., & Stanworth, S. J. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910708x397025 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Exploring knowledge exchange: A useful framework for practice and policy
Ward, V., Smith, S., House, A. O., & Hamer, S. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.021 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review
and the members of the Guidelines International Network Implementation Working Group, Gagliardi, A. R., & Alhabib, S. M. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0247-8 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Wilkinson, S. A., Thomas, S., Phillips, C. J., Marshall, A. P., Chaves, N. J., Jankelowitz, S. K., Lin, I. B., Loy, C. T., Rees, G., Sakzewski, L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s78458 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationFriese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wiers, R. W. (2011) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.536417 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
How can self-efficacy be increased? Meta-analysis of dietary interventions
Prestwich, A., Kellar, I., Parker, R. A., MacRae, S., Learmonth, M., Sykes‐Muskett, B., Taylor, N. J., & Castle, H. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.813729 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Lynch, E. A., Mudge, A., Knowles, S. E., Kitson, A. A., Hunter, S. C., & Harvey, G. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3671-z · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Alexander, K., Brijnath, B., & Mazza, D. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-60 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Challenges and Enablers of Deprescribing: A General Practitioner Perspective
Ailabouni, N., Nishtala, P., Mangin, D., & Tordoff, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151066 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Mazza, D., Chapman, A., & Michie, S. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-36 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental pretesting of hand-washing interventions in a natural setting
Judah, G., Aunger, R., Schmidt, W.-P., Michie, S., Granger, S., & Curtis, V. (2009) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.164160 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationAnderson, N. B. (2004) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952576.n210 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: protocol for a modified Delphi study
Slade, S. C., Dionne, C. E., Underwood, M. R., & Buchbinder, R. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006682 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
- Authors
- Michie, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michie, S
- ORCID
- Michie, S
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- PMC
- PMC1743963
- OpenAlex
- W2116567300
- Semantic Scholar
- bdf39eabaf7691033bd0ad16d7d7fa59c92141a9
- Cited by
- 3,440
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 186 · 2025: 221 · 2024: 317 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 372 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 349 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 202 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 159 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 39.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- British Psychological Society
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- evidence-based practice implementation, behavior change, theoretical constructs, consensus development, implementation research, healthcare professional behaviour, health psychology, social influence, emotion regulation, professional role and identity, knowledge and skills
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Models, Psychological, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
