Cited by 38HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyReproductive tract infections research

Correlates of a lifetime history of sexually transmitted infections among women who have sex with women in Toronto, Canada: results from a cross-sectional internet-based survey.

Open access
Logie, Carmen H, Navia, Daniela, Loutfy, Mona R·2015·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Structural drivers of sexually transmitted infections (STI) among women who have sex with women (WSW) have been underexplored. The study objective was to understand sociodemographic, individual, structural, and sexual health factors associated with a lifetime history of STI among WSW. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2012 to engage a peer-driven recruitment sample of WSW in Toronto, Canada. Data were collected among a convenience sample of 466 WSW using an online structured interview. RESULTS: Approximately one-fifth (n=89, 19.1%) of participants reported an STI diagnosis history. Participants identifying as bisexual were more likely, and lesbians less likely, to report an STI history than those identifying as queer. In multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for sociodemographic variables, STI history was associated with intrapersonal (STI knowledge, HIV/STI risk perceptions), interpersonal (male sex partners in past 3 months, number of lifetime sexual partners) and structural (sexual stigma, history of forced sex, belief healthcare provider (HCP) uncomfortable addressing sexual orientation) factors as well as sexual healthcare uptake (ever had STI/HIV test, STI/Pap test in past 2 years). Gender-non-conforming participants were less likely to report an STI history. CONCLUSIONS: This research is among the first to examine intrapersonal, interpersonal and structural factors correlated with an STI history among WSW. Findings highlight the importance of STI prevention strategies for WSW to be tailored to sexual identity, with particular attention to bisexual women's needs. Interventions should connect to sexual healthcare, address sexual stigma and train HCP to better meet the needs of WSW.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051745

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies regarding STI rates among WSW and WSWM indicate that WSWM experience higher rates of STIs than WSW, with rates comparable with women who have sex with men (WSM) in all studies reviewed.

    “Recent studies regarding STI rates among WSW and WSWM indicate that WSWM experience higher rates of STIs than WSW, with rates comparable with women who have sex with men (WSM) in all studies reviewed (279,285,286).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [286]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports higher self-reported STI rates among bisexual women than lesbians, supporting the direction of the WSWM–WSW comparison, though sexual identity is not identical to partner history. The Introduction (page unavailable) does not support rates comparable to women who have sex only with men in all studies reviewed: it says women with both male and female partners may be at higher risk than women with exclusively male or female partners. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Data indicate that C. trachomatis infection among WSW can occur.

    “Data indicate that C. trachomatis infection among WSW can occur (275,286,308,309).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [286]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Logie, C. H., Navia, D., & Loutfy, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Logie, Carmen H
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-12-04
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
278-283
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
  • 1472-3263
OpenAlex
W2107975274
Cited by
38
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (97106_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
women who have sex with women, bisexual women, lesbians, sexual stigma, HIV risk perception, sexual partners, sexual identity, STD prevention, Toronto
MeSH terms
Adult, Bisexuality, Chlamydia Infections, Condylomata Acuminata, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Herpes Genitalis, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Ontario, Peer Group, Sex Work, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Sexual Partners, Homosexuality, Female, Substance-Related Disorders, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review